**NEW** BIRTH CONTROL PILL

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Contraceptive pill for men.

So I guess it makes you shoot blanks?

Men could soon be able to use a 'male Pill' that has no side effects, scientists have revealed.

The chemical implant acts as a contraceptive but does not change the balance of a man's sex hormones.

Scientists have discovered a substance that can temporarily block the development of sperm without altering testosterone levels and without causing unwanted side effects.

They hope human trials of a new contraceptive for men based on their discovery could begin within a few years.

Other versions of the 'male Pill' are already in development but work by altering hormone levels in the man's body.

In trials so far these have produced no worrying side effects - however scientists think men may still worry about whether introducing female hormones could harm their virility in some way.

The new approach would therefore avoid this problem. The common perception is that few women would actually believe a man who said he was on the Pill.

However a study published in the British Medical Journal in 2000 found that only two per cent of women said they would not trust their partner to take a male Pill.

Several teams of scientists have therefore been working on trying to develop an equivalent of the female Pill for men.

Until now this has involved using hormones to try to prevent sperm production.

But the new approach reported in the latest edition of the journal Nature Medicine involves a substance called adherin.

It works by interfering with the way cells in the testes help nurture the development of mature sperm.

It blocks the normal bond which develops between immature sperm and tissue called Sertoli cells. This then stops the cells developing into mature sperm which are capable of fertilising an egg.

A study found that when given to rats, sperm production dropped to such low levels as to render them infertile.

However once the drug was stopped, the animals' sperm production soon returned to normal.

Lead researcher Chuen Yan Cheng of the Population Council in New York said this would be vital for any kind of pill to become acceptable to men.

"If you give the consumer the peace of mind that their fertility will be restored and that their hormones are not going to be affected, they may feel that it is safer to use this contraceptive," he said.

Adherin on its own is known to have toxic effects on the body, but the team overcame this problem by ensuring it would only attach to one cell in the body - the Sertoli cells.

The team tested it on vital organs such as the kidneys, liver, heart and brain, and found it had no harmful side effects.

Dr Cheng and his team hope their finding will lead to a male contraceptive - although say it is likely to be an implant rather than a pill as the tablet would be broken down in the digestive tract.

Dr Cheng said the approach taken by other researchers of using hormone-based contraceptives was not wrong. However he said it was important to give people a choice.

Earlier this year researchers working on a hormonal-based male contraceptive said an implant or injection could be available within five years.

Another study, published in the Lancet found that men given a hormonal-based contraceptive drug saw their sperm count return to normal just over three months after they stopped using it.
 

Savij

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,233
0
71
All the sex you can handle and no possibilty of babies? Where is the downside?
 

SmoochyTX

Lifer
Apr 19, 2003
13,615
0
0
Imagine how high the percentage of effectiveness if both the male and female in the relationship (LTR) were on the pills.
 

z0mb13

Lifer
May 19, 2002
18,106
1
76
is this a take one pill before sex kind of thing, or more of like the birth control pill for women?
 

iamaelephant

Diamond Member
Jul 25, 2004
3,816
1
81
I can't even remember to take my vitamins in the morning. No way I would trust myself to take a contraceptive pill daily.
 

SmoochyTX

Lifer
Apr 19, 2003
13,615
0
0
Originally posted by: z0mb13
is this a take one pill before sex kind of thing, or more of like the birth control pill for women?

Dr Cheng and his team hope their finding will lead to a male contraceptive - although say it is likely to be an implant rather than a pill as the tablet would be broken down in the digestive tract.

Dr Cheng said the approach taken by other researchers of using hormone-based contraceptives was not wrong. However he said it was important to give people a choice.

Earlier this year researchers working on a hormonal-based male contraceptive said an implant or injection could be available within five years.

Another study, published in the Lancet found that men given a hormonal-based contraceptive drug saw their sperm count return to normal just over three months after they stopped using it.
 

SmoochyTX

Lifer
Apr 19, 2003
13,615
0
0
Originally posted by: fleshconsumed
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: fleshconsumed
So who would be dumb enough to take one? :D
Love the double standard. :roll:

Where do you see any double standards? :roll:
OK then, kindly explain what you meant by "So who would be dumb enough to take one?"

I would hate to jump ahead of you on this one. LOL
 

chambersc

Diamond Member
Feb 11, 2005
6,247
0
0
Originally posted by: iamaelephant
I can't even remember to take my vitamins in the morning. No way I would trust myself to take a contraceptive pill daily.

Which is why I'm SHOCKED my gf remembers hers. I'm like you with the vitamins.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,393
8,552
126
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX

OK then, kindly explain what you meant by "So who would be dumb enough to take one?"

I would hate to jump ahead of you on this one. LOL

well, it does say that the chemical is toxic...
Originally posted by: everman
Where would this be implanted exactly? :Q

probably the forearm like female rods
 

fleshconsumed

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2002
6,486
2,363
136
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
OK then, kindly explain what you meant by "So who would be dumb enough to take one?"

I would hate to jump ahead of you on this one. LOL

It means that these pills (just like any other) always have side effects, despite what doctors say. And in the extreme case, who can guarantee that you won't be shooting blanks for the rest of your life? (yes, I've read they say no long term effects, sperm count soon returns to normal yada yada yada, but I'm skeptical to these claims).
 

SmoochyTX

Lifer
Apr 19, 2003
13,615
0
0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX

OK then, kindly explain what you meant by "So who would be dumb enough to take one?"

I would hate to jump ahead of you on this one. LOL

well, it does say that the chemical is toxic...
Adherin on its own is known to have toxic effects on the body, but the team overcame this problem by ensuring it would only attach to one cell in the body - the Sertoli cells.

The team tested it on vital organs such as the kidneys, liver, heart and brain, and found it had no harmful side effects.
 

newParadigm

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2003
3,667
1
0
Originally posted by: Savij
All the sex you can handle and no possibilty of babies? Where is the downside?

TruTru. This sounds very possibly like a good development. It doesn't change anything physically, just gets in the way of the site that the sperm bond to the sertoli cells. Meaning that as soon as one would stop taking it, the substance would soon s'leav' the sertoli cells, and the sperm would be again able to bond.

I'd take it. ;).
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,393
8,552
126
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Adherin on its own is known to have toxic effects on the body, but the team overcame this problem by ensuring it would only attach to one cell in the body - the Sertoli cells.

The team tested it on vital organs such as the kidneys, liver, heart and brain, and found it had no harmful side effects.

on rats with 90 day life spans.
 

SmoochyTX

Lifer
Apr 19, 2003
13,615
0
0
Originally posted by: fleshconsumed
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
OK then, kindly explain what you meant by "So who would be dumb enough to take one?"

I would hate to jump ahead of you on this one. LOL

It means that these pills (just like any other) always have side effects, despite what doctors say. And in the extreme case, who can guarantee that you won't be shooting blanks for the rest of your life? (yes, I've read they say no long term effects, sperm count soon returns to normal yada yada yada, but I'm skeptical to these claims).
Then you'd be in the same boat as your girlfriend/wife. It's time that science moved beyond women having to always take the drugs and guys trying to remember to have a condom around.

If something could be developed that would have the same percentage of risk (all around) as female contraception, would you really be against it?

*Of course, it would not protect against STDs, only pregnancy.*
 

fleshconsumed

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2002
6,486
2,363
136
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
If something could be developed that would have the same percentage of risk (all around) as female contraception, would you really be against it?

If somebody wants to use it, by all means let them. As for me, let's just say I definitely won't be among the "first adopters".

 

DainBramaged

Lifer
Jun 19, 2003
23,454
41
91
I'm all for male birth control. Honestly, the guy has a lot more at stake than the girl. No way that I'm going to "hope" that a girl remembers to take her b/c if there is another alternative. I already take risks, but I'd MUCH rather take my own pill.
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: DainBramaged
I'm all for male birth control. Honestly, the guy has a lot more at stake than the girl. No way that I'm going to "hope" that a girl remembers to take her b/c if there is another alternative. I already take risks, but I'd MUCH rather take my own pill.

Or, as I've seen happen several times, the girl "forgets" to take it, and whammo, preggers. :(

- M4H