NERO or EZCD

[k66p526]

New CDRW burner can with Nero 5 software. I only have experience with EZCD 5.

Which is better? Using Windows 2000 mostly.

Thanks,

kevin

 

[Superself]

I've used both Nero and EZCD Plat. and I like Nero better because it doesn't sink it's claws as deep into my system as EZCD does. I did notice a slower boot time with EZCD too.

EZCD has an easier GUI though.

I run Win2k

 

[staff2001]

Iuse nero, it came with my burner and works good.

 

[sc00p]

I prefer nero.

 

[Bglad]

I agree with superself. Nero uses less resources. It is also much more adjustable and more tolerant of data corruption. However, EZCD is much easier to use.

If you are recording audio, which the computer just sucks at, I have done extensive listening tests comparing different software and found they all sound the same. And yes, I am a professional audio engineer. Different brands of blanks however sound very different.

If you are just burning data, use whatever is easiest for you.