- Oct 28, 2000
- 867
- 0
- 0
My new baby cousin was born about a six weeks premature. He's been under neonatal intensive care for about two weeks, and has been doing great. Once they're sure he can be bottle fed ok, the hospital will release him. That's the good news!
Bad news is the insurance company. My aunt and uncle were told to add him within 30 days after the birth. So, they've done that, but now the insurance company is refusing to pay for the neonatal care because they are saying the premature birth is a pre-existing condition. WTF?
I don't even want to think about how big the bill will be without coverage (which included helicopter transport from a rural hospital to a larger hospital...) I heard all this from my other aunt, so I don't know any more details and it would probably be awkward to ask. The only thing I can think of is that they should have added the "baby" to the plan way before it was born, but that's not what the insurance company told them.
Has anyone heard of this happening or have suggestions of dealing with it?
Locked at OP's request
esquared
Anandtech Senior Moderator
Bad news is the insurance company. My aunt and uncle were told to add him within 30 days after the birth. So, they've done that, but now the insurance company is refusing to pay for the neonatal care because they are saying the premature birth is a pre-existing condition. WTF?
I don't even want to think about how big the bill will be without coverage (which included helicopter transport from a rural hospital to a larger hospital...) I heard all this from my other aunt, so I don't know any more details and it would probably be awkward to ask. The only thing I can think of is that they should have added the "baby" to the plan way before it was born, but that's not what the insurance company told them.
Has anyone heard of this happening or have suggestions of dealing with it?
Locked at OP's request
esquared
Anandtech Senior Moderator