• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Nevermind, repost

"Although sex with animals is not illegal in Washington state, Urquhart said that investigators were looking into whether the farm, located in Enumclaw, 40 miles southeast of Seattle, allowed sex with smaller animals that resulted in animal cruelty, which is a crime."

Good Lord.
 
:laugh:

I'm assuming this is a subtle and clever parody, of the fact that this is one of the most reposted articles of all time, on a day that another uber repost, involving ibooks has appeared.

If not, change your link, and it will be the best parody of all time.
 
Originally posted by: So
:laugh:

I'm assuming this is a subtle and clever parody, of the fact that this is one of the most reposted articles of all time, on a day that another uber repost, involving ibooks has appeared.

If not, change your link, and it will be the best parody of all time.

Considering I am decidedly "anti-parody" it would be funny for me to create a parody thread, however, I'm simpy another victim of the weak ass search function at the top of the page and too lazy to do an advanced search until after the fact.
 
Originally posted by: cyberhap
"Although sex with animals is not illegal in Washington state, Urquhart said that investigators were looking into whether the farm, located in Enumclaw, 40 miles southeast of Seattle, allowed sex with smaller animals that resulted in animal cruelty, which is a crime."

Good Lord.


So basically, the law is that as long as the animal enjoys it, it's okay? 😕
 
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Originally posted by: cyberhap
"Although sex with animals is not illegal in Washington state, Urquhart said that investigators were looking into whether the farm, located in Enumclaw, 40 miles southeast of Seattle, allowed sex with smaller animals that resulted in animal cruelty, which is a crime."

Good Lord.


So basically, the law is that as long as the animal enjoys it, it's okay? 😕

Why would it not be? Because you disapprove? If this is a "crime", who is the "victim"?
 
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
Originally posted by: cyberhap
"Although sex with animals is not illegal in Washington state, Urquhart said that investigators were looking into whether the farm, located in Enumclaw, 40 miles southeast of Seattle, allowed sex with smaller animals that resulted in animal cruelty, which is a crime."

Good Lord.


So basically, the law is that as long as the animal enjoys it, it's okay? 😕

Why would it not be? Because you disapprove? If this is a "crime", who is the "victim"?


What do you mean? I was just getting a better understanding of the law. For all you know I could be banging a llama right now. And I might be.
 
Back
Top