Well I fallen asleep and forgot to post the video of the latest Harry Reid China connection news story.
For all those who didn't understand the article, this may show how they got to it, detailed in this video, I was talking about, the news broke live on-air:
Video: Harry Reid behind Bundy Ranch Takeover ?!?! - AJShow Special
Even if you think it's crazy, worth to watch it, it should be funny at least when they realize something big live on-air, moments like these are rare.
UPDATE:
Video: Information Officer Confronted - Won't answer
Also people, now that the mainstream media is more involved, I just warn you to doublecheck what you're listening to is not their spin, to some guys it's been crazy since beginning, simply because the waters weren't rough, you got real news, doesn't happen many times, but when it does, it's interesting.
Again, see how fox news already wanted to get others to stop filming around ranch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0e506pBUaI
Ummm. What is it with right wingers. First they say current administration is against drilling on federal land and now they say they are forcing a rancher off the govts land because they want to drill for oil?
The reality is(at least these days), the US doesn't issue that many permits to drill for oil on federal land(excluding Alaska and the outter continental shelf). And most of this land is under previous orders. The land in question is clearly being completely, totally, and permanently withdrawn from use.
The armed response was because of the 20 years of non compliance and direct threats against the BLM if they were to enforce any of the THREE VALID COURT ORDERS calling for the removal of all of Bundy's cattle and property from the area. For people bitching about the show of force, what do you expect. The guy and his family have said they had a bunch of weapons and would use any means necessary to stop the BLM from enforcing a VALID COURT ORDER(the 3rd since 1998). If anything the BLM has been more than overly accommodating and have tried to resolve this issue. At a certain point what do you expect them to do? The reality of the situation is, the guy, his family, and his cattle should have been ejected from the land 16 years ago.
Man I'm not saying that in your last reply to me, that's what they(bundy) are saying it and can't know the whole story, but there's no way they are doing this without a good freaking reason.
About this quote above, you wonder about their (blm) actions, well, I heard, that the tactic is that when the BLM takes over land, it then sells it to the oil/gas or whatever companies or leases it, and millions of dollars are exchanged, so it's lucrative, but I don't know the whole detailed process because it's still a fresh story, running around trying to cover everything, and I don't say what I am not certain of. And besides, I don't like to make conclusions too early.
Read more at:
http://www.heavy.com/news/2014/04/cliven-bundy-ranch-standoff-police-videos/
That sounds shady to me.
The environmentalists have railed against ranchers and animal grazing for a long time. Looks like the BLM has been used to run all but him out of the business.
I don't think the BLM should be able to unilaterally decide to tax, or otherwise charge, the ranchers. Seems to me that should be up to Congress.
Also, I can't reconcile the amount he is claimed to own. I'm seeing grazing fees at $1.35 per moth (I think?) per cow (a calf would be included as well).
At 1,000 head, and assuming no calves which is not possible, I'm getting about $16k a year. The $1.1 million works out to about $55k per yr. If the rest is interest and penalties that's damn steep.
At this point I think it can simply be viewed as the govt deciding to run people out-of-business and this one guy decided he isn't to go quietly. If his family has been there ranching on that land for 140 and suddenly the BLM decides to run them out business by suddenly creating a tax/fee that's wrong IMO.
It's not much different that some abusive eminent domain cases, except he's not being compensated for the loss.
Fern
Yes, there have been others who didn't stand up as strong as he did, and you never heard stories about that, it's all connected to the UNESCO stuff about environmentalism, it's the fake excuse tactic, because it's hidden under these terms purposelly to dupe you all into thinking "
how dare this rancher keeps those grazing cattles like that, oh may gawd"
http://youtu.be/lpnFG4mfWo4?t=3m8s
I know it sounds crazy to some guys here but what do you think UN "heritage area" is, they have many of those around the world, do they really care about the cattle, come on.
It's not anything new, there's a whole film about it that's about 15 years old now
http://youtu.be/XcewpiMs1HU?t=31m52s
As for the following posts of yours, I also don't fully know in a way that I could say it myself, there's a trick definitely, they present their case as grazing fee issue, and evironmental issue, and the federal court just goes along with it.
I may also add this, about the terms, it's not a joke, they use these to hide under them:
Yet it's done in the name of equity, economic prosperity, and ecological integrity. Globalism is sold to the unsuspecting public with words like free trade, open borders, and environmental protection, but it's really about redistribution of wealth; your wealth.
It's about erasing national borders and national sovereignty. And it's about top-down control, not necessarily by elected officials, but by special interests called Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), which are only sanctioned by the United Nations
http://www.vlrc.org/articles/11.html
"Sustainability" is a big globalist/UN takeover term also to watch for.
http://youtu.be/XcewpiMs1HU?t=41m38s
EDIT: Well now I found a whole film about it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GykzQWlXJs
http://www.slideshare.net/kynize/understanding-sustainable-development-agenda-21-13572937