• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

New 64 Man Battlefield 3 Server come kick some butt!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Chaotic42 said:
So is this game more like BC2 or BF2? The MP has gotten good reviews, but I need people I can trust, preferably people who hated BC2. 😛
Click to expand...

It's a lot closer to BF2 than BC2. It's back to more vehicle focused large scale maps (if that's your poison) but you can also fine smaller scale soldier only servers if you wanted. Seems to be a roll of the DICE whether you'll encounter bugs or not, but I had a ton of problems with BF2, few problems with BC2, and next to none with BF3. Granted my exposure to BF3 is quite small so far but it seems to be a bit more stable. BC2 reeked of unoptimized console port while BF3 seems to be well thought out for the PC crowd.
 
Yeah, BF3 is definitely better than BC2. It still feels like BC2, with the plodding movement, dusty environment, and extreme overuse of bloom and HDR. Still, it's pretty fun. Not nearly as good as BF2, but given that I expected it to be terrible, I guess I'm happy with it. They just need to fire whoever designed the UI.... out of a cannon... into the sun.

And give me an option to remove the HDR and head-bobbing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top