I'm planning on upgrading my system from an XP64-3200 to either a XP64-4400X2 or a plain old XP64-4000.
My question is, do both sides of a dual core offer the same work performance (4400) equally or is the amout of work split?
An example of what I mean is that in a single threaded program which does not take advantage of the second core, will the processor perform equally to a non-dual core processor of the equal speed.
I do game, CAD and encode " TIVO to Go". My processor is killing me in CAD and the encoding. Would I be better off with a fast single core or just go dual?
I also plan on upgrading my Video from a 6800GT to a 7800 GTX and increase my RAM from 1 GB to 2. Will this help in rendering CAD? (CAD is Alibre)
My question is, do both sides of a dual core offer the same work performance (4400) equally or is the amout of work split?
An example of what I mean is that in a single threaded program which does not take advantage of the second core, will the processor perform equally to a non-dual core processor of the equal speed.
I do game, CAD and encode " TIVO to Go". My processor is killing me in CAD and the encoding. Would I be better off with a fast single core or just go dual?
I also plan on upgrading my Video from a 6800GT to a 7800 GTX and increase my RAM from 1 GB to 2. Will this help in rendering CAD? (CAD is Alibre)