New build in trouble..

Varinderpal Singh

Junior Member
Apr 6, 2017
13
1
51
Heys guys,

I have planned my first moderate to high gaming build. I am totally confused regarding my build. I am very strict to my budget of ₹65000. But, I have been not able to figure out the build yet. This is what I have achieved till now -

https://in.pcpartpicker.com/list/GTZff8



I have not been able to figure out the cooler in this build. I want you all much intelligent guys to improve my build in all possible ways you could. There is just one point you need to remember - "The rig should deliever atleast 40-60 or more fps on modern games at medium to high settings."

Just keep the rig under ₹65000. I'll be very grateful.
 

Atom_101

Junior Member
Apr 14, 2017
12
0
6
Go for hyper 212x or 212 led (which ever is cheaper)
Also, I would recommend going for a cheaper processor to get a better GPU if gaming is the primary concern.
 

EliteRetard

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2006
6,490
1,021
136
I agree that a faster GPU is needed for moderate gaming. Looking at prices though, I found that most other lower end CPUs were a poor value and didn't save enough for good upgrades. This lead me to the current budget champion, the G4560 (it comes with a heatsink/fan). For general use and gaming it performs just like an i3 (same 2 core 4 thread) but costs very little. In fact the price of the G4560 is so low I was able to upgrade every other major component. You will want to upgrade the CPU in the next year or two, but that gives you time to save up for an i7.

First thing I upgraded was the video card. Sorting by price it seems the 6GB GTX1060 is the best priced mid-range GPU...and about twice as fast as a 1050ti (avoid the 3GB GTX1060). The next thing was RAM, 8GB is barely enough...and the kit you had selected was very low speed. When sorting the 16GB kits by price, this high speed Corsair stuck out as a much better value than other kits around that price. I was also concerned by the SSD, the low end options you'll be looking at perform better with more flash chips (so bigger drives are faster) and they also perform poorly when full (a bigger drive is less likely to be full). Again looking for the best value, but in the 500GB class, I found the MX300 to be the best option.

Still having plenty of budget left, I looked at the MOBO, which is the foundation of the whole system. While overkill for the G4560 CPU, I stuck with the Z270 chip-set for it's extra features and to support future upgrades (like a 7700k). The ASRock Z270M looks to be an excellent value, and good upgrade over the budget MSI Mortar. The ASRock has all the latest features, the best audio and network chips, and uses high quality electrical components throughout. Since the MOBO is MATX, and the GPU was also a small card I started looking at smaller cases. I found the Silencio to be a nice looking small case that can actually still support a full high end SLI system. The one suggestion I'd have for this case is to move the rear fan to the front, and remove the HDD tray and front filter for better airflow (otherwise the case may not bring in enough fresh air). It looks like this case has a lot of potential with more fans/mods as well, which can make it suitable for almost any type of system.

As the last major component, I looked at the PSU just to see if there were any good value upgrades. I found there was indeed a good upgrade, even if it was overkill. This Antec 750 watt is higher quality and more efficient than the 500w Corsair you had originally (80+ gold vs bronze). While it provides far more power than you need right now, it would allow you to upgrade and OC any CPU/GPU...it could even support a moderate SLI system like 2x 1070/1080's if you were to upgrade in the future (the ASRock MOBO supports dual GPU).

PCPartPicker part list: https://in.pcpartpicker.com/list/7zxHD8

CPU: Intel Pentium G4560 3.5GHz Dual-Core Processor (₹5050.00 @ Amazon India)
Motherboard: ASRock Z270M Extreme4 Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard (₹10160.61 @ Amazon India)
Memory: Corsair Vengeance LED 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 Memory CAS 15-17-17-35 (₹7789.65 @ Amazon India)
Storage: Crucial MX300 525GB 2.5" Solid State Drive (₹11000.00 @ Amazon India)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive (₹3611.00 @ Amazon India)
Video Card: Zotac GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB Mini Video Card (₹14835.48 @ Amazon India)
Case: Cooler Master Silencio 352 MicroATX Mini Tower Case (₹3792.87 @ Amazon India)
Power Supply: Antec TruePower Classic 750W 80+ Gold Certified ATX Power Supply (₹7920.00 @ Amazon India)

Total: ₹64159.61
 

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136
Yeah, spending 2x more on your CPU than your GPU doesn't add up for gaming. In that price range I'd normally recommend looking at the RX 470 for the GPU too, but it seems to be pretty much unavailable in India, and the 570 doesn't seem to have shown up yet either. As such, the GTX 1060 (which on the other hand seems very reasonable!) 6GB is the way to go.

Unlike @EliteRetard, though, I'd suggest you look at an AMD Ryzen platform. While the Pentium G4560 is a great low-end CPU, it doesn't hold a candle to neither the i5-7600K nor a Ryzen 5 1500X (or even the 1400!). While it seems that motherboard availability is a bit of an issue, you can still fit an R5 1500X system within your budget nicely. The 1500X comes with a nice cooler included too.

And while I agree that 8GB of RAM is a bit sparse, it should be okay for a while yet, and RAM is easy to upgrade down the line. RAM speed is on the other hand a contentious issue. There are definitely games today that show clear gains when moving from 2133 to 2400, 2666 or faster. But is it worth spending noticeably more money on in a build with a very limited budget? No. You'll get far more performance in return by putting that money into a faster CPU or GPU. This isn't even up for discussion. My suggested list has 2400MT/s RAM simply because it was roughly the same price as your suggested kit. If you prefer to save 300 rupee, go ahead and go for the cheapest. You probably won't notice the difference.

Oh, and EliteRetard's suggestion of a Z270 motherboard to go with a Pentium CPU is just silly, and a waste of money. The only thing you're getting out of it is higher memory speeds and a potential upgrade path to an i5 or i7 K-series CPU. If you go Pentium, save some more money and get a B250 or H110 motherboard with all the features you need. You likely won't miss anything you're not getting.

OP: I take it you need more than ~500GB of storage, given that you have a 1TB HDD in there? If not, follow EliteRetard's suggestion, and get an MX300 525GB. If you do, your proposed drive is perfectly fine for the price and what's available. If you're judicious about storage use, and only put the games you are actively playing on the SSD, you should be fine with a 240GB drive.

My suggestion:

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Quad-Core Processor (₹16165.00 @ Amazon India)
Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350M-A/CSM Micro ATX AM4 Motherboard (₹8019.00 @ Amazon India)
Memory: Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR4-2400 Memory (₹4063.84 @ Amazon India)
Storage: Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB 2.5" Solid State Drive (₹6339.00 @ Amazon India)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive (₹3611.00 @ Amazon India)
Video Card: Zotac GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB Mini Video Card (₹14835.48 @ Amazon India)
Case: Phanteks ECLIPSE P400 ATX Mid Tower Case (₹4741.26 @ Amazon India)
Power Supply: Corsair Builder 500W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply (₹6119.00 @ Amazon India)
Case Fan: Cooler Master SickleFlow (Red) 69.7 CFM 120mm Fan (₹650.00 @ Amazon India)

Total: ₹64543.58

If you want more RAM, you could go for a Ryzen 5 1400 instead and get 16GB inside of your budget. The 1400 is overclockable, so you won't necessarily lose any performance to speak of, but it does have lower stock clocks and a smaller, weaker cooler included. As such, you'd need to get a third-party cooler for overclocking. And I can guarantee you that this PC will perform better than EliteRetard's one for quite a few years (at least if you stuff 16GB of RAM in there in a year or two). The upgrade path is good too: AMD has promised to use the AM4 socket until at least 2020 - so if you want/need a faster CPU in three years, that's the only thing you'll need to replace. The same goes for SSDs: if you need more SSD space, get another one in a year or two, and keep the one you have. It's a win-win situation. If I were to really nit-pick I would recommend you replace the PSU for something of better quality at the first opportunity, but Corsair units are usually at least okay. It's unlikely to blow up or kill your components, and that's the most important part.
 

EliteRetard

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2006
6,490
1,021
136
I'll agree that a 1500x is probably better than the G4560, but the AM4 platform is really not ready for prime time. If this guy is a real PC enthusiast with lots of experience then yeah maybe it's worth looking at Ryzen.

However you give up a far better system for the slightly better CPU now. It's a trade off I would not make, and why I stuck with Intel.

My system has a much better MOBO, faster and twice as much RAM (for less than twice the price), bigger/better SSD, a much better PSU, and a nice compact case. And you can't nitpick my MOBO choice, since my MOBO+CPU combo is less than your CPU choice alone. If he's going to upgrade the CPU, my system will be far better than the one you have listed...and not just because of the CPU. Ryzen does get close to Intel for gaming, and does offer more cores for the dollar...but there's no arguing that upgrading my system to a 7700k is going to make a better gaming system than yours upgraded to a R7 1700.

The G4560 should hold up with a GTX1060 for a while:
8ahNKXNwcCiQCmcZFmLqFD.png
 

EliteRetard

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2006
6,490
1,021
136
Oh and also, because the Antec TPC 750w PSU I have selected is gold rated, it's more efficient at any wattage load than the Corsair CX500 bronze...despite being further off the 50% power efficiency curve. I just looked up the efficiency numbers.

Basically there's no downside to the Antec vs the Corsair (other than the small bump in price). Better efficiency across the board, better quality parts inside, better voltage regulation, more plugs/future usability, etc.
 

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136
While you're right about the PSU (although I have some reservations about Antec PSUs after hearing some horror stories, I don't know their products even close to well enough to assume that that series is anything but good), I disagree about the CPU choice. Why? It's actually rather simple. Most games today are single threaded or lightly threaded, but the trend is towards more multi-threading across the board. Given similar IPC and clock speeds, the Ryzen 5 1500X and your Pentium will perform similarly in single and lightly threaded games, while the 1500X will pull away in more heavily threaded games. As games get patched to better utilize Ryzen's architecture, this difference will increase. And when it comes to upgrades, sure, a 7700k is a better gaming CPU than a 1700 - but neither of those will be relevant in 2-3 years when a CPU upgrade might be relevant. The 1500X will do more than fine until then, and by then, there will be far better AM4 CPUs out, that the OP can then simply slot into his motherboard and get on with life. With Intel, on the other hand, they'll be lucky to have one more generation on the same socket. The options then would either be a full platform upgrade (expensive), a used CPU (cheap, but risky) or a "new" three-year-old product (awful value).

Oh, and unless you're either overclocking or insist on running your RAM very quickly, I haven't heard of many problems with basic Ryzen builds. Are there teething problems? Of course. Have there been motherboards with awful, awful bugs? Absolutely. But for plug-and-play systems with mid-range components, I've yet to hear of any significant issues arising.

As for the "much better mobo", how so, in any way that is relevant and matters to the OP? The one I suggested has plenty of IO, including m.2 and USB 3.1, and supports overclocking. Sure, it's not a fancy-pants premium overclocking motherboard, but so what? That just means you're not paying through the nose for frills, bells and whistles. The VRMs on your board might be better, but that really won't matter unless the OP suddenly buys a 7700K and starts overclocking the snot out of it. Which won't happen with the kind of budget we're talking here. While my motherboard choice isn't extremely cheap in comparison, that's more to do with the relatively small selection of Ryzen motherboards out there.

As for the case, I didn't look at it, as I consider that mostly an aesthetic choice. And your cheaper case goes a long way to fitting your more expensive PSU into my proposed build, so there's that (given that my motherboard is mATX too). And while I agree that a 525GB SSD is better than a 240GB (well, duh), I disagree with prioritizing SSD space over CPU performance (up to a point, of course). Order of priorities for gaming: GPU -> CPU -> SSD -> RAM. And 8GB of RAM will do for now - I would prioritize other parts (that affect performance more noticeably) first, and it's an easy and cheap upgrade down the line.

The main point is still this: your system is okay, but not really future proof. There are quite a few games already out where a 2c4t CPU will choke. Not many, but they exist, and more are coming. Even if a mid-range GPU balances this out somewhat (so that the bottleneck is more often the GPU), that doesn't change the fact that the Pentium will start to fall behind far quicker than the Ryzen 5. On top of that, the upgrade path (as in: upgrading down the road, not immediately, which is a completely illogical concept to begin with) for any Intel platform is limited at best, while AMD will be developing CPUs for AM4 until at least 2020. That's a perfect time frame for a CPU upgrade. And you can pretty much bet that frequency is one of the first things they'll be improving in upcoming revisions.
 

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,656
4,595
75
Dropping down to a Pentium feels like overkill in the other direction. How about:

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: *Intel Core i5-7400 3.0GHz Quad-Core Processor (₹14398.00 @ Amazon India)
Motherboard: *Gigabyte GA-B250M-D3H Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard (₹5757.39 @ Amazon India)
Memory: *Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 Memory (₹7615.55 @ Amazon India)
Storage: Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB 2.5" Solid State Drive (₹6339.00 @ Amazon India)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive (₹3611.00 @ Amazon India)
Video Card: *Zotac GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB Mini Video Card (₹14835.48 @ Amazon India)
Case: Phanteks ECLIPSE P400 ATX Mid Tower Case (₹4741.26 @ Amazon India)
Power Supply: *EVGA 430W 80+ Certified ATX Power Supply (₹5237.00 @ Amazon India)
Case Fan: Cooler Master SickleFlow (Red) 69.7 CFM 120mm Fan (₹650.00 @ Amazon India)
Total: ₹63184.68
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
*Lowest price parts chosen from parametric criteria
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-04-23 05:58 IST+0530


Yeah, it's not the perfect PSU, but it's not too bad.
 

EliteRetard

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2006
6,490
1,021
136
Antec has many designs/OEMs and I'm sure there's been a bad unit or two (like most any brand).
However the Antec TPC 750 gold is a great unit, made by SeaSonic one of the best PSU manufacturers:
http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story&reid=382

I also agree about games becoming more multi-threaded...over the next few years. However, by the time that becomes an issue the R5 1500x won't be much better than the G4560. And a GTX1060 wont be as good either. When it comes time to upgrade, your system will be low end...especially with 8GB RAM and a tiny SSD. You claim an RX1500x will be great, and a 7770k will be irrelevant...I'm just going to laugh at that comment. There's no argument you can make that'll put a 1500x ahead of a 7700k even in 2-3 years. With your system he'd have to throw away ₹26,567.87 to replace important parts just to bring it up to par with my system. That massive difference could easily afford a new video card.

And he wouldn't need to have all that money at once with my system. He could get a 7700k in a year, keep everything else and still be good for a year after that. At that point he could grab a new mid-range GPU (say a GTX1260) and along with the 7700k, 16GB fast RAM (mid range speed by then), 500GB SSD, and a nice PSU, still have a good mid range system. With your build, he's stuck with a low end system for a year or two until he has saved up enough to replace the CPU/SSD/RAM and wont be able to afford a new GPU.

The 1500x isn't going to make the GTX1060 so much faster in the next year (or even 2 or 3) that it will matter, or offset the much lower quality system overall.

Not only does my MOBO have better capacitors/electronics (important and relevant), but it also has a much better audio and network chip (important and relevant), USB C and 3.1 10Gb/s (important and relevant), has an M.2 WiFi slot (could be relevant), and supports SLI (could be relevant).

You say my system isn't future proof...but every major component is (except the CPU) much better than yours. In either system the CPU is low end, so it doesn't matter if yours is 10% better in the future. When it comes to future proofing, your system needs significant renovation along with a new CPU, while mine just needs the CPU. Along with having the pleasure of an overall better system for a few years, all the money he saves not replacing parts on my system can be put into a better GPU...making my system much more future proof (with future parts).

I'd make the same argument with the i5-7400 system above. We all agree that a gaming system needs a decent mid-range GPU (like the GTX1060) and we all agree he can't afford a high end CPU to go with it. We also all agree that games are going to get more multi-threaded, and low end 4 core CPUs today will need to be replaced in a few years. If all of that is true, then it makes absolutely no sense to sacrifice every other component of his system to pay more for a CPU that we all agree will need to be replaced anyway. Especially if that more expensive CPU will offer little to no benefit to gaming with the GTX1060 now or in the next few years.

Will a G4560 hold back a GTX1060? Yep, but so will a 1500x...less so an i5-7400, for now. Will they all need to be replaced in a few years? Yep.
How about 8GB slow RAM, will that be an issue? Yep, a bit right now...worse in the future. How about 16GB higher speed? Nope, should be good for the next few years. How about a small slow SSD? Already an issue for many, in a few years it'll feel like a 64GB SSD today. 500GB SSD? Should be good for 2-3 years.

I'll pause for responses now.
 

EliteRetard

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2006
6,490
1,021
136
Actually I want to add one more bit, though it's a rumor.

These rumors suggest the next 1151 CPU's will offer a 6 core 12 thread variant, and may work on current Z270 MOBOs.
If that were to happen, he'd have an even better upgrade option than a 7700k.

Either way, the 4c 8t 7700K (especially with OC) should still be plenty relevant in 2-3 years...just like a 4c 4t 3570k is decent today (or even a 2500k).

If he had the budget, I'd certainly recommend a good 6+ core CPU (like the R5 1600) for a mid-range system today. But not if it means a much worse GPU and/or system.
 

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136
You know, at times you seem to be quite out of touch with reality, and you have a habit of applying very selectively skewed logic to your arguments.

a) Even if the Ryzen 5 1500X is the second-lowest Ryzen SKU to be launched, it is by no means a low-end CPU, and it's not even remotely comparable to the Pentium G4560. IPC is similar between the two, the 1500X runs at 3.5-3.7GHz (3.9 with XFR) versus 3.5 of the G4560 (and 3.0-3.5 of the i5-7400). In other words, in these measures they are reasonably similar, with the Intel CPUs winning out slightly due to slightly higher IPC and software being better optimized for the architecture. Then comes the difference: the G4560 is 2c4t, the i5-7400 is 4c4t, and the 1500X is 4c8t. That's twice as many cores and threads as the G4560. Will that make a big difference in a year or two or three? Of course it will.

b)
You claim an RX1500x will be great, and a 7770k will be irrelevant.
No I don't. I'd suggest you reread that so that you perhaps could understand that I'm talking about them in two different contexts, but I'll spell it out for you just to make sure: in a few years, the 1500X will be a far better CPU than the G4560. It still won't compare to an i7-7700K for gaming, but it'll still be perfectly usable (while chances are the Pentium will not). When it comes to upgrading, on the other hand, the 7700K will probably still be okay-to-good at that point, but (partially due to 6-core Intel chips being rumored) it will more or less be irrelevant. If we're talking 3-or-so years down the line (which is a very reasonable time frame for a CPU upgrade), it'll be irrelevant because Intel will long since have abandoned the Z270/LGA1151 platform. Thus, the only upgrade path will be, as I said, either buying used, buying old and semi-outdated stock, or replacing the motherboard as well. While with a 1500X, the only thing that needs replacing is the CPU. Everything else can stay, unless the OP also wants a GPU upgrade by then. And at that point the OP would have far more choice: want 8 cores 16 threads? Go for it! Much higher clocked Ryzen SKUs will no doubt be out in two-three years too. At no point did I argue that a 1500X would outperform the 7700K in three years - you should take a look at your reading comprehension if that's what you got out of what I wrote. Not to mention that you're suggesting "Buy a PC now, and upgrade the CPU next year!" while mine won't need that for at least two or three. Minimum. Oh, and just to add some perspective: older Intel chips tend not to drop much in price as they age. The cheapest 6700K on in.pcpartpicker.com right now is more expensive than the cheapest 7700K ... Oh, and as you can already get 6c12t Ryzen CPUs for ₹18 000, chances are he'll save another ₹10 000 compared to an intel 6c12t when that time comes.

c) You keep harping on the RAM, as if adding another 8GB of RAM in a year or two is comparable to replacing the CPU in a year. To quote you: I'm just going to laugh at that.

d)
With your system he'd have to throw away ₹26,567.87 to replace important parts just to bring it up to par with my system.
What on earth are you on about? Where are you getting that sum from? Motherboard, RAM, PSU and ... what? case? SSD? The thing here is, that's completely dumb. Upgrading to a larger SSD doesn't in any way require throwing out the first SSD. So if he goes for my build, and buys a 500GB SSD in a year, that'll be a total of 740GB SSD space compared to your 525GB. I'd call that a win. And yes, making do with 240GB for a year is perfectly manageable. And again: replacing the motherboard isn't necessary unless it should somehow fail. Just not at all. It has good enough components, all necessary features, and is made by a manufacturer known for quality. Same goes for the RAM - you just add more, and that's that, no need to throw away anything. With both that and the SSD, holding off on buying big now might even be economically smart, as chances are SSD and RAM prices will have started dropping again in a year. As for the PSU, I of course agree that a Seasonic-built gold-rated PSU is a lot better than a Corsair Builder series.

e) Let's look at price of ownership and upgrades over, say, three years:
Your proposal:
Purchase price: ~₹65 000
CPU upgrade in one year: ~₹25 000 (I'm being generous here btw)
GPU upgrade in two-three years: ~₹20 000
Total price: ₹110 000, with a great CPU starting one year out.

My proposal: Purchase price: ~₹65 000
RAM and SSD upgrade in one year: ~₹10 000
GPU Upgrade in two-three years: ~₹20 000
Total price: ₹95 000. With more total SSD space, and room for a far better CPU upgrade down the line (which he could easily put those remaining ₹15 000 into and end up with a far better system that would last another GPU upgrade or two).

My suggestion a) doesn't require a huge upgrade in just a year (you're suggesting upgrading to a CPU 1/3 of the total build budget, after all!), b) can be upgraded more at will/when the OP can afford it/not out of pure necessity (as the components in question are modular and not system critical), and c) is cheaper in total. I'm drawing the line at three years simply because in my mind that represents ~half the lifespan of my proposed build, and the sweet spot for a CPU upgrade with AMD - while with Intel, he'd either have to settle for an older CPU or replace the motherboard as well. Either way, you end up paying more with Intel.

f)
He could get a 7700k in a year, keep everything else and still be good for a year after that. At that point he could grab a new mid-range GPU (say a GTX1260) and along with the 7700k, 16GB fast RAM (mid range speed by then), 500GB SSD, and a nice PSU, still have a good mid range system.

Again: don't be daft. First off, there's no reason to suspect more than 16GB of RAM will be necessary in 2-3 years, not really in 5-6 either. 8GB has gone from "plenty" to "still enough" in the last decade or so, with system RAM demand growth slowing down. The chances that they'll more than double in 5-6 years are slim at best. And why would he need to replace the PSU in three years? After all, what you're saying here is "Buy this ₹65 000 system, you'll only need to spend as much again in the next two years to keep it working!" - after all, withouth the expensive CPU upgrade in a year, your system is a dud.

g)
Not only does my MOBO have better capacitors/electronics (important and relevant), but it also has a much better audio and network chip (important and relevant), USB C and 3.1 10Gb/s (important and relevant), has an M.2 WiFi slot (could be relevant), and supports SLI (could be relevant).
As long as all capacitors are solid-state (and not liquid electrolytic) they'll last for ages. I wouldn't worry about that. Same goes for the VRM, unless he suddenly becomes a professional overclocker. USB-C is a point, though, but that's what adapters are for. USB 3.1G2 on the other hand, isn't. Someone with a budget as strict as this won't be buying RAIDed external SSDs in the coming years. And usb 3.1G1 works just fine for everything else. Better audio might be a point, but that depends on what he's connecting to it. A good audio solution won't help low-end headphones or speakers sound better. M.2 WiFi could be nice, but he hasn't mentioned as a wish or requirement. And SLI support outside of the high end is just silly. When the time for a GPU upgrade comes, buying a new, single GPU will always be better value than buying an old GPU to add to the existing one.

And one last point: resale value when upgrading. In that metric, the 1500X would, again, crush the G4560 no matter if the CPU upgrade happens in one year or three.


But you do have a point with the PSU. As such, I've updated my list with your case and PSU suggestions. Yes, it's now ₹400 over budget. Hopefully that's within the OPs margin of error.

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Quad-Core Processor (₹16165.00 @ Amazon India)
Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350M-A/CSM Micro ATX AM4 Motherboard (₹8019.00 @ Amazon India)
Memory: Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR4-2400 Memory (₹4063.84 @ Amazon India)
Storage: Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB 2.5" Solid State Drive (₹6339.00 @ Amazon India)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive (₹3611.00 @ Amazon India)
Video Card: Zotac GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB Mini Video Card (₹14835.48 @ Amazon India)
Case: Cooler Master Silencio 352 MicroATX Mini Tower Case (₹3792.87 @ Amazon India)
Power Supply: Antec TruePower Classic 750W 80+ Gold Certified ATX Power Supply (₹7920.00 @ Amazon India)
Case Fan: Cooler Master SickleFlow (Red) 69.7 CFM 120mm Fan (₹650.00 @ Amazon India)

Total: ₹65396.19
 

Atom_101

Junior Member
Apr 14, 2017
12
0
6
You know, at times you seem to be quite out of touch with reality, and you have a habit of applying very selectively skewed logic to your arguments.

a) Even if the Ryzen 5 1500X is the second-lowest Ryzen SKU to be launched, it is by no means a low-end CPU, and it's not even remotely comparable to the Pentium G4560. IPC is similar between the two, the 1500X runs at 3.5-3.7GHz (3.9 with XFR) versus 3.5 of the G4560 (and 3.0-3.5 of the i5-7400). In other words, in these measures they are reasonably similar, with the Intel CPUs winning out slightly due to slightly higher IPC and software being better optimized for the architecture. Then comes the difference: the G4560 is 2c4t, the i5-7400 is 4c4t, and the 1500X is 4c8t. That's twice as many cores and threads as the G4560. Will that make a big difference in a year or two or three? Of course it will.

b)
No I don't. I'd suggest you reread that so that you perhaps could understand that I'm talking about them in two different contexts, but I'll spell it out for you just to make sure: in a few years, the 1500X will be a far better CPU than the G4560. It still won't compare to an i7-7700K for gaming, but it'll still be perfectly usable (while chances are the Pentium will not). When it comes to upgrading, on the other hand, the 7700K will probably still be okay-to-good at that point, but (partially due to 6-core Intel chips being rumored) it will more or less be irrelevant. If we're talking 3-or-so years down the line (which is a very reasonable time frame for a CPU upgrade), it'll be irrelevant because Intel will long since have abandoned the Z270/LGA1151 platform. Thus, the only upgrade path will be, as I said, either buying used, buying old and semi-outdated stock, or replacing the motherboard as well. While with a 1500X, the only thing that needs replacing is the CPU. Everything else can stay, unless the OP also wants a GPU upgrade by then. And at that point the OP would have far more choice: want 8 cores 16 threads? Go for it! Much higher clocked Ryzen SKUs will no doubt be out in two-three years too. At no point did I argue that a 1500X would outperform the 7700K in three years - you should take a look at your reading comprehension if that's what you got out of what I wrote. Not to mention that you're suggesting "Buy a PC now, and upgrade the CPU next year!" while mine won't need that for at least two or three. Minimum. Oh, and just to add some perspective: older Intel chips tend not to drop much in price as they age. The cheapest 6700K on in.pcpartpicker.com right now is more expensive than the cheapest 7700K ... Oh, and as you can already get 6c12t Ryzen CPUs for ₹18 000, chances are he'll save another ₹10 000 compared to an intel 6c12t when that time comes.

c) You keep harping on the RAM, as if adding another 8GB of RAM in a year or two is comparable to replacing the CPU in a year. To quote you: I'm just going to laugh at that.

d)
What on earth are you on about? Where are you getting that sum from? Motherboard, RAM, PSU and ... what? case? SSD? The thing here is, that's completely dumb. Upgrading to a larger SSD doesn't in any way require throwing out the first SSD. So if he goes for my build, and buys a 500GB SSD in a year, that'll be a total of 740GB SSD space compared to your 525GB. I'd call that a win. And yes, making do with 240GB for a year is perfectly manageable. And again: replacing the motherboard isn't necessary unless it should somehow fail. Just not at all. It has good enough components, all necessary features, and is made by a manufacturer known for quality. Same goes for the RAM - you just add more, and that's that, no need to throw away anything. With both that and the SSD, holding off on buying big now might even be economically smart, as chances are SSD and RAM prices will have started dropping again in a year. As for the PSU, I of course agree that a Seasonic-built gold-rated PSU is a lot better than a Corsair Builder series.

e) Let's look at price of ownership and upgrades over, say, three years:
Your proposal:
Purchase price: ~₹65 000
CPU upgrade in one year: ~₹25 000 (I'm being generous here btw)
GPU upgrade in two-three years: ~₹20 000
Total price: ₹110 000, with a great CPU starting one year out.

My proposal: Purchase price: ~₹65 000
RAM and SSD upgrade in one year: ~₹10 000
GPU Upgrade in two-three years: ~₹20 000
Total price: ₹95 000. With more total SSD space, and room for a far better CPU upgrade down the line (which he could easily put those remaining ₹15 000 into and end up with a far better system that would last another GPU upgrade or two).

My suggestion a) doesn't require a huge upgrade in just a year (you're suggesting upgrading to a CPU 1/3 of the total build budget, after all!), b) can be upgraded more at will/when the OP can afford it/not out of pure necessity (as the components in question are modular and not system critical), and c) is cheaper in total. I'm drawing the line at three years simply because in my mind that represents ~half the lifespan of my proposed build, and the sweet spot for a CPU upgrade with AMD - while with Intel, he'd either have to settle for an older CPU or replace the motherboard as well. Either way, you end up paying more with Intel.

f)

Again: don't be daft. First off, there's no reason to suspect more than 16GB of RAM will be necessary in 2-3 years, not really in 5-6 either. 8GB has gone from "plenty" to "still enough" in the last decade or so, with system RAM demand growth slowing down. The chances that they'll more than double in 5-6 years are slim at best. And why would he need to replace the PSU in three years? After all, what you're saying here is "Buy this ₹65 000 system, you'll only need to spend as much again in the next two years to keep it working!" - after all, withouth the expensive CPU upgrade in a year, your system is a dud.

g)
As long as all capacitors are solid-state (and not liquid electrolytic) they'll last for ages. I wouldn't worry about that. Same goes for the VRM, unless he suddenly becomes a professional overclocker. USB-C is a point, though, but that's what adapters are for. USB 3.1G2 on the other hand, isn't. Someone with a budget as strict as this won't be buying RAIDed external SSDs in the coming years. And usb 3.1G1 works just fine for everything else. Better audio might be a point, but that depends on what he's connecting to it. A good audio solution won't help low-end headphones or speakers sound better. M.2 WiFi could be nice, but he hasn't mentioned as a wish or requirement. And SLI support outside of the high end is just silly. When the time for a GPU upgrade comes, buying a new, single GPU will always be better value than buying an old GPU to add to the existing one.

And one last point: resale value when upgrading. In that metric, the 1500X would, again, crush the G4560 no matter if the CPU upgrade happens in one year or three.


But you do have a point with the PSU. As such, I've updated my list with your case and PSU suggestions. Yes, it's now ₹400 over budget. Hopefully that's within the OPs margin of error.

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Quad-Core Processor (₹16165.00 @ Amazon India)
Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350M-A/CSM Micro ATX AM4 Motherboard (₹8019.00 @ Amazon India)
Memory: Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR4-2400 Memory (₹4063.84 @ Amazon India)
Storage: Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB 2.5" Solid State Drive (₹6339.00 @ Amazon India)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive (₹3611.00 @ Amazon India)
Video Card: Zotac GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB Mini Video Card (₹14835.48 @ Amazon India)
Case: Cooler Master Silencio 352 MicroATX Mini Tower Case (₹3792.87 @ Amazon India)
Power Supply: Antec TruePower Classic 750W 80+ Gold Certified ATX Power Supply (₹7920.00 @ Amazon India)
Case Fan: Cooler Master SickleFlow (Red) 69.7 CFM 120mm Fan (₹650.00 @ Amazon India)

Total: ₹65396.19
Why would he need a 750w PSU? I think he can go for an m12ii 520. The money saved can be used to get an i5 7600( Rs18,479) if he doesn't want a ryzen just yet.
 

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136
Why would he need a 750w PSU? I think he can go for an m12ii 520. The money saved can be used to get an i5 7600( Rs18,479) if he doesn't want a ryzen just yet.
I totally agree on that, I just couldn't be bothered looking through the PSU section at PCPartpicker to find a better alternative (especially since I hadn't even heard of half the stuff on that list), and went with EliteRetard's choice. 750W would be complete and utter overkill - this PC will likely not need more than 300W ever. If the m12ii is available for a decent price, that should be a good choice.


Edit: PCPartpicker doesn't have a price for the m12ii 520W, so I guess that point is moot.
 

Atom_101

Junior Member
Apr 14, 2017
12
0
6
I totally agree on that, I just couldn't be bothered looking through the PSU section at PCPartpicker to find a better alternative (especially since I hadn't even heard of half the stuff on that list), and went with EliteRetard's choice. 750W would be complete and utter overkill - this PC will likely not need more than 300W ever. If the m12ii is available for a decent price, that should be a good choice.


Edit: PCPartpicker doesn't have a price for the m12ii 520W, so I guess that point is moot.

He can get the s12ii from ebay.in for Rs 5950 ( http://www.ebay.in/itm/111473113364?aff_source=Sok-Goog)
and cheaper if he buys locally. I know because I am also in India :)
The m12ii is tough to find though.
 

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136
He can get the s12ii from ebay.in for Rs 5950 ( http://www.ebay.in/itm/111473113364?aff_source=Sok-Goog)
and cheaper if he buys locally. I know because I am also in India :)
The m12ii is tough to find though.
That would be an excellent choice, then. Good manufacturer, good quality, cheap, okay efficiency, and plenty of power. Saving ₹2000 off the budget is nice too - either pocket the savings or find a way to squeeze another 2000 out from somewhere to get the 525GB MX300 in there right off the bat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Varinderpal Singh

Varinderpal Singh

Junior Member
Apr 6, 2017
13
1
51
That would be an excellent choice, then. Good manufacturer, good quality, cheap, okay efficiency, and plenty of power. Saving ₹2000 off the budget is nice too - either pocket the savings or find a way to squeeze another 2000 out from somewhere to get the 525GB MX300 in there right off the bat.
@Valantar , @Atom_101 , @EliteRetard. After all your talks, I have found this parts list to be most suitable. Note that the prices indicated in list are not from amazon. These are from other stores ike primeabgb, mdcomputers and theitdepot.

CPU - Ryzen 1600. (₹16529)
Mobo - ASUS prime B350-A. (₹7110)
RAM - Kingston HyperX fury 1×8 GB 2400 Mhz.
(₹4449)
Storage: Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB 2.5" Solid State Drive (₹6000)
Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive (₹3611.00 @ Amazon India).
GPU - MSI ARMOR OC RX 570 4GB. (₹17075)
Case - Corsair carbide series spec - 01 Blue led (₹2999)
TOTAL - ₹58,402.
I might get these parts even cheaper at local stores in three months or so.

Now, my only concern is PSU which I will looking for few more days. I'll let you guys know.
Any suggestions ?

Also, I have no upgrade plans on this build for next two or three years. So, I have got only this time to get my build perfect.
Appreciate all your help
 
Last edited:

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136
Wow, if you can get a Ryzen 5 1600 in there, that's great. That would mean no need for a CPU upgrade for quite some time - I'm getting a 1600X soon, and I'm hoping to keep it close to as long as my current Core2Quad (which I've had for 9 years soon). A 1600 should last you 4-5 years minimum. As for getting an RX 570 vs. a GTX 1060: the 1060 is faster in most/all DX11 titles (it's faster than or equal to the 580), but slower or equal in DX12 titles. If you can get a 1060 for the price listed above (₹14835), I'd choose that instead - but if not, the 570 is a good card too :)

If you get the Seasonic S12II 520W you'd have a great mid-range gaming PC going for you. A well-balanced system, and the only upgrade I'd think necessary in the short-to-mid term is adding another 8GB stick of RAM if you start seeing RAM-related slowdowns. And you'd be well inside your budget :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Varinderpal Singh

Varinderpal Singh

Junior Member
Apr 6, 2017
13
1
51
Wow, if you can get a Ryzen 5 1600 in there, that's great. That would mean no need for a CPU upgrade for quite some time - I'm getting a 1600X soon, and I'm hoping to keep it close to as long as my current Core2Quad (which I've had for 9 years soon). A 1600 should last you 4-5 years minimum. As for getting an RX 570 vs. a GTX 1060: the 1060 is faster in most/all DX11 titles (it's faster than or equal to the 580), but slower or equal in DX12 titles. If you can get a 1060 for the price listed above (₹14835), I'd choose that instead - but if not, the 570 is a good card too :)

If you get the Seasonic S12II 520W you'd have a great mid-range gaming PC going for you. A well-balanced system, and the only upgrade I'd think necessary in the short-to-mid term is adding another 8GB stick of RAM if you start seeing RAM-related slowdowns. And you'd be well inside your budget :)

Thank you. I'll be wait for vega architecture and then I'll be taking the decision.
Appreciate all your help.
 

EliteRetard

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2006
6,490
1,021
136
Wow, if you can get a Ryzen 5 1600 in there, that's great. That would mean no need for a CPU upgrade for quite some time
*snip*
As for getting an RX 570 vs. a GTX 1060: the 6GB 1060 is faster in most titles (it's faster than or equal to the 8GB 580), If you can get a 6GB 1060 for the price listed above (₹14835), I'd choose that instead. The 570 is a good budget card, but it should never cost more than a GTX1060 6GB, even an 8GB 580 shouldn't exceed the price of a 6GB 1060.
*snip*
The only upgrade I'd think necessary in the short-to-mid term is adding another 8GB stick of RAM

I wanted to pop in to say I agree with this. I have no issues with an AMD system if you can afford a Ryzen 1600 or better and still get a mid-range GPU. A 4GB 470/570 is acceptable for the right low price, but a 6GB 1060 or 8GB 480/580 would be better if they are near the same price.

I also wanted to explain my suggestion for the Antec 750watt PSU, which was due to my lack of pricing information in a foreign market. Using only the one pricing tool, I found that Antec PSU to be the best and cheapest upgrade over the original low end Corsair PSU. I made it clear that 750 watt was overkill, but I had not found a better option between the price of those two units.

If he can get a quality PSU, in a more reasonable wattage, for much less than the Antec I suggested...well then certainly do that instead (like that Seasonic 520w).
But I don't think he should go with the lowest end of units to save a buck either. That particular Corsair 500w was not good for a gaming system.

And if you are waiting a little while before ordering, hopefully the AMD ecosystem will be a bit better overall and you'll have more options. I still think a slightly better MOBO would be nice, even just to have a nice audio chip (ALC 1150 or 1220) and a good Intel network chip (much better than Realtek or Killer brand). And usually these nicer MOBOs have better electronics and heatsinks too, which helps to make everything last longer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valantar

Varinderpal Singh

Junior Member
Apr 6, 2017
13
1
51
I wanted to pop in to say I agree with this. I have no issues with an AMD system if you can afford a Ryzen 1600 or better and still get a mid-range GPU. A 4GB 470/570 is acceptable for the right low price, but a 6GB 1060 or 8GB 480/580 would be better if they are near the same price.


The price you see on zotac gtx 1060 6gb is without any customs or shipping. Check this out - http://www.amazon.in/dp/B01IA9FEOO/?tag=pcp03-21

So, what should I do -
1. Should I stick to rx570 and r5 1600?
2. Should I lower down to r5 1500x and get a gtx 1060 6gb ?
 

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136

The price you see on zotac gtx 1060 6gb is without any customs or shipping. Check this out - http://www.amazon.in/dp/B01IA9FEOO/?tag=pcp03-21

So, what should I do -
1. Should I stick to rx570 and r5 1600?
2. Should I lower down to r5 1500x and get a gtx 1060 6gb ?
In that case, I'd go for the 1600 and 570. You're likely to want/need a GPU upgrade in 3-ish years anyhow, and the difference between a 1060 and 570 aren't large enough to affect that noticeably. As such, I'd rather go for the slightly weaker GPU and stronger CPU, as the latter is far more likely to be good enough three (and far more!) years. GPU requirements rise far quicker than cpu requirements, so setting a solid, long-lasting baseline is actually possible for CPU performance, while not for GPU performance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Varinderpal Singh

Varinderpal Singh

Junior Member
Apr 6, 2017
13
1
51
In that case, I'd go for the 1600 and 570. You're likely to want/need a GPU upgrade in 3-ish years anyhow, and the difference between a 1060 and 570 aren't large enough to affect that noticeably. As such, I'd rather go for the slightly weaker GPU and stronger CPU, as the latter is far more likely to be good enough three (and far more!) years. GPU requirements rise far quicker than cpu requirements, so setting a solid, long-lasting baseline is actually possible for CPU performance, while not for GPU performance.
Should i wait for vega architecture gpu's ?
 

Valantar

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2014
1,792
508
136
Should i wait for vega architecture gpu's ?
Not a bad idea, but they won't launch in that price range. Polaris is still going to be AMDs entry level-to-midrange chip for at least another generation/year. Vega is for the upper midrange and high end, and will be priced accordingly. The launch of the 580 at $230 just days ago confirms that. It might be that the Vega launch pushes prices in general downwards some, though.
 

EliteRetard

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2006
6,490
1,021
136
In that case, I'd go for the 1600 and 570. *snip*

I concur.

The 570 is still a lot better than a 1050ti, and is considered a good medium-high 1080p card (at 40-60fps).
In fact, I'd say the Ryzen 1600 is a better choice than the 7600k as well...
So these two together will make a better gaming system than what you had in your first post.
 

Varinderpal Singh

Junior Member
Apr 6, 2017
13
1
51
@Valantar
I concur.

The 570 is still a lot better than a 1050ti, and is considered a good medium-high 1080p card (at 40-60fps).
In fact, I'd say the Ryzen 1600 is a better choice than the 7600k as well...
So these two together will make a better gaming system than what you had in your first post.

So, My final build is something like this after finding a psu -
https://in.pcpartpicker.com/list/bQpFr7

Still, my only concern is psu. Is that good or should I find some other options ?