New UT2k7 Screenies & Videos

[TheRyuu]

So will UT2007 use HDR?
And if so, what kind?

 

[otispunkmeyer]

looks like its running smooth in those vid's


hopefully thats not a quad SLI and ageia PhysX powerd machine.

 

[Lonyo]

I want the 8-Ball launcher, not a crappy rocket launcher.

 

[SynthDude2001]

Originally posted by: Lonyo

I want the 8-Ball launcher, not a crappy rocket launcher.

Old school :thumbsup:

Though, I actually have liked the UT and UT2004 rocket launchers too.

 

[Busithoth]

this game looks like it could entice me to get another gaming box.
damn.

 

[Soccerman06]

Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
looks like its running smooth in those vid's


hopefully thats not a quad SLI and ageia PhysX powerd machine.

Its suppose to support multi-thread cpus and ppu, hopefully we wont need quad-sli to run this. God my lappy is going to get dominated by this.

 

[n7]

More screenies & videos from IGN

http://pc.ign.com/articles/705/705569p1.html

 

[Xyclone]

Originally posted by: narutofan36
amazing.. too bad minium requirments are a 7800...thats just now, they might change it later

I don't think a 7800 could handle those graphics in those pics with a playable framerate.

 

[necro007]

Are thouse real in game PIC's?

 

[necro007]

Are thouse real in game PIC's?

 

[n7]

Originally posted by: necro007
Are thouse real in game PIC's?

AFAIK, yes

 

[shortylickens]

I know this is a drool fest because of the new photos, but does anybody know if they are actually going to improve the gameplay?

Along those lines its supposedly going to have 14 weapons, are they going to use catergories like Half-Life and Red Faction, or am I going to have to scroll through everything just to find what I want?

Or is it way too early to be asking gameplay questions?

 

[shortylickens]

Originally posted by: Xyclone

Originally posted by: narutofan36
amazing.. too bad minium requirments are a 7800...thats just now, they might change it later

I don't think a 7800 could handle those graphics in those pics with a playable framerate.

Well, Ut2003 and 4 were both playable on slow systems because you could change just about every detail setting in the game. The last few settings were easily accessed in the INI file.

I suspect this new version will be similar. All those screen shots were at a high resolution with max detail, but I'd bet you can probably simplify the lighting and textures down to UT classic levels.
In which case it will likely run on an X600.

 

[Xyclone]

Originally posted by: shortylickens

Originally posted by: Xyclone

Originally posted by: narutofan36
amazing.. too bad minium requirments are a 7800...thats just now, they might change it later

I don't think a 7800 could handle those graphics in those pics with a playable framerate.

Well, Ut2003 and 4 were both playable on slow systems because you could change just about every detail setting in the game. The last few settings were easily accessed in the INI file.

I suspect this new version will be similar. All those screen shots were at a high resolution with max detail, but I'd bet you can probably simplify the lighting and textures down to UT classic levels.
In which case it will likely run on an X600.

Would you happen to know if an ATI X1900XT could handle the graphics present in those screen shots?

 

[shortylickens]

Originally posted by: Xyclone

Originally posted by: shortylickens

Originally posted by: Xyclone

Originally posted by: narutofan36
amazing.. too bad minium requirments are a 7800...thats just now, they might change it later

I don't think a 7800 could handle those graphics in those pics with a playable framerate.

Well, Ut2003 and 4 were both playable on slow systems because you could change just about every detail setting in the game. The last few settings were easily accessed in the INI file.

I suspect this new version will be similar. All those screen shots were at a high resolution with max detail, but I'd bet you can probably simplify the lighting and textures down to UT classic levels.
In which case it will likely run on an X600.

Would you happen to know if an ATI X1900XT could handle the graphics present in those screen shots?

Well as ashamed as I am to admit it, I left ATI after 6 generations. Ignored the X1900 and went for the 7900GTX.
I think my current card could probably handle that, though I like my frame rate to be in the 60's for FPS, so maybe not.

 

[n7]

You can play UT2k4 at lower settings on an integrrated ATi Xpress 200 graphics system, so i'm sure they'll do a good job with optimizing 2k7.

I'm sure a 7900GT + will be more than fine for mediumish settings, but really, no one knows.

 

[Acanthus]

Originally posted by: hans030390
Um...some of the texture work is lacking. It's not as impressive as I originally thought.

They're still using sprites for explosions??? how lame.

They cant be using sprites afaik, it supports PhysX. Unless they are just spawning a bunch of random junk to perform physics on for explosions.

 

[Stuxnet]

All I care about is whether or not they fixed the player scaling. UT2003/4's biggest blunder was the scaling. I loved the rest of it.

 

[n7]

Another link added, this time with very high resolutions shots