• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

New CD: 378 copies = $2.2 million

AnitaPeterson

Diamond Member
I apoligize for pasting this huge article, but since it's the Wall Street Journal, the site isn't accessible.

I thought you might like to see where record companies spend the money earned on overpriced CDs, Napster lawsuits and shameless propulsion of mediocrity.

Happy Reading!

Source
The Wall Street Journal
Headline
The $2.2-million CD that went bust: MCA's effort to create 'new Britney' ends up selling 378 copies
Byline
Jennifer Ordonez
Section
Arts
Dateline
MARINA DEL REY, California

MARINA DEL REY, California - Eighteen-year-old recording artist Carly Hennessy is packing up her small apartment. Her promotional posters
will go into storage, and the beige rental couch will be returned. A weight-control message that the slender teen scrawled in marker on the
refrigerator -- "NO, U R FAT" -- will be wiped clean.

For two years, MCA Records paid the rent here while Hennessy prepared for pop stardom. And that's not all: The label so far has spent $2.2
million to make and market her new album, an upbeat pop recording called Ultimate High.

"Some people struggle for years," she says. "I was very, very lucky."

Not lucky enough. Ultimate High was released in stores across North America three months ago. So far, it has sold 378 copies worldwide --none
in Ottawa, it seems, although a few copies are available at CD Warehouse and HMV.

At the suggested retail prices, those sales amounted to less than $5,000. In many other industries, this would be considered an extraordinary
bomb. But in today's troubled music business, it's routine. Of the thousands of albums released in North America each year by the five major
record companies, fewer than five per cent become profitable.

The high failure rate has become the focus of an escalating battle. On one side are big names such as Don Henley and Sheryl Crow, who are
fighting the industry practice of holding top performers to multiple-album contracts that can take decades to fulfill. They complain that labels
unfairly enforce such deals because they need to offset their lavish spending on ill-conceived acts that never make it.

"We're expected to indefinitely fund the record company," says Henley, a solo artist and member of the Eagles, who calls the industry's high
percentage of flops "shameful."

Record companies say they need to keep blockbuster acts on their rosters for as long as possible because they rarely see returns on the huge
sums they sink into new performers, and because it's so hard to predict who will succeed. The companies warn they won't be able to support as
much young talent if contracts are limited, and point out that some of the loudest critics of the current system were its beneficiaries -- before they
were rock stars.

The companies also say it's become harder to launch new acts. Deregulation of the U.S. radio industry in '96 led station owners to consolidate into
a few big companies, which are under pressure to maximize profits and pull songs off the air that aren't instant hits.

Also, superstores such as Wal-Mart, which stock fewer titles than traditional music stores, are the fastest-growing segment of music retailing,
making it costlier and more competitive for record labels to secure prime shelf space.

As a result, industry executives estimate that major-label releases must sell 500,000 copies just to break even. Last year, of the 6,455 new albums
distributed in North America by major labels, only 112 sold that many.

The story of MCA and Carly Hennessy shows the dysfunctional economics of the music industry at work. MCA hooked up with the spunky teen
three years ago because it was trying to get a piece of the great success competitors enjoyed with young pop artists like Britney Spears and 'N
Sync.

Hennessy, a native of Dublin, had released her debut musical effort, Carly's Christmas Album, in Ireland at age 10, after performing all over
Europe as Little Cosette in Les Miserables. Soon, she and her family began hoping for much more, and by 15 Hennessy had dropped out of
school. "The most beautiful voice you'd ever heard -- and she would have ended up singing in the bath," says her father, Luke Hennessy.

He flew to Los Angeles in early '99 and, after several months got a disc of his daughter performing songs by various artists into the hands of music
producer Steve Dorff. He recorded a new demo of Hennessy singing some songs he'd written, and it eventually crossed the desk of MCA
president Jay Boberg, who says he found Hennessy's voice "extraordinary."

Although Hennessy didn't write her own music and hadn't ever performed solo in front of a big crowd, she had charisma, drive and pipes -- three
things music execs say are most difficult to find in a single young performer.

Boberg envisioned starting her off as a teen-oriented pop singer, in the hopes that she could one day develop into a more mature female vocalist
along the lines of Celine Dion.

MCA offered her a six-album contract, under which Hennessy would get a $100,000 advance for her first album, plus $5,000 a month in living
expenses while the album was being made. The label would own the recorded music and cover recording and promotion costs.

For Hennessy to make any more money, the label would first have to recoup its advance, its recording costs and half the cost of any music videos,
as well as her living expenses -- meaning the album would have to sell at least 500,000 copies. At that point, Hennessy could collect royalties
amounting to 15 per cent of sales. But she would still owe a cut to a phalanx of producers and managers, as well as other record-company fees --
leaving her with about 80 cents per album.

Such contracts have drawbacks for both sides. Artists can be unceremoniously dropped if they don't live up to expectations. But if they blossom
into superstars, they can use their new leverage to demand that their contracts be rewritten to pay them much more.

In her Dublin kitchen, Hennessy signed the nearly 100-page document as her mother, Marie, captured the moment on videotape. Soon, she and
her father moved to L.A., eventually settling into a two-bedroom apartment in the beachside suburb of Marina del Rey. Hennessy spent three
months recording eight songs. The total tab, including studio time, musicians' salaries, producers' fees and Hennessy's living expenses, was about
$350,000 -- typical for a first pop record.

Unfortunately, neither Hennessy nor MCA were happy with the results. Dorff, who had produced and written songs for Celine Dion and others,
says he thought the album was "contemporary" and made the best use of Hennessy's talents. But Hennessy thought the music was "old-sounding."
Boberg deemed it "too Barbra Streisand" -- too serious for its target teen audience.

At that point, Boberg could have just shelved the project and sent Hennessy on her way. But he was under pressure to come up with a new star,
and he had already invested in someone he believed had talent. In the fickle music business, he says, a performer's success can only be tested in
the marketplace.

For example, in 2000 Boberg took a chance on another unproven pop singer, Shaggy, whose album, Hotshot, went on to sell 4.5 million copies in
the U.S., the second-biggest album of 2001. "You don't now how something is going to do until you see whether the radio gatekeepers accept it,"
he says.

MCA decided to re-record Hennessy's album from scratch. In early 2000, the company retained Gregg Alexander, who had produced hits in
Europe for former Spice Girl Geri Halliwell, to produce four songs. For the rest of the album, MCA turned to L.A. songwriter Danielle Brisebois.

She had never produced an album before, but that didn't bother Hennessy, who says Brisebois became "like a sister." Both had been child
actresses -- Brisebois, 32, had played Archie Bunker's niece Stephanie on All In the Family -- and both had appeared in productions of Annie.

The women experimented in the studio in search of Hennessy's sound and creative direction. They found the teen sang with more emotion when
the lights were turned off. She also seemed to sing better when she wore high heels -- the angle helped her pitch. They taped some vocals at 2
a.m. so Hennessy's voice would be more raspy.

When she wasn't recording, Hennessy babysat around her apartment complex and enjoyed occasional major-label perks, like the surprise
limousine MCA sent to take her and her friends to a Blink-182 rock concert for her 18th birthday.

In April 2001, with the album still unfinished, MCA decided to get Hennessy some notice by releasing her first single, a bouncy tune called I'm
Gonna Blow Your Mind. Its opening lines:

I really really,

I really really,

I really really,

I really really,

I really really

Want to kiss you,

But much more than that,

Boy, I'm gonna blow your mind.

It was a risky choice. MCA realized the song's implied subject matter -- oral sex -- made it unlikely to get much exposure on youth-oriented
outlets deemed important in launching young artists, like the Radio Disney's stations.

But executives felt it was Hennessy's catchiest song. MCA spent $250,000 on a video that showed her dancing in a disco and jumping around
with pals in their sleepwear. On a call-in show, Nickelodeon asked viewers to rate 30 seconds of the video, but the audience was unresponsive.
The video was quickly shelved.

The label also earmarked about $200,000 to hire independent promoters -- middlemen who use their influence with radio programmers to secure
airplay. In addition, MCA spent about $100,000 on "imaging" for Hennessy, including photos, clothes and makeup artists. It sent her on a
$150,000, four-week promotional tour, where she sang at malls over recorded tapes, backed by two dancers, and at station-sponsored concerts.
She bantered with DJs and participated in promotions.

In Little Rock, Ark., a male listener won a dinner date with Hennessy. She recalls him as "the most annoying boy I have ever known in my life."

But the single wasn't catching on. In markets across the country, program directors who met with Hennessy professed to like the song, but then
didn't play it much. The single, it seems, was in an awkward position: The music was a little too mature for regular Top 40 radio and a little too
pop-sounding for adult Top 40.

With the meter running and the album still unfinished, MCA decided last spring to bring in additional management. Miles Copeland, a close ally of
Boberg's who had made a name managing the Police and Sting, signed on as co-manager. Copeland felt the recording process was "out of hand,"
and he exerted pressure to wrap up the album quickly.

By the time the album was done, MCA had spent about $640,000 re-recording it, including Hennessy's living expenses. That brought the total
cost of making the album to $1 million -- high for a first album. But at least, Boberg says, "Everybody thought this was going to be a hit."

Called Ultimate High, it included a few songs from a disc Brisebois had made years before but had never released. The music had a pop sound,
with slightly heavier guitars. The lyrics, mostly written by Brisebois and Alexander, dealt with unrequited young love and sexual themes.

The failure of the first single meant MCA was already behind schedule as the album's Nov. 13 release date approached. While albums in some
genres, like rock, can build slowly in the marketplace, pop releases generally have to hit big fast. To try to build momentum somewhere, the label
got her a Canadian modeling contract and sent her on tour to Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver.

MCA also prepared to release a second single, a feel-good tune called Beautiful You, and spent $500,000 for promotion, bringing its total
investment in the CD to $2.2 million.

But Beautiful You got even less airplay than the first single. With no radio play, MCA decided against a concert tour. Retailers, meanwhile, were
leery of investing much in an album by an artist who seemed to be going nowhere. Music stores had stocked 50,000 copies of Hennessy's two
singles, and sold 7,000. So when it came time to order the album, retailers bought just 10,000. With virtually no radio play or press, there was
little hope for the album as it hit stores.

"It was not rejected by the public," Boberg says. "We just never made it to the public."

In a last-ditch effort to salvage its investment, MCA decided to release Ultimate High in Europe later this year. In January, the label instructed
Hennessy to pack up her apartment and turn in the car they'd provided, and moved her back to Ireland. MCA's European division plans to
reshoot the album's cover and launch a single in March. If the album, due to be released in April, doesn't take off, MCA will re-evaluate.

"If we can't find any market in the world that validates our view she's a talent, then we have to question whether to move forward," Boberg says.

In the meantime, Hennessy is dieting and working out to look good for her European tour. She got a tattoo -- her first -- of an intricate cross on
the small of her back, and has started learning to play guitar.

"This album is going to be huge," she says. "I won't stop until it is."
 
I can summarize the article for you:

Recording industry tried to make another Britney Spears.
People realize this and say hell no, we won't buy it.
They ship woman back to Ireland where she came from.
 
I actually took the time to go to MCA's web site and listen to her stuff. Allthough it's not my kind of music, it's much better than Brittney. This girl can actually sing, and she's cute too!

I bet if she had some air time on the radio she might have done something. Too bad.
 
Interesting read. What amazes me is how the record companies make money when most albums are flops. How can they continue to pay those rock stars and rappers millions of dollars when most cds don't sell more than 500,000 copies? Where does the money come from so that these guys can get their lavish mansions, toys, and 10 luxury cars?
 


<< I can summarize the article for you:

Recording industry tried to make another Britney Spears.
People realize this and say hell no, we won't buy it.
They ship woman back to Ireland where she came from.
>>



thats exactly what the whole article says. And yes i read the whole thing...
 
yup, radio is about as evil as the music industry😛 another interesting case was on 60 minutes a while back, a singer named eva cassidy. awesome pipes, but just like this girl the industry couldnt classify her music..😛 she then dies of cancer and her albums take off like crazy😛
 
The other thing that article talks about is the fact that there is less variety on the radio and it only makes matters worse when people buy their top 40 music at Wal Mart.
 
Give me a break. She has some real talent huh? Oh yeah, like fer sure dude, a song about oral sex. I don't care how much singing talent she has, if she is gonna sell out to have her main song about sucking off a guy, she has no talent to me. Just another Britney wannabee.

Hennessy = BYE BYE BYE!
 


<< Give me a break. She has some real talent huh? Oh yeah, like fer sure dude, a song about oral sex. I don't care how much singing talent she has, if she is gonna sell out to have her main song about sucking off a guy, she has no talent to me. Just another Britney wannabee.

Hennessy = BYE BYE BYE!
>>



😕

Look, her singing voice is very good. It's NOT her fault she had bad management and bad advice. She was only 16 freakin years old at the time. Cut her some slack.
 
The moral of the story is: you can't force trends or what people will like.

So basically the recording companies pay tons of money to try to mold crappy musicians into something better and end up with a high percentage of failures? Nice.

 
If a record company spent 2.2 million to promote someone who had legitimate talent and didn't make money, I would conclude the company did a very poor job of marketing. If they spent the same amount on someone with little or no talent, then I would say they exercised poor judgment.

It makes me wonder why labels exist in the first place. Now that artists can record themselves and post their songs on the internet, the only major hurdle left is discovering that new medium that exposes potential customers to the music. Once that happens, I believe CD purchases will go way down.

Could you imagine an artist spending $20,000 to market songs, and netting 95% of the gross????
 
dude, she's not attractive....

too much makeup.... for a sixteen years old....

perhaps if she get rid of that skanky look and go for an innocent young girl look... keep the hair red....
 
They spent a record amount of $2.2M on her. Recordings, videos, burning of CDs, advertising, etc.

2.2M/500,000=$4.4

Damn, never realised just how cheap new CDs were in the USA!
 
Amazing Americans didn't take the bate on that popDiva bs stunt..they've been suckers for so many other ploys by the recording industry.
 


<< They spent a record amount of $2.2M on her. Recordings, videos, burning of CDs, advertising, etc.

2.2M/500,000=$4.4

Damn, never realised just how cheap new CDs were in the USA!
>>



Isn't it something like 10-15 cents for a mass-produced CD these days?

CK
 


<< They spent a record amount of $2.2M on her. Recordings, videos, burning of CDs, advertising, etc.

2.2M/500,000=$4.4

Damn, never realised just how cheap new CDs were in the USA!
>>



Add the cost of the distributers, and retail markups and you have $14-19 CDs (The normal price range in the US)
 


<<

<< They spent a record amount of $2.2M on her. Recordings, videos, burning of CDs, advertising, etc.

2.2M/500,000=$4.4

Damn, never realised just how cheap new CDs were in the USA!
>>



Isn't it something like 10-15 cents for a mass-produced CD these days?

CK
>>



Not if you count the overhead costs as skyclad did in the post you responded to.

The cost of software and music is not just the cost of the CD itself.
 

500,000 copies minimum are required to bring 80 cents per album for the artist?
Out of thousands of albums released in North America each year by the five major
record companies, fewer than five per cent become profitable?

I'd say that's a pretty sad state of affairs. Either too many people are singing these days - and none too successfully, or the record companies are looking to hard to find pearls in the mud. In any case, recording execs make a load of money, despite the state and quality of the roster.
 
The public is not resistant to talent. This girl has a good voice.

The public is, however, resistant to the "Underage Eurocentric girl wearing next to nothing and singing sexual lyrics over bubble gum pop music" genre.

You can only pump so much music of a specific genre into the market before the public tires of it.
 


<< Interesting read. What amazes me is how the record companies make money when most albums are flops. How can they continue to pay those rock stars and rappers millions of dollars when most cds don't sell more than 500,000 copies? Where does the money come from so that these guys can get their lavish mansions, toys, and 10 luxury cars? >>

The artists make most of their money from touring.
 


<< The public is not resistant to talent. This girl has a good voice.

The public is, however, resistant to the "Underage Eurocentric girl wearing next to nothing and singing sexual lyrics over bubble gum pop music" genre.

You can only pump so much music of a specific genre into the market before the public tires of it.
>>



What is your obssession with "eurocentric?"

Good gawd, go protest the big bad white man somewhere else.
 
Back
Top