New Ford Explorer getting ecoboost engine?

KDOG

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,525
14
81
I've heard through varoius sources that the new Explorer may get the ecoboost engine but that it will be a 2.0l I4 and NOT the 3.5l version. I don't know why they can't offer both. The freakin Flex has the ecoboost V6 why can't the explorer get it too? Hopefully Ford will offer the V6 ecoboost on the Explorer. I'm looking for a new SUV with decent mileage and towing capabilities and the larger ecoboost would rock in the explorer. I test drove one this morning and its now on my short list of vehicles along with the F150.

Anyone know more about this issue?

Sent from my SCH-I400 using Tapatalk
 

ThatsABigOne

Diamond Member
Nov 8, 2010
4,422
23
81
That small of engine in that big vehicle.. No freakin way.

Sent from my computer using Tapatalk
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,509
1
81
Engine size has nothing to do with it. It has to do with engine output/reliability.

Sent from my computer not using Tapatalk
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
2.0 Ecoboost has more hp/torque than the 4.6L V8 that was in a lot of full size heavy stuff not that long ago. Should be fine, but nothing super exciting. Hopefully it delivers killer fuel economy for that segment.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
Are they going to make the Exploder smaller too? Seems like a 2.0l I4 would be underpowered in a vehicle that large.

Sent from my desktop at work not using Tapatalk
 

drnickriviera

Platinum Member
Jan 30, 2001
2,443
250
136
Did they ever put the ecoboost in the fusion or focus? They kept talking about it, but never did it.

Sent from Uranus using Tapatalk
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
It will have around 240HP and 250TQ. Should be plenty. It completely outclasses the V6 that used to power most of them. The 4 banger will only be available in the front wheel drive version, supposedly.

That 2.0L EB engine will also be in the next Taurus.

Keep in mind that the Explorer is front wheel drive based.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
If the torque curve of the 2L EB engine is like other EB engines, the 4 cylinder will probably feel pretty lively.
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,509
1
81
I thought the new Explorer was already out??

Sent from Android phone not using Tapatalk while sitting on the toilet at work.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
I thought the new Explorer was already out??

Sent from Android phone not using Tapatalk while sitting on the toilet at work.

It is, they are all over the place. The 4 cylinder is coming a bit later. They all have a 290HP/255TQ Duratec 3.5L V6 in them for now.

The 4 cylinder will have about the same torque, probably over a nice wide band.

Edit, yep:

237 hp (177 kW) at 5500 rpm, 250 lb·ft (339 N·m) at 1750-4500 rpm
 

KDOG

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,525
14
81
It is already out. But we were just discussing whether or not it will be getting the V6 ecoboost engine. It looks like it is not.

Sent from my SCH-I400 using Tapatalk
 

Pulsar

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2003
5,224
306
126
In a future model year it will get the I4 (like next year possibly).



Typed with my own fingers not using Tapatalk and it's stupid advertising
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
The 4 cylinder is supposedly going to be priced higher. So it probably won't make any sense to buy one with it. Likely the fuel economy advantage will be eaten up by the extra cost of the GTDI engine.
 

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
The 4 cylinder is supposedly going to be priced higher. So it probably won't make any sense to buy one with it.
Why do you assume this?

The Chevy Cruze is one vehicle where the bigger engine only comes on the base model. The better and more expensive models have a smaller engine that has about the same power but way more torque and better gas mileage.
 

PhoKingGuy

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2007
4,685
0
76
Why do you assume this?

The Chevy Cruze is one vehicle where the bigger engine only comes on the base model. The better and more expensive models have a smaller engine that has about the same power but way more torque and better gas mileage.

It was in the press release for the engine, the F-150 is the same way.

Side note: I see these things EVERYWHERE, they are selling like hotcakes.

I'm also seeing like 5-6 Nissan Leafs a day now on my commute.
 

KDOG

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,525
14
81
In a future model year it will get the I4 (like next year possibly).



Typed with my own fingers not using Tapatalk and it's stupid advertising


LOL I agree but don't know how to get rid permanetly. I have to backspace it out.

EDIT: Nevermind, got it.
 
Last edited:

GuitarDaddy

Lifer
Nov 9, 2004
11,465
1
0
I'm going to hold off a couple of years until I jump on the ecoboost band wagon, until the reliability is better known. I certainly hope they turn out to be the wonder engines that they appear to be, maybe I'm too skeptical but a 2L boosted 4 banger with HP and TQ numbers that rival a V8 seem too good to be true. To me to squeeze all that performance out of a small 2L engine something has to be sacrificed and the obvious sacrifice would seem to be reliability.
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
The 2011 Explorer was supposed to debut with the 2.0L I-4 Ecoboost (Ford even had it listed on the website and in the Order Guide, albeit with no mpg numbers) and then also be offered in the 2011 Edge. Then it turned into late availability for 2011. Now it's supposed to be in the 2012 Explorer and Edge, and also at least the 2013 Taurus.

Given the slip, if it slips more, one wonders WTF is wrong keeping it from being introduced...

EDIT: It will be an increased $$$ option over the normal 3.5L V-6, and only be offered in FWD. And, at least on the Explorer, no towing package for it - remains to be seen on Edge (Explorer comes with Class III, Edge comes with Class II, so maybe the Edge will be able to have it).

Chuck
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
Why do you assume this?

The Chevy Cruze is one vehicle where the bigger engine only comes on the base model. The better and more expensive models have a smaller engine that has about the same power but way more torque and better gas mileage.

a GTDI engine costs way more to make...

It's already been announced all over the place that the GTDI 4 will be priced higher.

Perhaps when it actually debuts, Ford will have re-thought pricing, but I doubt it.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
I'm going to hold off a couple of years until I jump on the ecoboost band wagon, until the reliability is better known. I certainly hope they turn out to be the wonder engines that they appear to be, maybe I'm too skeptical but a 2L boosted 4 banger with HP and TQ numbers that rival a V8 seem too good to be true. To me to squeeze all that performance out of a small 2L engine something has to be sacrificed and the obvious sacrifice would seem to be reliability.

Reliability is already well known, isn't it? Lots of testing has been done and the engines were already available in Europe.
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
I think Ford is just introducing the 2.0 I-4 EB in EU. DI and Turbo though have been around for a while, check out VAG.
 

Pulsar

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2003
5,224
306
126
Yeah, we already know they're extremely reliable. The real problem is capacity for expected demand. They're working on it.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,389
8,547
126
I've heard through varoius sources that the new Explorer may get the ecoboost engine but that it will be a 2.0l I4 and NOT the 3.5l version. I don't know why they can't offer both. The freakin Flex has the ecoboost V6 why can't the explorer get it too? Hopefully Ford will offer the V6 ecoboost on the Explorer. I'm looking for a new SUV with decent mileage and towing capabilities and the larger ecoboost would rock in the explorer. I test drove one this morning and its now on my short list of vehicles along with the F150.

Anyone know more about this issue?

Sent from my SCH-I400 using Tapatalk

no one has any idea why the EB 3.5 is available in the flex but not the explorer.

you could just... i dunno... get the flex? it's a better vehicle in practically every way
 

KDOG

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,525
14
81
Ford Flex:

Lower tow cap

Too low to the ground

Kinda ugly. (Not hideous though)

The more I keep researching vehicles the more I come back to a F150 with the base 3.7l V6. In the extend cab config it still has a 5500 lb tow cap, gets decent mileage and would have a lower price tag. I have yet to test drive that engine so I don't know how it feels. I won't be buying for several more months so I have some time to hang back and do some more research.