• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

New Official ATOT Nef Thread II

Page 71 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Seriously, if I see one more "But...but...states force people to buy auto insurance!" when discussing the FEDERAL health care law (and even ignoring that driving is NOT a right), I might harm someone.

And if you point that out to them, they'll a) not answer or b) find something else to sputter about.
 
I'm trying to think of something I can use to basically rant against the idea of a formalized education, at least, from this particular school. It'll be an amusing narration.

It's a pity I'm not allowed to just dig up an old one, I only have half a dozen of them, because every English teacher every single year wants another one.
 
And if you point that out to them, they'll a) not answer or b) find something else to sputter about.

What these idiots don't seem to get is that even though people like me disagree with the HC law, I wouldn't be as pissed if it were passed via appropriate channels. By that, I mean via Constitutional amendment or by state legislatures. Otherwise, they're twisting the words and intent of the Constitution and it pisses me off.
 
What these idiots don't seem to get is that even though people like me disagree with the HC law, I wouldn't be as pissed if it were passed via appropriate channels. By that, I mean via Constitutional amendment or by state legislatures. Otherwise, they're twisting the words and intent of the Constitution and it pisses me off.

Commerce Clause! General welfare! :awe:
 
Pearson replied. Using a form letter requesting more information, half of which was provided, and the other half being totally irrelevant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top