Network cards

[Mort]

😱Sorry, second question.
Is there a differance in performance between 10/100 network cards?
No name=$25cdn. 3com=$75cdn. ect.

Thanks,
Mort

 

[Supergax]

for the most part, no. some may disagree.

if you want a name brand nic with something that isn't a cheap realtek type chipset, go for this:

http://direct.mwave.com/mwave/doc/a07052.html

which can be found in this list for $35.00.

 

[Elledan]

More expensive, brand NIC's will use less CPU cycles than the cheaper ones. They usually perform better in a large network.

For small networks with reasonable fast PC's, a cheap NIC with a RealTek chipset is usally sufficient.

 

[JackMDS]

Nice Face off here:


NICs Compared

 

[Supergax]

Wasn't there some debate a while ago though about how accurate the tests given there are because of the testing methods and circumstances on how the nics were tested?

 

[Scarpozzi]

I believe a card to be a card to be a card, but there is some truth to the driver sets and how much overhead they have. I would recommend going with the cheaper cards (Netgear/Kingston) unless you're running a server. Then I'd go with 3Com/Intel. Happy Trails.