new lara croft

[Aquila76]

Originally posted by: lytalbayre
You guys ragging on stretch marks and such would be suprised if you ever seen high res pics of all the "HOT" actresses in Hollywood (Even Miss Jollie). Never under-estimate the special effects of body makeup, lighting, and soft-filters.

Just about 99% of WOMEN have them, and for those who rag on women when they see them makes me think they are still virgin boys who don't have a chance with real women.

SUMMARY: She's damn hot. Very nice face and eyes.

She is hot, I wasn't debating that. But you would think for a professional set of publicity photographs, they would have airbrushed or otherwise tweaked that out. Even some kind of dermatological treatment or something. Just seems odd there was no gubament-style coverup.

 

[Koing]

Originally posted by: Aquila76

Originally posted by: lytalbayre
You guys ragging on stretch marks and such would be suprised if you ever seen high res pics of all the "HOT" actresses in Hollywood (Even Miss Jollie). Never under-estimate the special effects of body makeup, lighting, and soft-filters.

Just about 99% of WOMEN have them, and for those who rag on women when they see them makes me think they are still virgin boys who don't have a chance with real women.

SUMMARY: She's damn hot. Very nice face and eyes.

She is hot, I wasn't debating that. But you would think for a professional set of publicity photographs, they would have airbrushed or otherwise tweaked that out. Even some kind of dermatological treatment or something. Just seems odd there was no gubament-style coverup.

I prefer 'real' pics then air brushed pics. Air brushed pics usually look far too over done.

Koing

 

[n yusef]

Originally posted by: Aquila76

Originally posted by: lytalbayre
You guys ragging on stretch marks and such would be suprised if you ever seen high res pics of all the "HOT" actresses in Hollywood (Even Miss Jollie). Never under-estimate the special effects of body makeup, lighting, and soft-filters.

Just about 99% of WOMEN have them, and for those who rag on women when they see them makes me think they are still virgin boys who don't have a chance with real women.

SUMMARY: She's damn hot. Very nice face and eyes.

She is hot, I wasn't debating that. But you would think for a professional set of publicity photographs, they would have airbrushed or otherwise tweaked that out. Even some kind of dermatological treatment or something. Just seems odd there was no gubament-style coverup.

From a photography standpoint the pics are horrible, with flash shadows and not so great poses. The fact that 30 minutes wasn't put into these photos to make them presentable is very puzzling to me.

The girl is pretty hot, I'd definately hit it, but I like Angelina more. There's more to girls than looks. Her attitude/how she carries herself is very important. Jolie has a tough personality that goes with Lara Croft, and I doubt that the new girl has the same toughness.

 

[0roo0roo]

Originally posted by: gotsmack
bring back one of the originl tomb raider models: Rhona Mitra

http://imdb.com/name/nm0593961/

yea she was my favorite. the jailbait one was pretty nice too

and yea she's pretty but she doesn't look like lara croft. all the previous models did.

 

[0roo0roo]

http://www.hollywoodtuna.com/?p=929

 

[ForumMaster]

Originally posted by: joedrake

u'r right. she has got the "assets", but she's uglier then Angeline Jolie.

 

[alfa147x]

Horrible picture though....