- Jul 15, 2002
- 774
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Anubis
as i said in the post in OT yesterday
"WOW an even bigger paper weight"
This was in OT yesterday? And I thought it's newsOriginally posted by: Anubis
as i said in the post in OT yesterday
"WOW an even bigger paper weight"
Oh well I've owned several macs and in the end I just can't deal with Apple's redicilous operating system (I am refering to OS X BTW).
Originally posted by: Erasmus-X
Oh well I've owned several macs and in the end I just can't deal with Apple's redicilous operating system (I am refering to OS X BTW).
Hmmmm....what makes you think that OS X is ridiculous? Just curious...
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: Anubis
as i said in the post in OT yesterday
"WOW an even bigger paper weight"
As I've said before.
"The ignorance of x86 users makes me wanna get a Mac"
Sigh....One of these days I'll get to try it.OS X 10.3 is just awesome..
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: Anubis
as i said in the post in OT yesterday
"WOW an even bigger paper weight"
As I've said before.
"The ignorance of x86 users makes me wanna get a Mac"
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: Anubis
as i said in the post in OT yesterday
"WOW an even bigger paper weight"
As I've said before.
"The ignorance of x86 users makes me wanna get a Mac"
Originally posted by: mooojojojo
This was in OT yesterday? And I thought it's newsOriginally posted by: Anubis
as i said in the post in OT yesterday
"WOW an even bigger paper weight". Anyway - you should know computers are not all about the specs. Still wouldn't a 20" LCD weight a bit too much for that arm it's attached to?
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: Anubis
as i said in the post in OT yesterday
"WOW an even bigger paper weight"
As I've said before.
"The ignorance of x86 users makes me wanna get a Mac"
Originally posted by: GonzoDaGr8
Looks sweet, But I would have to question the longevity of that little arm holding the screen up. Could be saggin' like a busted kickstand in a short time.
Sigh....One of these days I'll get to try it.OS X 10.3 is just awesome..
Originally posted by: KeithP
I can't imagine attaching a 20 inch LCD display to a computer that you can't upgrade the video card or CPU. In 2 years, the box will be woefully underpowered but the display would still be useful...that is if you could attach it to another machine.
-KeithP
Originally posted by: Baronz
Originally posted by: KeithP
I can't imagine attaching a 20 inch LCD display to a computer that you can't upgrade the video card or CPU. In 2 years, the box will be woefully underpowered but the display would still be useful...that is if you could attach it to another machine.
-KeithP
Yeah, having a 1680x1050 screen with a geforce FX5200 is just wrong![]()
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: Anubis
as i said in the post in OT yesterday
"WOW an even bigger paper weight"
As I've said before.
"The ignorance of x86 users makes me wanna get a Mac"
im not ignorant i actually have respect for macs just not the damn imacs cause im forced to use them almost every day and they are horribly slow.
and putting a 20in LCD on it is just pointless. at 1.25GHz they arnt powerful enough to do anything that would require a screen that big. And for 2200$ you can build 1 hell of a PC with a 20in LCD, just build a Shuttle mini pc and your set same size as an imac and its upgradeable . now if this thing had a G5 in it i would say it would be sweet but the G4 is a crappy CPU. we have labs full of them and they do everything slow even the 1+GHz ones. hell even browsing the net is slower using safari then it is using IE on a 600 MHz Celeron 1. on the same network
i do use dual G4 tower macs at work and in the lab and they are nice especially with OSX but they serve a purpose. Video editing and hard core math Sims. a imac with a 20in LCD has no purpose