New Auto Surveys out from J.D. Power & Associates

Cfour

Golden Member
Jul 6, 2000
1,486
0
0
www.sternie.com
It's on CNBC right now, but can someone help me find a link? I'm looking for the whole new list.

All they said was that in the new initial quality:

#1 Lexus
#2 Cadillac
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
This is initial quality though, not long term and there can be a difference.

Wow look at KIA!
 

Ryan

Lifer
Oct 31, 2000
27,519
2
81
Originally posted by: Skoorb
This is initial quality though, not long term and there can be a difference. Wow look at KIA!

I agree. Initial quality doesn't realy mean much, long term is what realy matters.
 

BigSmooth

Lifer
Aug 18, 2000
10,484
12
81
The study also reveals that vehicles built by German and Japanese manufacturers in their native markets record higher average initial quality overall than those built in their North American plants. Vehicles produced in Germany by BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen, and those produced in Japan by Honda, Mitsubishi, Nissan and Toyota demonstrated overall higher initial quality than the vehicles built by their North American plants. There are exceptions, such as vehicles produced by Acura, Mazda and Subaru in North American plants, which show higher quality than other vehicles built at their assembly plants in Japan.

Honda Accords built in Japan have a nearly 25 PP100 advantage over those built in North American plants, while Civics built in North America have a nearly 15 PP100 advantage over their Japanese-built counterparts. Toyota Corollas built in both Japan and North America are almost identical in initial quality.
Predictable, but still, d'oh! :confused:
 

BigSmooth

Lifer
Aug 18, 2000
10,484
12
81
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Hummer's have some PISSASS initial build quality.
So do Mini Coopers, apparently. Guess there was a little cost-cutting somewhere to keep it cheap.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: bigsmooth
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Hummer's have some PISSASS initial build quality.
So do Mini Coopers, apparently. Guess there was a little cost-cutting somewhere to keep it cheap.
Damn and I'd thought I'd done enough cost cutting with its weak ass power plant :0

 

RossMAN

Grand Nagus
Feb 24, 2000
78,868
368
136
Originally posted by: rbloedow
Originally posted by: Skoorb
This is initial quality though, not long term and there can be a difference. Wow look at KIA!

I agree. Initial quality doesn't realy mean much, long term is what realy matters.

I also agree.

Great if the car's build quality is perfect after 6 months but the real test is 6-10 years down the road.
 

BigSmooth

Lifer
Aug 18, 2000
10,484
12
81
Long-term reliability is definitely more important, but when you're buying a new car, it's nice to have it work perfectly off the lot and not have to bring it back to the dealership for warranty repairs, no matter how small, in the first few months you own the car.

Obviously, improvement/excellence in initial quality can mean the same thing for long-term reliability. Lexus owns this study every year and they certainly make reliable cars.
 

Mani

Diamond Member
Aug 9, 2001
4,808
1
0
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Originally posted by: rbloedow
Originally posted by: Skoorb
This is initial quality though, not long term and there can be a difference. Wow look at KIA!

I agree. Initial quality doesn't realy mean much, long term is what realy matters.

I also agree.

Great if the car's build quality is perfect after 6 months but the real test is 6-10 years down the road.

Initial quality isn't always a good indicator by itself but there's usually a correlation between it and long-term. I'd be willing to bet the rankings will be very similar for long-term reliability.
 

Vette73

Lifer
Jul 5, 2000
21,503
9
0
The only problem with long term quality is the motor company has sometimes little to do with it.

Most problems I see on cars older than 3 years are mostly because of how someone has taken care of it.

They can control how it does in the first year or so but the majority of stuff that breaks or comes apart mostly id because of the owner.
 

Shantanu

Banned
Feb 6, 2001
2,197
1
0
What kind of car do you think is going to have more problems 10 years down the road? One that has fewer problems right now, or one that has more problems? Somehow, I don't think all the initial quality problems that the Hyundais and Volkswagens out there have magically fix themselves over the years.

Also, if you're just into leasing cars or holding them for 2-3 years then getting a new one, initial quality is much more important than long term reliability (but then again, the two are pretty closely related).

I'm pleased to see General Motors Corp. moving up in the rankings. They're dominating the North American plant and midsize car rankings.
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
Damn, not surprising to see Toyota/Lexus dominating. Toyota as a company (including Lexus) is tops and Lexus' problems per 100 vehicles is an AMAZING 76. GEEZ!! That's unheard of and way ahead of the competition. They also swept the top three plants as well (GS/LS, Prius, Camry/ES).

If that isn't enough, they scored #1 on 6 out of 16 in the individual vehicle categories.

Toyota ownz you bastards! :p
 

Crab cake

Senior member
Oct 14, 1999
671
0
0
Tell me how these factors in Initial Quality Survey affect long term reliabilty: wind noise, cabin noise, tire noise, air conditioning/heating noise, seatbelt, paint scratches and best of all smell.