• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

New laws to take effect on New Years Day.

techs

Lifer
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051231/ap_on_re_us/new_laws

New Jersey and Virginia will bar making public a person's Social Security number, while Minnesota will require businesses that hold such information to quickly notify clients if there is a breach of security.

Michigan, for one, will now demand background checks of just about anyone working at schools, and it will ban convicted sex offenders from living or working within 1,000 feet of a school, or even loitering in the vicinity.

Florida is taking steps to limit the influence of lobbyists, barring them from paying for any food, alcohol or gifts for lawmakers and other state and local officials. The state also is adding a slew of new reporting requirements for lobbyists. (Still, legislators left a loophole in the law, dropping language that would have barred lobbyists from giving money to political parties so they could, in turn, use it to pay for lawmakers' food and drink.)

Legislatures sought ways to improve safety on the highways, demanding seat belt use in taxis and shuttle vans in Oregon, requiring motorists hogging the left lane to move to the right in Florida, and trying to discourage drunk driving in Tennessee by requiring that offenders help clean up state highways while wearing vests emblazoned with the phrase "I am a Drunk Driver" in 4-inch lettering.

In California, paparazzi ? photographers who chase celebrities for lucrative snapshots ? could be hit with hefty civil penalties if they commit assaults. Victims can seek punitive damages and income earned from the pictures involved.

Oklahoma cut taxes for nearly everyone, and New York cut them for those making more than $150,000 a year. Florida cut taxes on stocks and bonds. Nevada gave a tax break to property owners, while West Virginia lowered its tax on food from six cents per dollar to five cents.

Missouri created a state prescription drug program for lower-income seniors to pick up costs not covered by the new federal Medicare prescription plan. Nevada now requires insurance companies to cover cancer patients participating in the earliest phase of clinical trials. Wisconsin lawmakers expanded the state's health care program for the working poor to provide prenatal care and delivery services to illegal immigrants and inmates.

Complaints about illegal immigrants spurred a new Virginia law that will make such people ineligible for state or local benefits such as welfare or health care. Some illegal aliens, however, could still receive benefits from Medicaid, the federal-state health care program for the poor.

And in Missouri, complaints about homeowners' associations overly broad powers brought a law that requires associations to delete "restrictive covenant" policies that discriminate by race or religion. There had been accusations that such language remained in the laws of some associations in the Kansas City area.

Not all laws were so serious. Illinois approved a state amphibian, the Eastern tiger salamander, after it won 51 percent of Internet voters, beating the gray tree frog and the American toad. "The toad and the frog kind of split up the vote and allowed the salamander to slip in," Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn said.

Happy New Year.
 
In Kentucky, when a driver drops car insurance or it lapses in any way, the state will be able to find out as insurance companies are now required to report such lapses of coverage to the state.

Hopefully this will drastically cut the number of uninsured drivers on the road (I've heard estimates as high as 16% but I'd bet it's more...having been the victim not once but twice of being hit by drivers with no insurance.)
 
You want to hear the poor howl--------wait until you see the Feds drop alot of EIC kids off the tax refund rolls coming this tax year/05.-----some responsible step dad supporting unwed Mom's rug rats by another marriage will have to marry the gal and adopt the rug rats to get the EIC he got before.

Net effect, a lot of step dads will run------punishing the kids for choosing the wrong parents as Mom is forced to go on welfare.--------compassionate conservatism in actions.
 
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
What's the point in tax breaks for the wealthy?


Because you must be wealthy to make large donations to political canidates. What is the point of donating if you can't buy what you want-----namely tax cuts for yourself.

Its the golden rule-those who have the gold makes the rules.
 
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
What's the point in tax breaks for the wealthy?


Because you must be wealthy to make large donations to political canidates. What is the point of donating if you can't buy what you want-----namely tax cuts for yourself.

Its the golden rule-those who have the gold makes the rules.

Hehe yeah if they wouldn't tithe, and bribe polititions they would have less reason to complain about their taxes.
 
In UK - from now, you can be arrested and detained for ANY illegal act.
This includes littering, not wearing seatbelts, anything.
Not to say they will, but, if you get stopped for nothing, now you gotta lick butt so you don't get detained.
 
Originally posted by: speedstream5621
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
What's the point in tax breaks for the wealthy?
The people who are getting those breaks are the ones who are going to go out and start a business...and create jobs in the process.
You really believe that nonsense, don't you? Guess you never took any economics classes. Businesses start up to provide a good or service they estimate they can make a profit on. As long as their is capital available to start the business it will get started. Demand therefore is what gets businesses started. And tax cuts for people who need or want to spend the money on goods and services (rather than treat it as investment money)is what stimulates the economy.
You are still of the belief that supply side economics works despite the proof that it hasn't.
It truly is voodoo economics.

 
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: speedstream5621
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
What's the point in tax breaks for the wealthy?
The people who are getting those breaks are the ones who are going to go out and start a business...and create jobs in the process.
You really believe that nonsense, don't you? Guess you never took any economics classes. Businesses start up to provide a good or service they estimate they can make a profit on. As long as their is capital available to start the business it will get started. Demand therefore is what gets businesses started. And tax cuts for people who need or want to spend the money on goods and services (rather than treat it as investment money)is what stimulates the economy.
You are still of the belief that supply side economics works despite the proof that it hasn't.
It truly is voodoo economics.

Um, there is no proof that supply side economics doesn't work. There is only evidence. Only the ignorant call it voodoo economics.
 
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: zendari
Haha, Bush engineered "tax cuts for the rich" in Hillary's playground! :laugh:

State tax breaks...nothing to do with Bush fanboi! :laugh:

Guess you missed the sarcasm. I wonder why leftwinged havens like New York are providing evil taxcuts.
 
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: zendari
Haha, Bush engineered "tax cuts for the rich" in Hillary's playground! :laugh:

State tax breaks...nothing to do with Bush fanboi! :laugh:

Guess you missed the sarcasm. I wonder why leftwinged havens like New York are providing evil taxcuts.

Maybe because they have a surplus as do many states now giving tax cuts? Oh, and $150,000 is not even close to rich in NY. I understand it's $150,000 and up, but the cutoff is not the rich point in NY..especially NYC.

Interesting article in Boston Globe today:

1 in 20 households in Boston are millionaires...4.8%
Philadelphia: 4.0%
DC: 4.0%
L.A. 3.7%
N.Y. 3.7%
Chicago: 3.7%

 
Back
Top