• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

New Battlefield 2 gameplay video

styrafoam

Platinum Member
175meg torrent 15 minutes long. This games is gonna be a blast! The vehicle models in there look soo good, coming close to flight sim quality. I can't wait to run around in that AA tank, it just tears everything to pieces :Q

more trailers #4 and #5 are new today, and shot from the 1st person view.
 
Originally posted by: yankeesfan
Originally posted by: yankeesfan
is there a FPS part of the game?

When I played bf1942, I always wondered what the point was to have any guns. Everyone was always in a tank or airplane or whathaveyou. The only weapon worth holding was an RPG, and even that was no match for a tank.
 
Originally posted by: malak
Originally posted by: yankeesfan
Originally posted by: yankeesfan
is there a FPS part of the game?

When I played bf1942, I always wondered what the point was to have any guns. Everyone was always in a tank or airplane or whathaveyou. The only weapon worth holding was an RPG, and even that was no match for a tank.

Only the DC mod was like that. I am a die hard BF1942 original fan because the gameplay was fps due to limited vehicles on most of the maps.
 
DC is pretty fun... its just the fact that the planes and SCUD missles dominate a little too much in many of the maps.
 
Originally posted by: malak
Originally posted by: yankeesfan
Originally posted by: yankeesfan
is there a FPS part of the game?

When I played bf1942, I always wondered what the point was to have any guns. Everyone was always in a tank or airplane or whathaveyou. The only weapon worth holding was an RPG, and even that was no match for a tank.

First, the RPG is a match for a tank. One RPG to the back of a Panzer or Sherman will destroy it. Tigers and M10's are tougher, and hitting the front or sides of any tank doesn't do nearly as much damage as hitting it in the back.

Second, I totally disagree. It depends on the map of course, but in most maps, infantry plays a very key role. I think the strength of BF was how they included so many vehicles without diminishing the importance of infantry.
 
Would be better if it wasn't all tank wars. Discourages teamwork and infantry. In Joint Operations there are plenty of vehicles, but it doesnt turn it into vehicle wars.
 
Back
Top