- Jun 12, 2005
- 5,320
- 8
- 81
I would like to see this pass. Then I would like to see them show how they actually get your number when you look at the report.
This is a tiny law that will save some people a few bucks. I think ultimately whoever is spending time on this should get the fvck to work and stop dicking around on tax payer money. Don't these idiots have any real work to do or are they only capable of spending resources working on bills that are very easy to get everybody on board with and nobody cares to challenge because ultimately they are quite irrelevant?
annualcreditreport.com is the free site for the report and you will be solicited to pay for the score. IIRC, equifax was $8.00. I do not remember if it was tied in to a monitoring program.I disagree mainly because when I bought my house, I couldn't even pay to find out my credit score. No website would provide it unless I signed up for some bullshit "credit monitoring" $15/month service. It's a total scam. I don't mind there being a propietary and opaque method for determining my score, and I don't mind paying to learn what it is, but I draw the line at being coerced into signing up for a service. That's bullshit.
That formula for that number is proprietary and I believe it changes from time to time. If it was a set forumula and Fair Isaac had to divulge it, it would put them out of business.
I disagree mainly because when I bought my house, I couldn't even pay to find out my credit score. No website would provide it unless I signed up for some bullshit "credit monitoring" $15/month service. It's a total scam. I don't mind there being a propietary and opaque method for determining my score, and I don't mind paying to learn what it is, but I draw the line at being coerced into signing up for a service. That's bullshit.
annualcreditreport.com is the free site for the report and you will be solicited to pay for the score. IIRC, equifax was $8.00. I do not remember if it was tied in to a monitoring program.
You can go to myfico.com and get a one time FICO score. No need to sign up with a service.
It is bullsh*t, but it's also of no consequence compared to other major laws that need to be on the books now and the government has been playing grab ass instead of working, namely banking reform.That formula for that number is proprietary and I believe it changes from time to time. If it was a set forumula and Fair Isaac had to divulge it, it would put them out of business.
I disagree mainly because when I bought my house, I couldn't even pay to find out my credit score. No website would provide it unless I signed up for some bullshit "credit monitoring" $15/month service. It's a total scam. I don't mind there being a propietary and opaque method for determining my score, and I don't mind paying to learn what it is, but I draw the line at being coerced into signing up for a service. That's bullshit.
I started looking for houses about 3 years ago. I googled, posted on forums, checked the major websites and did pretty much all I could on the internet and could not find anything that didn't require signing up. I don't know if these options are new. I don't mind paying $8.00, really, how often do you need to know your credit score?
I started looking for houses about 3 years ago. I googled, posted on forums, checked the major websites and did pretty much all I could on the internet and could not find anything that didn't require signing up. I don't know if these options are new. I don't mind paying $8.00, really, how often do you need to know your credit score?
Supposedly, equifax is the only one that uses a true fico. I know the others don't. They add adjustments to the #. Who knows for what reason. There's only one bank in town that doesn't use equifax. And all of the consumer finance co.s, like me, use equifax.Well, I look at both my reports (all 3) and my FICO twice a year. And the "scores" you get from TransUnion, Experian, and Equifax are NOT FICO's. They are useless, actually.
That was the reason for the govt to set up annualcreditreport.com. You can get all 3, once per year, free.I can see this issue both ways. First we do need to open up the system a bit just because identity fraud is a growing problem. But, if we open it up too much where individuals now can game the system, the system will no longer be useful to lenders. I think it is fair for lenders to be able to assess someone's risk before handing him a boatload of money.
That was the reason for the govt to set up annualcreditreport.com. You can get all 3, once per year, free.
They already game the system. You'll love this. Actual applicant of mine. Applied and I pulled the credit. Score was ~650. Name was real familiar so I checked my turn downs. Sure enough, she had applied a year earlier and her score was ~390 (now that's hard to do). Multiple charge offs on the older report. NONE on the new. WTF? My equifax rep explained it. She filed a police report for id theft and, by law, equifax has to let her cherry pick the "fraudulent" accounts and have them removed. She got rid of multiple I-9s and kept the I-1s. 2 of the companies that charged her off previously had actually re-opened her loans. The only note on the report was a one line, 2 word "fraud alert".
Nope. Just a police report. So she filed a false report but who's going to check. Not the police, too busy.How ironic.
That's unbelievable. Do you have to provide any evidence of ID theft?
How ironic.
That's unbelievable. Do you have to provide any evidence of ID theft?
390 IS hard to do. I am not even sure how I'd do it because that shows you're probably getting people to give you credit when it's already shot somehow. Or had a lot of accounts and defaulted all at the same time.That was the reason for the govt to set up annualcreditreport.com. You can get all 3, once per year, free.
They already game the system. You'll love this. Actual applicant of mine. Applied and I pulled the credit. Score was ~650. Name was real familiar so I checked my turn downs. Sure enough, she had applied a year earlier and her score was ~390 (now that's hard to do). Multiple charge offs on the older report. NONE on the new. WTF? My equifax rep explained it. She filed a police report for id theft and, by law, equifax has to let her cherry pick the "fraudulent" accounts and have them removed. She got rid of multiple I-9s and kept the I-1s. 2 of the companies that charged her off previously had actually re-opened her loans. The only note on the report was a one line, 2 word "fraud alert".
That's what she did. Had multiple previous accounts with 5 or 6 different creditors, all paid I-1. Then every one was charged off for non payment. The medical collections/public records helped too.390 Or had a lot of accounts and defaulted all at the same time.
Live for today because the cat might eat you tomorrow.Consider the sparrow...................
Consider the sparrow...................
Live for today because the cat might eat you tomorrow.![]()
Supposedly, equifax is the only one that uses a true fico. I know the others don't. They add adjustments to the #. Who knows for what reason. There's only one bank in town that doesn't use equifax. And all of the consumer finance co.s, like me, use equifax.
People should have a right to know the exact method for determining your credit score. It's used in to many aspects of our lives not to know this.