New 3dmark2001 score. Check it out. : 2003 score added

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
F

FFactory0x

Diamond Member
Aug 8, 2001
6,991
0
0
2100+@2.3ghz
512mb pc3200 twinmos
9700nonpro sapphir====>unlocked to pro speeds 325/310
new cat 3.7's

2001 score= 16155
1024x768@32bit

2003 score= 5000
1024x768@32bit

What ya think
 
O

orion7144

Diamond Member
Oct 8, 2002
4,425
0
0
Originally posted by: FFactory0x
2100+@2.3ghz
512mb pc3200 twinmos
9700nonpro sapphir====>unlocked to pro speeds 325/310
new cat 3.7's

2001 score= 16155
1024x768@32bit

2003 score= 5000
1024x768@32bit

What ya think
Click to expand...

did you mean overclocked? If you actually unlocked it how did you do since I will be getting one for my kids machine next week.



 
W

Wedge1

Senior member
Mar 22, 2003
905
0
0
I just ran my very first 3DMark03 ever: 5076

I guess that's not bad. I only did it to see if I would get any artifacting or speckles but it was ok.

Asus P4B266-C 1.7Ghz williamette
512 DDR RAM
R9800np 382/315
40gb WD hdd
 
J

Jgtdragon

Diamond Member
May 15, 2000
3,816
19
81
Originally posted by: ICR5
Radeon 9700 PRO
3D MARK2001 =17197 1024x768 32bit
Click to expand...


3D MARK 2001 SE is more of a system bench than a video bench. Since you running at 3.6GHZ the score tends to be higher. What you get on 3D mark 2003? That is more a video card only test.
 
C

Cesar

Banned
Jan 12, 2003
458
0
0
I got 14771 on my RADEON 9500 PRO overclocked to 380/300 !!!! 3DMARK2001 SE
fill rate: single 1117.1 MTexels/s
multi 2924.3 MTexels/s

I think I can get more if I push the core to 390mhz I'm only using stock cooling on the card thinking of using peltier cooling on it to push the core to 400mhz+

Athlon XP 1700+ @ 2300Mhz 1.75V (200x11.5)
NF7-S V.2
Corsair XMS3200LL @ 400Mhz CL 2-2-3-6 2.6v

 
C

Cesar

Banned
Jan 12, 2003
458
0
0
Originally posted by: Jgtdragon
Originally posted by: ICR5 Radeon 9700 PRO 3D MARK2001 =17197 1024x768 32bit
Click to expand...
3D MARK 2001 SE is more of a system bench than a video bench. Since you running at 3.6GHZ the score tends to be higher. What you get on 3D mark 2003? That is more a video card only test.
Click to expand...

so thats way I only got 14771 on my overclocked Radeon 9500 Pro
 
I

ICR5

Golden Member
Nov 13, 2002
1,837
0
0
Originally posted by: Jgtdragon
Originally posted by: ICR5
Radeon 9700 PRO
3D MARK2001 =17197 1024x768 32bit
Click to expand...


3D MARK 2001 SE is more of a system bench than a video bench. Since you running at 3.6GHZ the score tends to be higher. What you get on 3D mark 2003? That is more a video card only test.
Click to expand...

I'll try 2003 tonight.. actually i need to downloaded, is this the one that is 176mb? freeware?

 
B

bunnyfubbles

Lifer
Sep 3, 2001
12,248
3
0
Originally posted by: orion7144
Originally posted by: FFactory0x
2100+@2.3ghz
512mb pc3200 twinmos
9700nonpro sapphir====>unlocked to pro speeds 325/310
new cat 3.7's

2001 score= 16155
1024x768@32bit

2003 score= 5000
1024x768@32bit

What ya think
Click to expand...

did you mean overclocked? If you actually unlocked it how did you do since I will be getting one for my kids machine next week.
Click to expand...

He might have meant that he flashed the bios to that of a 9700 Pro which would somewhat be considered as "unlocking" it. You are running the hardware faster than it was meant to be, so therefore you are overclocking it, but you aren't using a simple software application to do it, the card will run at Pro speeds no matter what system you plug it into, as long as it can run at those speeds which is usually a safe bet to assume it will.

 
F

FFactory0x

Diamond Member
Aug 8, 2001
6,991
0
0
Actually i wouldnt call is overclocking since my board was the ones that ATI underclocked and locked. Baically to satisfy the non pro market, ATI had a lot of pro's already made. Rather than remake non pros, they underclocked some exisiting pro's and locked the bios at nonpro speeds. In essance originally before they shipped them out my card was made as a pro. Now that its flashed back to its pro speed, i can oc from there. Watch out for the mem though. I was lucky to get the samsung 2.86ns mem which is what the pro's have. After they were able to produce non pros, they stopped underclocking existing pro's and started manufacturing non pro's with slower mem
 
W

Wedge1

Senior member
Mar 22, 2003
905
0
0
Yeah, lucky me. I got one of the "new" ones with Infineon memory, lol

But hey, don't be decieved. The 9800np is a great card regardless the memory brand.
 
I

ICR5

Golden Member
Nov 13, 2002
1,837
0
0
Originally posted by: Jgtdragon
Originally posted by: ICR5
Radeon 9700 PRO
3D MARK2001 =17197 1024x768 32bit
Click to expand...


3D MARK 2001 SE is more of a system bench than a video bench. Since you running at 3.6GHZ the score tends to be higher. What you get on 3D mark 2003? That is more a video card only test.
Click to expand...


Just got done with 3D mark 2003.. results for my 9700 Pro are:

3D mark 2001 SE = 17197

3D mark 2003 = 5986
 
J

Jgtdragon

Diamond Member
May 15, 2000
3,816
19
81
Originally posted by: ICR5
Originally posted by: Jgtdragon
Originally posted by: ICR5
Radeon 9700 PRO
3D MARK2001 =17197 1024x768 32bit
Click to expand...


3D MARK 2001 SE is more of a system bench than a video bench. Since you running at 3.6GHZ the score tends to be higher. What you get on 3D mark 2003? That is more a video card only test.
Click to expand...


Just got done with 3D mark 2003.. results for my 9700 Pro are:

3D mark 2001 SE = 17197

3D mark 2003 = 5986
Click to expand...

Nice, did you overclock your 9700 pro?

 
I

ICR5

Golden Member
Nov 13, 2002
1,837
0
0
Originally posted by: Jgtdragon
Originally posted by: ICR5
Originally posted by: Jgtdragon
Originally posted by: ICR5
Radeon 9700 PRO
3D MARK2001 =17197 1024x768 32bit
Click to expand...


3D MARK 2001 SE is more of a system bench than a video bench. Since you running at 3.6GHZ the score tends to be higher. What you get on 3D mark 2003? That is more a video card only test.
Click to expand...


Just got done with 3D mark 2003.. results for my 9700 Pro are:

3D mark 2001 SE = 17197

3D mark 2003 = 5986
Click to expand...

Nice, did you overclock your 9700 pro?
Click to expand...

370/340 for now until i get better cooling (using ATI oem) , maybe i'll head to Fry's sometime and try out a Zalman ZM80c :p



 
J

Jgtdragon

Diamond Member
May 15, 2000
3,816
19
81
My 9700 pro is at 351/331 now. Haven't tried higher. Your 3d mark 2003 blew mine out of the water.
 
J

Jmman

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 1999
5,302
0
76
Athlon FX 51......Radeon 9800 non pro.......all at stock speeds equals about 19000 3dmarks (2001).......:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom