Originally posted by: Nitemare
Wow, did Ebay elect a retard CEO recently or what?
Yes.
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Wow, did Ebay elect a retard CEO recently or what?
Originally posted by: Ns1
Originally posted by: ryan256
Yeah!
So the 23 feedback I've built up over my 7+ years at ebay will now be reduced to 2 because I don't shop there regularly!
Thanks alot ebay. F U 2!!
Well you might've been a good seller then and you might be a dbag now. Past performance isn't necessarily an indicator of future performance =P
Originally posted by: oogabooga
Originally posted by: Ns1
Originally posted by: ryan256
Yeah!
So the 23 feedback I've built up over my 7+ years at ebay will now be reduced to 2 because I don't shop there regularly!
Thanks alot ebay. F U 2!!
Well you might've been a good seller then and you might be a dbag now. Past performance isn't necessarily an indicator of future performance =P
when did selling on ebay turn into politics?Is ask not what ebay can do for you, but what you can do for ebay next?
Originally posted by: scootermaster
No, the end of ebay was moron sellers "waiting" for me to give them good feedback, and then (and only then) giving me good feedback.
That's retarded. What they should have done is implemented some sort of system where once the item is paid for -- especially via paypal -- the seller is obligated to give good feedback to the buyer. I mean, think about how indignant you all get at a retail establishment; once you hand over the cash, you want your item NOW and you don't want to hear any BS about it, and you want good customer service and blah blah blah.
Once you pay, your part of the transaction is done. If I have a problem -- after I paid -- with a seller, and I want to express that in feedback, I shouldn't have to worry about some asshole seller tainting my feedback in retaliation.
So I have ZERO sympathy.
Originally posted by: scootermaster
No, the end of ebay was moron sellers "waiting" for me to give them good feedback, and then (and only then) giving me good feedback.
That's retarded. What they should have done is implemented some sort of system where once the item is paid for -- especially via paypal -- the seller is obligated to give good feedback to the buyer. I mean, think about how indignant you all get at a retail establishment; once you hand over the cash, you want your item NOW and you don't want to hear any BS about it, and you want good customer service and blah blah blah.
Once you pay, your part of the transaction is done. If I have a problem -- after I paid -- with a seller, and I want to express that in feedback, I shouldn't have to worry about some asshole seller tainting my feedback in retaliation.
So I have ZERO sympathy.
The lifetime counts will stand. The positive feedback percentage will be calculated, based on the last 12 months. Sellers will figure out a standard way to mark their Bad buyers feedback...Originally posted by: oogabooga
Originally posted by: Fritzo
Seems to me this would stop retaliatory feedback. I left bad feedback for a guy with a misleading auction, the member is now suspended, and he left negative feedback to me saying I was a bad buyer (I paid him within 5 minutes of winning). This works fine for me.
I just wish we could leave more detailed feedback. I think that would go a long ways towards being able to see if something is retaliatory vs something that is legit.
I'm kinda sad, i have little Ebay feedback and it will be virtually wiped out since I use it once ever 6 months or so.
edit: I guess I'll be going from +23 feedback as a member since October 2002 to +4 feedback? Thanks Ebay.
I barely use ebay as is, I guess I have even less reason too now.
