*NEW UPDATED 2* Post Your Cinebench R11.5 Score

[crashtech]

I think capturing and posting the speed at which the test was performed is a critical part of the usefulness of this data, so I'm no longer going to place scores in the list if CPU speed, in the form of a screenshot, is missing. Since Cinebench does not typically report CPU speed accurately, an app like CPU-Z, AIDA64, or equivalent must be used.

Soon, I'm going to delete scores from these users for which acceptable CPU speed data was never posted, unless or until we hear from them:

Basilownzyou ____i7-4930K ____________ ????GHz | 13.97
moonbogg________ i7-3930K ____________ ????GHz | 12.91
APU_Fusion _____ i7-4790K ____________ ????GHz | 10.65
jj109 __________ i7-4770K ____________ ????GHz | 9.03
aigomorla ______ Xeon L5520 __________ ????GHz | 7.73

 

[Burpo]

 

[Burpo]

Damn it YBS1.. your record stands.. for now

 

[YBS1]

Ewwwww....That's ohh so close, you'll probably get it.

 

[Burpo]

I'm going to get a window fan now! () Throttling 4 cores..

Edit.. nope, you're safe. Just don't have the cooling to do it, even with a window fan on it. Need liquid cool



On a side note. the SaberTooth is badass.. whatever chip you get, it will wring it out.. Watching cores throttle, never a blue screen.

 

[YBS1]

Lol, I know it's killing you, just five measly points. I felt the same way back when I was just two points shy of 20k in Firestrike with the 3930k and two 780s.

 

[Burpo]

I'm done.. can't do it on air..

 

[richierich1212]

Haha Burpo.

 

[crashtech]

Serious BIOS issues prevented me from completely wringing this thing out, ultimately a pretty disappointing showing.

 

[MongGrel]

I still couldn't be on top but the one I have listed is an old chip.

Hadn't messed with this bench in awhile

 

[Burpo]

Serious BIOS issues prevented me from completely wringing this thing out, ultimately a pretty disappointing showing.

How do you figure that? A 65 watt quad core CPU, besting an L5639 Hex-core @ 140-150 watts is a pretty disappointing showing?

I don't think so..

 

[ClockHound]

Sure performance per watt... but Crashtech held the quad core record with his DC at 5G for a 10.97! So it's an upgrade that isn't the upgrade he hoped for. But, he is a generous uncle tho.

 

[Deders]

Skylake@4600

 

[Burpo]

Nice Deders, really nice!

 

[Deders]

Skylake at 4781

 

[TheELF]

Please run single threaded as well as this will also show the multiplier.
(how much of the computing speed gets lost when running all cores compared to just one)

 

[Deders]

As requested. Note that for the multi benchmark it hovers between 4781 and 4784.
For the single benchmark it jumps between 478x and 488x

 

[TheELF]

Very nice numbers,thank you.

 

[YBS1]

Mah Window Home Server! C2Q Q8400S@2.66GHz (HP EX495 w/ upgraded cpu/memory WHS2011)
Sure is a cool running little chip to be passively cooled.

 

[Burpo]

My daily driver Gateway FX-8020 with Xeon X3230 (also passive) just won't die. 8 yrs & counting @ 24 X 7 uptime..

 

[TheELF]

Processors sure have come a long way since those days.

 

[YBS1]

My little mini-itx HTPC @4.7GHz. I think this is about all I'll get out of it, I did manage to get a successful run at 4.8GHz immediately afterwards but it's using a keyboard with a built in touchpad and like an idiot I accidently touched the pad and started another run which crashed. It wasn't much higher anyway (4.33) as the indicated speeds according to cpu-z were bouncing around a bit between ~4690 and 4800, not sure why. Obviously not stable anyway.

 

[crashtech]

I wasn't expecting a whole lot, but I'm really happy with this 6600K. It's a decent overclocker and just feels FAST. It's been a long time since a straight quad core has been in my gaming rig, since SB I've always had an i7. Couldn't find a 6700K at the time, and the plan was to swap this 6600K out as soon as the i7 becomes more available, but this i5 performs so well, I might not bother.

 

[burninatortech4]

 

[burninatortech4]