New Highlander or Grand Cherokee?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
The highlander is just as quick as the Jeep V8, and gets better mileage, it also gets slightly better mileage than the V6 Jeep.
 

Vic Vega

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2010
4,535
3
0
The highlander is just as quick as the Jeep V8, and gets better mileage, it also gets slightly better mileage than the V6 Jeep.

The V8 Jeep has almost 100 more HP and boatloads more torque... if the Highlander is quicker the Jeep must have some long gearing. Do you have some numbers showing the Highlander is quicker?
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,377
126
I've seen tests of 0-60 on the V8 Jeep (not the SRT8, obviously) of 7.0 flat. The fastest highlander test I've seen is 7.2, so it's in the same range at least. It's all kind of academic though, unless it's painfully slow (the new 3.6 isn't), it doesn't much matter.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
The Jeep weighs a lot more, which pretty much cancels it's HP advantage and leaves it behind in mileage.

I own a 2008 5.7L GC, the Jeep 3.6 is indeed painfully slow if you've driven a V6 highlander or a V8 Jeep.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,377
126
Maybe it's a mental thing, I've never felt the need to haul ass in a big SUV. I drove a company Suburban about a decade back for road trips, it was way down in power/weight compared to the 3.6 GC, and it was fine.

I think that thing only had a little over 200hp. And the wonderful 4-speed auto, lol :D
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
GC's actually handle pretty good.

Check out the massive strut brace in mine:

711e5acbd9aa4012a2dc1438c4d09ba55g.jpg
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
Maybe it's a mental thing, I've never felt the need to haul ass in a big SUV. I drove a company Suburban about a decade back for road trips, it was way down in power/weight compared to the 3.6 GC, and it was fine.

I think that thing only had a little over 200hp. And the wonderful 4-speed auto, lol :D

A big SUV loaded down with a family, all their crap for a trip, and either a rooftop carrier or small trailer trying to go up a steep grade on the highway will really make test the limits of an engine.
 
Nov 29, 2006
15,685
4,199
136
Im still debating between these 2. We dont need the 3rd row seating at all that the Highlander offers. And i enjoy the more "rugged" look of the Cherokee even though ill never offroad it. May get stuck in snow a time or two but wont go 4 wheeling so to speak. I do agree the interior seating material on the Cherokee felt and looked a lot nicer then that Highlander..at least on the cloth material we are looking at. Cant vouche of the leather.
 

herm0016

Diamond Member
Feb 26, 2005
8,443
1,070
126
i would not buy a highlander just because of the annoying adds.
the cherokee is a much better looking vehicle also.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
You only need a two-wheel drive Grand Cherokee and some snow tires then. That will save you on the purchase price and on the fuel economy.
 

mafia

Golden Member
Jul 10, 2008
1,671
3
76
The Toyota Highlander shares the same platform as a Camry. The Grand Cherokee shares the same platform as a Mercedes Benz ML SUV. Speaks for itself. To me, the Highlander is a lifted up Camry, while the Grand Cherokee is a "real" SUV.
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
The Toyota Highlander shares the same platform as a Camry. The Grand Cherokee shares the same platform as a Mercedes Benz ML SUV. Speaks for itself. To me, the Highlander is a lifted up Camry, while the Grand Cherokee is a "real" SUV.

+1.

The Highlander is butt-ugly as well...
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,543
651
126
The Toyota Highlander shares the same platform as a Camry. The Grand Cherokee shares the same platform as a Mercedes Benz ML SUV. Speaks for itself. To me, the Highlander is a lifted up Camry, while the Grand Cherokee is a "real" SUV.

Factor in reliability, the MB ML has had horrid reliability history.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,377
126
Factor in reliability, the MB ML has had horrid reliability history.

AFAIK, they don't have any MB motor/tranny/ecu/etc in the platform itself, it's really the chassis/frame design right? IIRC Mercedes worst problems recently were plagues of electronic demons.
 
Nov 29, 2006
15,685
4,199
136
Well my wife and I signed papers on Saturday for a Mineral Grey 4x4 Laredo. For the options i wanted they had to pull one from east Texas. So we wotn take posession of it until Tuesday or Wednesday. But ill take a few pics if people are interested :)
 

richardycc

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2001
5,719
1
81
guess it's too late for OP, but for future toyota/jeep buyers, here is my 2cents. I used to own toyota, 2 4runners, a 97 then a 03, then bought a 06 jeep GC in 06 just for a change, and it was few thousands cheaper than a comparable one from toyota, so it was a no brainer. to get right to the point, I will never buy another Jeep again, nothing but small little problems here and there, and horrible resale value, so I can't really get rid of it without taking a huge lost. oh and last week, my check engine light is on, scanned it with a code PO133, guess I will need to replace the oxygen sensors, this SUV has 4 of these, 2 pre-CC, 2 after...fun time ahead.
 

amish

Diamond Member
Aug 20, 2004
4,295
6
81
bought a 06 jeep GC in 06 just for a change, and it was few thousands cheaper than a comparable one from toyota, so it was a no brainer. to get right to the point, I will never buy another Jeep again, nothing but small little problems here and there, and horrible resale value, so I can't really get rid of it without taking a huge lost. oh and last week, my check engine light is on, scanned it with a code PO133, guess I will need to replace the oxygen sensors, this SUV has 4 of these, 2 pre-CC, 2 after...fun time ahead.

i'm the exact opposite. i have a 2007 GC and i love it. i bought it in 2009 and haven't had any problems yet. i don't intend to get rid of it either so the resale value doesn't affect me. if i sold it right now the KBB is $2K less than what i bought it for.

when this vehicle finally buys the farm and either rusts out or the engine/transmission dies i will be replacing it with another JGC.
 

drquest

Golden Member
Apr 18, 2001
1,148
7
81
The new Jeep looks great and is selling very well. The Highlander I'm sure is an ok vehicle, but wouldn't even be on my short list.

Congrats on your purchase and upcoming new Jeep!
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
guess it's too late for OP, but for future toyota/jeep buyers, here is my 2cents. I used to own toyota, 2 4runners, a 97 then a 03, then bought a 06 jeep GC in 06 just for a change, and it was few thousands cheaper than a comparable one from toyota, so it was a no brainer. to get right to the point, I will never buy another Jeep again, nothing but small little problems here and there, and horrible resale value, so I can't really get rid of it without taking a huge lost. oh and last week, my check engine light is on, scanned it with a code PO133, guess I will need to replace the oxygen sensors, this SUV has 4 of these, 2 pre-CC, 2 after...fun time ahead.

The 4 sensors is normal for a modern vehicle.

Your code is bank 1 sensor 1.

I thought GC resale value was actually high.

My 2008 has been pretty much flawless. No complaints, really. If I had to complain, it would be about the dealers, who seem to know less about the vehicle than online sites like WKJEEPS.
 

JJ650

Golden Member
Apr 16, 2000
1,959
0
76
We got the '11 Overland 4x4, with the V6. I wish it was the V8. I think the v6 in it is underpowered to me. The interior is nice. Leather dash, real wood trim and comfy seats. It does well on the road/trail to our cabin retreat. The selectable terrain feature is nice too.