• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

New cheap material already pushes solar cell efficiency over 16%

Great news for the solar cell market. Now i only hope it is not patented to death.


http://phys.org/news/2014-06-superconducting-ferroelectric-properties-perovskite.html

5-superconduct.jpg


(Phys.org) —Perovskite materials are the newest contender for breaking the silicon ceiling in solar cell technology. But they don't just absorb light. Cambridge researchers have found they emit it like a laser, opening up an entirely new field of applications.

Discovered 175 years ago in Russia's mineral treasure box – the Ural Mountains – and named after the mineralogist Count Lev Aleksevich von Perovski, perovskite is fast becoming a 'rock' to be reckoned with. In 2013, the use of perovskite materials in solar cells was voted as one of the breakthroughs of the year by Science magazine; more recently, the Guardian website declared that they "are the clean tech material development to watch right now."

Perovskite is a term used to describe a group of materials that have a distinctive crystal structure of cuboid and diamond shapes. They have long been of interest for their superconducting and ferroelectric properties. But, in the past five years, it was discovered that they are also remarkably efficient at absorbing photons of light and that this can be converted into an electric current in photovoltaic solar cells.

A defining moment came in 2012, when Professors Henry Snaith at the University of Oxford and Michael Graetzel at the Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, building on the work of Tsotomu Mayasaka from Tokyo, found that solar cells with perovskite as the active component could be made with greater than 10% power conversion efficiencies for turning the sun's rays into electrical energy. A mere two years later, Snaith increased this to 17%. For silicon-based solar cells, it's taken 20 years of research to achieve this level.

Now, researchers in Cambridge have found another property of this remarkable material – it doesn't just absorb light, it also emits it as a laser.

Led by Professor Sir Richard Friend from the Department of Physics, the researchers have been investigating how perovskites work by exciting the material with light and monitoring energy absorption at incredibly fast timescales, taking 'snapshots' a few quadrillionths of a second apart.

As PhD student Michael Price described: "This enables us to monitor directly what is happening to the electrons, which generate the current in the material – where the excitations are and how they are destroyed, essentially how fast they live and die."

In collaboration with Snaith's group in Oxford, the scientists are using this fundamental insight to help them understand how the efficiency of perovskite-based photovoltaics might be extended yet further.

The lasing properties (published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters in March) were discovered when Friend's team measured the photoluminescence efficiency of the material, and found that up to 70% of absorbed photons were emitted under the right conditions. This led to the idea of sandwiching a thin layer of the lead halide perovskite between two mirrors to create an optically driven laser.

"It turns out that perovskites are remarkably fluorescent materials," explained Friend. This is not in itself a surprise – since the early 1960s a relationship between the generation of electrical charges following light absorbtion and the process of 'recombination' of these charges to emit light has been known. "But these materials do so very efficiently," said Friend. "It's unusual in a material that is so simply and cheaply prepared."

"Mix and squirt," is how Price described the preparation process: "we make a solution of the halide perovskites and spin- coat them onto an electrode. There's no need for elaborate purification." This simple process, which the scientists say is scalable, is in contrast to the painstaking growth of crystals needed for other solar cell materials like silicon to ensure that the number of defects in the materials is kept as low as possible.

"Perovskites are cheap and abundant, they are easily fabricated and they have a high efficiency of energy conversion – these three together are the holy grail of photovoltaics, which is why there is such excitement about them at the moment," added Dr Felix Deschler.

The lasing properties of perovskites raise expectations for even higher solar cell efficiencies, as Friend explained: "There's a fundamental relationship between how good a material is at emitting light and how well it works in a solar cell."

The team's work is based on a programme of research on organic (i.e. carbon-containing) semiconductors that has spanned over 20 years in Friend's laboratory, most recently as part of the Winton Programme for the Physics of Sustainability, and has resulted in the development of roll-to-roll printing of photovoltaic materials, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and printed transistors for paper displays. The techniques Friend's group has developed for characterising organic semiconductors are now being deployed on the mostly inorganic perovskite materials.

The current focus is on identifying the fundamental mechanisms that are at play when photons of light raise electrons in the material to higher energy states, and on looking at precisely how and where energy losses occur – an understanding of which will be crucial to maximising the efficiency of these light-harvesting solar cells.

Intriguingly, early results show that the material doesn't appear to work in the way that might be expected. "For me, the excitement is that these materials break the rules," said Friend. "Many of their properties are somewhere between those of an organic and an inorganic semiconductor. The way we make them, they should have too many chemical and structural defects to work as well as they do and yet they are as efficient as purified silicon, which is a single crystal."

Would they be better if cleaned up? "Possibly," said Friend, "but we want to have our cake and eat it. We want the efficiencies and the ease of preparation."

Defects in materials normally cause charged electrons to get 'stuck' and lose their energy. One possibility for perovskites might be that the defects don't matter because the material has the capacity to 'self-heal'.

"There's something going on... these materials have a tolerance to disorder

which is unusual," explained Friend. "It's speculation, but perhaps the material can fill defects on the fly. The way the material is prepared creates a lot of free ions, and these might move around and fill up defects. Imagine a bumpy road with potholes – the ions might fill the potholes and then the electrons have a smooth ride."

A better understanding of these processes will feed into the collaboration with Snaith's group, helping the scale-up and commercial deployment of perovskite-based photovoltaics through the Oxford spin-out Oxford Photovoltaics.

Meanwhile, the Cambridge team is also pursuing the material's light-emitting properties, as Deschler explained: "It opens up a completely new field of applications. The laser industry is huge – they are used in areas that are critical for our lives, including telecommunications, medicine and industry. We think there will be applications for perovskites that extend far beyond thesolar cell."

In particular, the researchers are now looking at applying the high luminescence efficiency to create light-emitting diodes. Other members in the research group have already had some very promising results in this area, which should be published soon.

"This feels like it's the dawn of a new field," said Friend. "So far we've looked at the materials as they are. The question now is how good will they be?"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perovskite
 
Universities? Of course it'll be patented to death. What else do they have going for them? Tuition? lol.
 
Why wouldn't they patent it to death? If I spent years and millions of dollars on something, you bet your ass I would patent to death. I want a return on my investment.
 
Nothing wrong with patenting findings. But what i am afraid for is bad commercial views. Unless a big multinational start selling Perovskite solar cells, a startup might not have enough chance and the Perovskite solarcell becomes shelved. I would rather see that it gets patented and licensed in a reasonable manner to as many as solar cell producers as possible to give Perovskite solar cells momentum in the market. If this stuff really has so view negative aspects, it is a shame to just let it be shelfed.
 
I'd put up solar if only as a big middle finger to the government for raising the electricity rates so much to pay for their pork barrelling. Cost is still prohibitively high though. The real trick is making them both efficient, and inexpensive.
 
Why don't they work on battery tech so we can go 100% off the grid.

I commend their work but batteries need some work..
 
Why does this crap almost never come out at least in the massive world changing ways that we would like?

I'm thinking of solar leaf and graphene. Maybe the developers talk big to get funding or something. Well i guess GMO's went viral but not sure it will be good thing.
 
Not by 1 %.
They increased efficiency in two years to a level that took current solar tech science 20 years. And there is now very much research going on to understand how this perovskite material works at the atom scale. At the atom level it is being researched. With current physics and science level it is no longer pick and guess but using state of the art physics to understand what is going on.

http://phys.org/news/2014-01-scientists-unravel-mechanism-functioning-solar.html#nRlv

Swiss scientists have uncovered the mechanism by which novel, revolutionary solar cells based on lead iodide perovskite light-absorbing semiconductor transfer electrons along their surface. The finding shows these devices constitute a new type of solar cells and open the way to the design of photovoltaic converters with improved efficiency.

Photovoltaic energy conversion offers one of the best means for the future of renewable energy in the world. The efficiency of solar cells depends heavily upon the light-absorbing materials they use. Photovoltaic systems based on lead halide perovskite are a new, revolutionary type of device with efficiencies currently exceeding 16%. However, a detailed description of how these solar cells turn light into electrical current is still lacking. Publishing in Nature Photonics, scientists from EPFL have investigated how the generated electrical charge travels across the perovskite surface of solar cells built with different architectures.

Lead halide perovskites are materials that have recently attracted an immense interest, as solar cells based on these semiconductors demonstrate very high conversion efficiencies and an unsurpassed cell voltage of more than 1 V. However, it is not entirely clear how they work. A better understanding of their functioning mechanisms would help improve them in the future or even open up novel technologies with increased efficiency.

The groups of Michael Grätzel and Jaques E. Moser at EPFL, working with the Institute for Solar Fuels in Berlin, have used time-resolved spectroscopy techniques to determine how charges move across perovskite surfaces. The researchers worked on various cell architectures, using either semiconducting titanium dioxide or insulating aluminum trioxide films. Both porous films were impregnated with lead iodide perovskite (CH3NH3PbI3) and an organic "hole-transporting material", which helps extracting positive charges following light absorption. The time-resolved techniques included ultrafast laser spectroscopy and microwave photoconductivity.

The results showed two main dynamics. First, that charge separation, the flow of electrical charges after sunlight reaches the perovskite light-absorber, takes place through electron transfer at both junctions with titanium dioxide and the hole-transporting material on a sub-picosecond timescale. Secondly, the researchers found that charge recombination was significantly slower for titanium oxide films rather than aluminum ones. Charge recombination is a detrimental process wasting the converted energy into heat and thus reducing the overall efficiency of the solar cell.

The authors state that lead halide perovskites constitute unique semiconductor materials in solar cells, allowing ultrafast transfer of electrons and positive charges at two junctions simultaneously and transporting both types of charge carriers quite efficiently. In addition, their findings show a clear advantage of the architecture based on titanium dioxide films and hole-transporting materials.


http://phys.org/news/2014-01-perovskite-solar-cells-cheaper-materials.html#inlRlv

(Phys.org) —Due to their rapid improvements in a short amount of time, perovskite solar cells have become one of today's most promising up-and-coming photovoltaic technologies. Currently, the record efficiency for a perovskite solar cell is 15% and expected to improve further. Although the perovskite material itself is relatively inexpensive, the best devices commonly use an expensive organic hole-conducting polymer, called spiro-OMeTAD, which has a commercial price that is more than 10 times that of gold and platinum.

In a new study, Jeffrey A. Christians, Raymond C. M. Fung, and Prashant V. Kamat from the University of Notre Dame in Indiana have found that copper iodide, an inexpensive inorganic hole-conducting material, may serve as a possible alternative to spiro-OMeTAD. Although the efficiency of perovskite solar cells containing copper iodide measured in this study is not quite as high as those containing spiro-OMeTAD, the copper iodide devices exhibit some other advantages that, overall, suggest that they could lead to the development of inexpensive, high-efficiency perovskite solar cells.

"The hole conductor is currently the most expensive part of perovskite solar cells," Christians told Phys.org. "Other organic hole conductor alternatives to spiro-OMeTAD have been investigated, but these alternatives still remain very expensive. This is the first reported inorganic hole conductor for perovskite solar cells, and is much less expensive than previously reported hole conductor materials. This low-cost hole conductor could further lower the cost of these already inexpensive solar cells."

Perovskite solar cells, as a whole, are attractive because perovskite is a class of materials with a particular crystal structure that is the same as that of calcium titanium dioxide. This structure gives solar cells high charge-carrier mobilities and long diffusion lengths, allowing the photo-generated electrons and holes to travel long distances without energy loss. As a result, the electrons and holes can travel through thicker solar cells, which absorb more light and therefore generate more electricity than thin ones.

Although this study marks the first time that copper iodide has been investigated for use as hole conductors in perovskite solar cells, copper-based hole conductors have previously shown promise for use in dye-sensitized and quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. Part of their appeal is their high conductivity. In fact, copper iodide hole conductors exhibit an electrical conductivity that is two orders of magnitude higher than spiro-OMeTAD, which allows for a higher fill factor, which in turn determines the solar cell's maximum power.


Despite the copper iodide's high conductivity, the results of the current study showed that perovskite solar cells made with copper iodide hole conductors have a power conversion efficiency of 6.0%, lower than the 7.9% measured here for cells with spiro-OMeTAD hole conductors. The researchers attribute this shortcoming to the fact that spiro-OMeTAD solar cells have exceptionally high voltages. In the future, they think that the voltages of copper iodide solar cells can be increased, in particular by reducing the high recombination rate. The researchers calculated that, if they could achieve the highest parameter values observed in this study, the resulting copper iodide solar cell would have an efficiency of 8.3%.

The researchers also observed that the copper iodide solar cells exhibited another surprising advantage, which is good stability. After two hours of continuous illumination, the copper iodide cells showed no decrease in current, while the current of the spiro-OMeTAD cells decreased by about 10%. The researchers plan to further improve the devices in the future.

"We are currently working to understand the cause of the low voltage in copper iodide-based perovskite solar cells," Christians said. "With further work, we aim to increase the stability and improve the efficiency of these solar cells above 10%.

"The biggest challenge facing perovskite solar cells is long-term stability in a wide range of environments. The efficiency of the best perovskite solar cells is competitive with current commercial technologies, and they are potentially much cheaper. However, commercial solar cells must last 20-30 years with minimal degradation, and whether or not perovskite solar cells are capable of this type of long-term stability is currently an unanswered question."

perovskiteso.jpg
 
Last edited:
I'd put up solar if only as a big middle finger to the government for raising the electricity rates so much to pay for their pork barrelling. Cost is still prohibitively high though. The real trick is making them both efficient, and inexpensive.

That's what happened here. There was a big push for people to stop watering lawns and using so much water one year. It worked and the next year the city raised the water rates because they still need to generate revenue.

Same with gasoline. Freak 50 miles to the gallon, raise the price of oil because they still need their profit margin.

If cheap solar cells take off the electricity prices will soar, we might not even be allowed to go off grid and the ones who can't afford the upfront costs of going solar will face increasing pressure to change over just like I am with my 92 gmc sierra and how much it costs to fill the tank.
 
Last edited:
The big question is for the used organic material. How long will it remain stable under intense sunlight.
But to the defense, current silicon solar cells also stop working rather quickly. The cheap solar cells for garden lights die of quickly because the solarcell stops functioning. I wonder how long the large panels keep working.
 
Not by 1 %.
They increased efficiency in two years to a level that took current solar tech science 20 years. And there is now very much research going on to understand how this perovskite material works at the atom scale. At the atom level it is being researched. With current physics and science level it is no longer pick and guess but using state of the art physics to understand what is going on.

http://phys.org/news/2014-01-perovskite-solar-cells-cheaper-materials.html#inlRlv




http://phys.org/news/2014-01-perovskite-solar-cells-cheaper-materials.html#inlRlv



perovskiteso.jpg

Damnit, don't go throwing crap like this out there trying to change our minds. He's still not impressed! :whiste:
 
Revolutionary efficiency in a photovoltaic you say?
Works like a laser you say?

Well, do call me when you've a prototype with 95% efficiency.

Scaramanga.png
 
Solar does not need batteries. Store the heat in molten salt.
To go 100% off the grid you need batteries.

When you get solar without batteries and the power from the grid drops your solar doesn't work for obvious reasons. That is lame. You spend all this money on solar and can't even use it when the power goes down.
 
To go 100% off the grid you need batteries.

When you get solar without batteries and the power from the grid drops your solar doesn't work for obvious reasons. That is lame. You spend all this money on solar and can't even use it when the power goes down.

Damn right. Nobody is working on batteries anywhere in the world. Need to stop focusing on dumb solar shit and get back to batteries. What a bunch of dumbass researchers we have. Next thing you know they will want to be paid for this crap. 🙄
 
There is tons of battery research going on there. Just google it.

I fly electric RC airplanes and twenty years ago they were slow and heavy with nicads, could barley fly for 5 mins. Then it was nimh batteries which was a minor leap but what revolutionised the electric RC industry was Lipos. Everything is electric now from huge helicopters that can be flown for 15+ minutes and drones. The drone industry has exploded due to lipos. We need more leaps like that in battery technology.

What I would like to see is a effort like the Manhattan or Apollo project to develop new super efficient and cheaper storage and production of power. Just think if a battery or what ever you call it could power you car for a week or your work tools for a month your phone or tablet for a year. What if never had to worry about power again. Think what society could do if the problems of limited power where mostly gone.
 
Back
Top