New benchmark

[Modelworks]

Very cool to see some of this stuff being done in real time.
Radiosity is especially hard to do in real time and usually requires pre-processing a scene. Even the new unreal engine requires the levels lighting be pre-processed before playing.
This is doing it in real time.

I got 97 fps with a 7900GT pentium D 3ghz.

http://dee.cz/lightsmark/

 

[Dazed and Confused]

About to test my XP-M system fully OC'd 🙂 WIll post the results with my Modified 9800Pro in a bit 🙂

 

[swtethan]

Ill do this tonight

 

[mazeroth]

Downloading now. Thanks.

 

[JPB]

I got an average of 67.5 with rig in sig at 4aa / 16af and 93.2 with no aa/no af.

 

[Therk]

50.3 fps 1280x1024 no aa/af with 6800GS

 

[swtethan]

260.6 fps


stock clocks on my GPU

 

[swtethan]

301.0 with 750/1860/2000 gpu clock

 

[bryanW1995]

how did you enable/disable AA/AF on that benchmark?

56.9 1440x900 full screen

 

[Denithor]

1024x768 76.7
1280x1024 72.7
1600x1200 62.7

All stock:
e6400
x1900gt 256MB rev1
2GB OCZ DDR2-667 4-4-4-15

EDIT:
Looks like I didn't become gpu bound until went above 1280x1024. How much of this benchmark is dependent on cpu versus gpu? When I get my IP35-E next week (ZZF is kinda slow on shipping these days...) I will play around with different processor speeds and see how it scales with more cpu power.

 

[swtethan]

Originally posted by: bryanW1995
how did you enable/disable AA/AF on that benchmark?

56.9 1440x900 full screen

how come im like... 6x the fps

 

[Denithor]

Originally posted by: swtethan

Originally posted by: bryanW1995
how did you enable/disable AA/AF on that benchmark?

56.9 1440x900 full screen

how come im like... 6x the fps

Because you have 2x the processing power and an 8800GT clocked past 8800GTX level compared to his x1950xt...

 

[swtethan]

Originally posted by: Denithor

Originally posted by: swtethan

Originally posted by: bryanW1995
how did you enable/disable AA/AF on that benchmark?

56.9 1440x900 full screen

how come im like... 6x the fps

Because you have 2x the processing power and an 8800GT clocked past 8800GTX level compared to his x1950xt...

i should be only like..... 2-3x

 

[Don66]

206.7fps 1920x1200 full screen

 

[MoMeanMugs]

I agree with swtethan. I have a 1950xt 512 MB and E6400 at stock speeds and got 103.5 FPS.

 

[AzN]

this benchmark is way off. It's not real situation in a game or doesn't even come close. I'd choose 3dmark over this.

 

[MoMeanMugs]

I re-ran @ 1680x1050 and got 91.7 FPS. Something isn't right with bryanW1995's computer.

 

[P229SAS]

131.2 average fps with sig rig

 

[lyssword]

33.6 fps 1280x1024. 1core a64 2.2ghz, x800xl 2x512ddr1

 

[Sentry2]

414fps @ 1920x1080 Ultra @ 756//1867/2374

 

[Modelworks]

Originally posted by: Azn
this benchmark is way off. It's not real situation in a game or doesn't even come close. I'd choose 3dmark over this.

3dmark does not do realtime radiosity and GI which is the point of the benchmark.

Every game engine up to now has required the levels be pre-processed as realtime lighting like the above was extremely slow. Pay attention to the radiosity especially.

If you shine a light on a wall painted red, that light scatters onto nearby objects also coloring them with a reddish light. That kind of lighting is hard on cpu and gpu and I know of no game engines that do it in realtime.

 

[justinburton]

339.2 fps at 1920x1200 Fullscreen

 

[swtethan]

Originally posted by: justinburton
339.2 fps at 1920x1200 Fullscreen

You must run SLI or CF

 

[RussianSensation]

298.7fps at 1280x1024 with Q6600@ 3.4ghz + 8800GTS 513/792 speeds
353.2fps at 1280x1024 with Q6600@ 3.4ghz + 8800GTS 618/900

 

[bryanW1995]

Originally posted by: MoMeanMugs
I agree with swtethan. I have a 1950xt 512 MB and E6400 at stock speeds and got 103.5 FPS.

what resolution?