Nepal sends strong message to terrorists....

[Shockwave]

Text

Wow, those Nepalese dont take things sitting down do they..... Still waiting for a Russian response to their problem

 

When will the first seal open?

 

[Fausto]

That's just fscking brilliant. :roll:

 

[Shockwave]

Originally posted by: SampSon
When will the first seal open?

Monday at 4:38 PM. I'm having a BBQ for the event, want to come?

 

[DurocShark]

I knew terrorists weren't the brightest bulbs in the box, but seriously!

"Now that we've pissed off the most powerful nation in the world, what should we do next?"

"Hmm. Let's take more hostages. Specifically, lets take hostages from the nations that OPPOSED the US invasion!"

 

[Maverick]

What kind of response are these Iraqi terrorists going for? Now they're just grabbing anyone and everyone...at least it makes people realize what we're fighting against...just sucks that its at the cost of innocent lives.

 

[Moonbeam]

Revenge is an excellent recommendation for the practice non-violence.

 

[MegaWorks]

Originally posted by: Maverick
What kind of response are these Iraqi terrorists going for? Now they're just grabbing anyone and everyone...at least it makes people realize what we're fighting against...just sucks that its at the cost of innocent lives.

Who said they're Iraqis, and who said they're muslims. Just because they're saying "we are a Muslim group Blah!, Blah!", that doesn't mean they are. This group as no connection with any officials in Iraqi, they're wearing masks so how the hell do we know who they are??? Maybe they're CIA agents, or Mossad agents trying to give a bad image to the real resistant muslim fighters who in my mind would never commit these acts.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: MegaWorks

Originally posted by: Maverick
What kind of response are these Iraqi terrorists going for? Now they're just grabbing anyone and everyone...at least it makes people realize what we're fighting against...just sucks that its at the cost of innocent lives.

Who said they're Iraqis, and who said they're muslims. Just because they're saying "we are a Muslim group Blah!, Blah!", that doesn't mean they are. This group as no connection with any officials in Iraqi, they're wearing masks so how the hell do we know who they are??? Maybe they're CIA agents, or Mossad agents trying to give a bad image to the real resistant muslim fighters who in my mind would never commit these acts.

Suuuuure. I tend to go with the more logical and reasonable choice. I see that you are probably a fan of conspiracy theories.

I can see a similar backlash happening in France should the two French journalists be killed. I will feel sorry for the French Muslims if this happens.

 

[Bulk Beef]

Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Maybe they're CIA agents, or Mossad agents trying to give a bad image to the real resistant muslim fighters who in my mind would never commit these acts.

Got denial?

 

[Todd33]

Nothing discourages Muslims waging defensive jihad more than burning Mosques! Can you say pouring gas on a fire?

 

[MegaWorks]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: MegaWorks

Originally posted by: Maverick
What kind of response are these Iraqi terrorists going for? Now they're just grabbing anyone and everyone...at least it makes people realize what we're fighting against...just sucks that its at the cost of innocent lives.

Who said they're Iraqis, and who said they're muslims. Just because they're saying "we are a Muslim group Blah!, Blah!", that doesn't mean they are. This group as no connection with any officials in Iraqi, they're wearing masks so how the hell do we know who they are??? Maybe they're CIA agents, or Mossad agents trying to give a bad image to the real resistant muslim fighters who in my mind would never commit these acts.

Suuuuure. I tend to go with the more logical and reasonable choice. I see that you are probably a fan of conspiracy theories.

I can see a similar backlash happening in France should the two French journalists be killed. I will feel sorry for the French Muslims if this happens.

I said maybe, I don't have evidence that they're CIA or Mossad agents. But you seem to believe these guys are "MUSLIM FIGHTER", plz tell me there identity you seem sure that they are. And that's this Sh!t that "you would feel sorry for the French Muslims" what they have to pay a price if the terrorist murder the french journalists?

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: MegaWorks

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: MegaWorks

Originally posted by: Maverick
What kind of response are these Iraqi terrorists going for? Now they're just grabbing anyone and everyone...at least it makes people realize what we're fighting against...just sucks that its at the cost of innocent lives.

Who said they're Iraqis, and who said they're muslims. Just because they're saying "we are a Muslim group Blah!, Blah!", that doesn't mean they are. This group as no connection with any officials in Iraqi, they're wearing masks so how the hell do we know who they are??? Maybe they're CIA agents, or Mossad agents trying to give a bad image to the real resistant muslim fighters who in my mind would never commit these acts.

Suuuuure. I tend to go with the more logical and reasonable choice. I see that you are probably a fan of conspiracy theories.

I can see a similar backlash happening in France should the two French journalists be killed. I will feel sorry for the French Muslims if this happens.

I said maybe, I don't have evidence that they're CIA or Mossad agents. But you seem to believe these guys are "MUSLIM FIGHTER", plz tell me there identity you seem sure that they are. And that's this Sh!t that "you would feel sorry for the French Muslims" what they have to pay a price if the terrorist murder the french journalists?

You are obviously very biased and a very defensive and hostile person.

You said maybe, but what are the chances of that being likely? Almost none. Again, I go to the more logical and reasonable route - a route that has been shown to be somewhat accurate in the past. These are probably extremist Muslim 'terrorists' and I'm sure that some sort of analysis of these videos would come to a similar conclusion. You are deluding yourself to think that it could be the CIA or the Mossad.

You may not think of their actions as being Muslims, but they apparently do.

What is with this 'Sh!t' that I would feel sorry for the French Muslims? You aren't a very perceptive person, but I should have guessed such when you seem to imply that there is a significant possibility that the CIA or Mossad is chopping off the heads of these people.

First, stay calm. Then read the original post. Then read the article linked to in the original post. Then look at my statement.

"I can see a similar backlash happening in France should the two French journalists be killed." - This says that I can see a similar event occuring in France should these militants behead or kill these two journalists.

"I will feel sorry for the French Muslims if this happens." - This says that I would feel sorry for the many innocent Muslims that would be blamed in some way or come to harm because of the French backlash. I'm not saying that they have to pay anything for the actions of these Muslim extremists, but many French people will likely take their anger out on their fellow Muslims.

So sit back and take a few moments before you reply again if you choose to.

 

[GoPackGo]

Originally posted by: Todd33
Nothing discourages Muslims waging defensive jihad more than burning Mosques! Can you say pouring gas on a fire?

Perhaps the chickens have come home to roost!

 

[Shockwave]

Originally posted by: Todd33
Nothing discourages Muslims waging defensive jihad more than burning Mosques! Can you say pouring gas on a fire?

Fight fire with fire I say. Alls fair in love and war.

 

[MegaWorks]

You are obviously very biased and a very defensive and hostile person.

You said maybe, but what are the chances of that being likely? Almost none. Again, I go to the more logical and reasonable route - a route that has been shown to be somewhat accurate in the past. These are probably extremist Muslim 'terrorists' and I'm sure that some sort of analysis of these videos would come to a similar conclusion. You are deluding yourself to think that it could be the CIA or the Mossad.

You may not think of their actions as being Muslims, but they apparently do.

What is with this 'Sh!t' that I would feel sorry for the French Muslims? You aren't a very perceptive person, but I should have guessed such when you seem to imply that there is a significant possibility that the CIA or Mossad is chopping off the heads of these people.

First thank you for explaining your "french" comment.

Second I'm not a biased, very defensive and hostile person. I'm not a supporter of Al-Queda or any of these "Lets destroy the West" groups. I don't know how you can judge me by reading two sentences. That explains your fast judgement when it comes to these events.

I'm deluding myself? What the CIA or the Mossad have now a high moral degree when it comes to conflics, they can't hire arabe agents for money? You think it's impossible for them commit these acts?

I answer myself this question: Who's profiting form these acts?

 

[Todd33]

Originally posted by: Shockwave

Originally posted by: Todd33
Nothing discourages Muslims waging defensive jihad more than burning Mosques! Can you say pouring gas on a fire?

Fight fire with fire I say. Alls fair in love and war.

I know it's hard to see the forrest through the trees sometimes..

You don not attack a religion of 1.2 billion people when you are angry at a small group. This only gives the extremist more recruiting and fund raising power. Did we hunt and beat down Saudi-Americans after 911? Did we burn mosques?

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: MegaWorks
First thank you for explaining your "french" comment.

Second I'm not a biased, very defensive and hostile person. I'm not a supporter of Al-Queda or any of these "Lets destroy the West" groups. I don't know how you can judge me by reading two sentences. That explains your fast judgement when it comes to these events.

I'm deluding myself? What the CIA or the Mossad have now a high moral degree when it comes to conflics, they can't hire arabe agents for money? You think it's impossible for them commit these acts?

I answer myself this question: Who's profiting form these acts?

You're welcome for the explanation.

What explains my fast judgement of these events is logic, recent history, and the most reasonable explanation.

Yes, you are deluding yourself when you want to ignore the most logical and reasonable explanation...an explanation that has a clear past history that follows the most logical and reasonable explanation. It's not impossible for the CIA, the Mossad, or space aliens to commit these atrocities. However, as recent history and reasonable logic has shown, it is most likely Muslim extremists. I'm sure that any analysis of these videos would say the same thing. It's possible that the CIA, Mossad, or space aliens have hired these Muslim extremists to behead and kill people, but somehow I doubt it.

I'm going to say that everything bad that the US has ever done is because of Muslim extremists. They have hired parts of the US government out through evil tactics. Why not? Is it beyond the realm of possibility? Do Islamic extremists or any extremists for that matter have a higher moral ground when it comes to conflicts? Of course not. Thank you conspiracy theories! You can now never blame anyone for anything!

Who is profiting from these acts? Probably the Muslim extremists that want all 'foreigners' out of their lands. Certainly not the US government which probably wants stability, less bad publicity, and more work to be done in Iraq.

Or it could be the space aliens that have decided on Iraq as the initial point of their invasion.

So please clarify your response. Who do you think is most likely behind all of these hostage killings?

 

[Sultan]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: MegaWorks
First thank you for explaining your "french" comment.

Second I'm not a biased, very defensive and hostile person. I'm not a supporter of Al-Queda or any of these "Lets destroy the West" groups. I don't know how you can judge me by reading two sentences. That explains your fast judgement when it comes to these events.

I'm deluding myself? What the CIA or the Mossad have now a high moral degree when it comes to conflics, they can't hire arabe agents for money? You think it's impossible for them commit these acts?

I answer myself this question: Who's profiting form these acts?

You're welcome for the explanation.

Yes, you are deluding yourself when you want to ignore the most logical and reasonable explanation...an explanation that has a clear past history that follows the most logical and reasonable explanation. It's not impossible for the CIA, the Mossad, or space aliens to commit these atrocities. However, as recent history and reasonable logic has shown, it is most likely Muslim extremists. I'm sure that any analysis of these videos would say the same thing. It's possible that the CIA, Mossad, or space aliens have hired these Muslim extremists to behead and kill people, but somehow I doubt it.

I'm going to say that everything bad that the US has ever done is because of Muslim extremists. They have hired parts of the US government out through evil tactics. Thank you conspiracy theories!

Who is profiting from these acts? Probably the Muslim extremists that want all 'foreigners' out of their lands. Certainly not the US government which probably wants stability, less bad publicity, and more work to be done in Iraq.

Or it could be the space aliens that have decided on Iraq as the initial point of their invasion.

So please clarify your response. Who do you think is most likely behind all of these hostage killings?

A bunch of people taking hostages, either for ransom, or for a completely weird cause does not grant them the title "Muslim extremists". They are just hostage takers, willing to profit whatever turns them on. On the contrary, why are these "Nepali extremists" and all in Iraq? They are willing to profit from a nation in crisis. I feel sorry for their deaths, but they had no business being there. You put your neck in a guillotine, and you have a pretty good chance of losing your head.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: Sultan
A bunch of people taking hostages, either for ransom, or for a completely weird cause does not grant them the title "Muslim extremists". They are just hostage takers, willing to profit whatever turns them on. On the contrary, why are these "Nepali extremists" and all in Iraq? They are willing to profit from a nation in crisis. I feel sorry for their deaths, but they had no business being there. You put your neck in a guillotine, and you have a pretty good chance of losing your head.

They are "Muslim extremists" because they are extremists, Muslim, and seem to use their religion as one of their agendas. There are extremists of all types. Who is saying that anyone that takes a hostage and beheads them is a "Muslim extremist"? Sorry, but they're not. Extremists do not only lie within one religion, group, or idea.

Going to a foreign country to find work is not something that I would use to call someone an 'extremist', but you may find it OK to call it so. The word extremist can mean many things for many different people. I usually use it in a more derogatory manner. Going to a foreign country to do work is not any type of justification of getting beheaded or shot cruelly to suffer and then finally shot in the head.

They had plenty of business in Iraq. You may disagree for whatever reason, but I see no problem with them being there.

 

[Sultan]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: Sultan
A bunch of people taking hostages, either for ransom, or for a completely weird cause does not grant them the title "Muslim extremists". They are just hostage takers, willing to profit whatever turns them on. On the contrary, why are these "Nepali extremists" and all in Iraq? They are willing to profit from a nation in crisis. I feel sorry for their deaths, but they had no business being there. You put your neck in a guillotine, and you have a pretty good chance of losing your head.

They are "Muslim extremists" because they are extremists, Muslim, and seem to use their religion as one of their agendas. There are extremists of all types. Who is saying that anyone that takes a hostage and beheads them is a "Muslim extremist"? Sorry, but they're not. Extremists do not only lie within one religion, group, or idea.

Going to a foreign country to find work is not something that I would use to call someone an 'extremist', but you may find it OK to call it so. The word extremist can mean many things for many different people. I usually use it in a more derogatory manner. Going to a foreign country to do work is not any type of justification of getting beheaded or shot cruelly to suffer and then finally shot in the head.

They had plenty of business in Iraq. You may disagree for whatever reason, but I see no problem with them being there.

ok, you can go ahead and call them what you please. Hindu/Buddhist extremists from Nepal and Christian (majority) extremists from America have no business in Iraq. Your so-called "Muslim extremists" behead right idiots who go uninvited to a foreign nation - a nation which is not handing out H1 Visas. The Christian extremists just drop the bombs from the sky. Up to your interpretation of what is more cruel. Both lead to death. Only difference is you never get to see the body parts of the Iraqis on TV when the Christian extemists drop their massive bombs.

 

[GoPackGo]

Originally posted by: Sultan

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: MegaWorks
First thank you for explaining your "french" comment.

Second I'm not a biased, very defensive and hostile person. I'm not a supporter of Al-Queda or any of these "Lets destroy the West" groups. I don't know how you can judge me by reading two sentences. That explains your fast judgement when it comes to these events.

I'm deluding myself? What the CIA or the Mossad have now a high moral degree when it comes to conflics, they can't hire arabe agents for money? You think it's impossible for them commit these acts?

I answer myself this question: Who's profiting form these acts?

You're welcome for the explanation.

Yes, you are deluding yourself when you want to ignore the most logical and reasonable explanation...an explanation that has a clear past history that follows the most logical and reasonable explanation. It's not impossible for the CIA, the Mossad, or space aliens to commit these atrocities. However, as recent history and reasonable logic has shown, it is most likely Muslim extremists. I'm sure that any analysis of these videos would say the same thing. It's possible that the CIA, Mossad, or space aliens have hired these Muslim extremists to behead and kill people, but somehow I doubt it.

I'm going to say that everything bad that the US has ever done is because of Muslim extremists. They have hired parts of the US government out through evil tactics. Thank you conspiracy theories!

Who is profiting from these acts? Probably the Muslim extremists that want all 'foreigners' out of their lands. Certainly not the US government which probably wants stability, less bad publicity, and more work to be done in Iraq.

Or it could be the space aliens that have decided on Iraq as the initial point of their invasion.

So please clarify your response. Who do you think is most likely behind all of these hostage killings?

A bunch of people taking hostages, either for ransom, or for a completely weird cause does not grant them the title "Muslim extremists". They are just hostage takers, willing to profit whatever turns them on. On the contrary, why are these "Nepali extremists" and all in Iraq? They are willing to profit from a nation in crisis. I feel sorry for their deaths, but they had no business being there. You put your neck in a guillotine, and you have a pretty good chance of losing your head.

With that attitude...then surely you are for the expulsion of all foreign workers from the US...since they are taking advantage of our good economy and job availability.

Oh...and lets tell all people all over the world...you have no business going anywhere to help anyone else...especially if you are getting paid to try and support your family.

Well hell, lets let the Iraqis do it all themselves and leave...lets leave Kosovo while we are at it...and Germany and Asia and everywhere else...oh and no relief workers from the Red Cross cuz I imagine they are getting paid...oh and anyone that does anything at any level for anyone or anywhere is crisis is a possible profiteer and should just leave...to hell with those in trouble...

It takes money to make the world go round..so the world be damned right?

 

[GoPackGo]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: Sultan
A bunch of people taking hostages, either for ransom, or for a completely weird cause does not grant them the title "Muslim extremists". They are just hostage takers, willing to profit whatever turns them on. On the contrary, why are these "Nepali extremists" and all in Iraq? They are willing to profit from a nation in crisis. I feel sorry for their deaths, but they had no business being there. You put your neck in a guillotine, and you have a pretty good chance of losing your head.

They are "Muslim extremists" because they are extremists, Muslim, and seem to use their religion as one of their agendas. There are extremists of all types. Who is saying that anyone that takes a hostage and beheads them is a "Muslim extremist"? Sorry, but they're not. Extremists do not only lie within one religion, group, or idea.

Going to a foreign country to find work is not something that I would use to call someone an 'extremist', but you may find it OK to call it so. The word extremist can mean many things for many different people. I usually use it in a more derogatory manner. Going to a foreign country to do work is not any type of justification of getting beheaded or shot cruelly to suffer and then finally shot in the head.

They had plenty of business in Iraq. You may disagree for whatever reason, but I see no problem with them being there.

Why don't the muslim regulars take care of these people then...or perhaps they agree with the murders and killings of babies...but they dont have the guts to do it themselves....

 

[CanOWorms]

The Nepalese deserved to die because they were non-Muslim. They had to pay a tax, and that tax is death.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: Sultan
ok, you can go ahead and call them what you please. Hindu/Buddhist extremists from Nepal and Christian (majority) extremists from America have no business in Iraq. Your so-called "Muslim extremists" behead right idiots who go uninvited to a foreign nation - a nation which is not handing out H1 Visas. The Christian extremists just drop the bombs from the sky. Up to your interpretation of what is more cruel. Both lead to death. Only difference is you never get to see the body parts of the Iraqis on TV when the Christian extemists drop their massive bombs.

Why don't they have any business in Iraq?

You can go ahead and say that the US army is made up of 'Christian extremists'. Nobody is stopping you, but somehow I doubt that the entire armed forces is made up of Christians.

I would say the one that is purposefully beheading and killing innocent hostages is more cruel. What is coming out of it? The US bombing campaign was done to try to minimalize civilian death while ousting a cruel and murderous dictator. Obviously you and I have separate opinions.