Darkranger, another cool thing about these and other forums is you see what the 'experts' are picking and why. There are so many success stories with the 1.6a's that they can't be ignored. I had the money for a 2.2B, but changed my mind when I saw what people were doing with the 1.6a's, and how a 1.6a @ 2.2 would thrash a 2.2B. Personally (and I've already explained how everyone's reasons are different), I just couldn't see how the AMD's were a better buy unless you were buying a system that you were not going to overclock AND you weren't going to upgrade for a couple years. From what I've seen in these threads and personally, I have no problem recommending Intel right now, but I do with AMD-->right now. 🙂
SaintGearge, I had my 1.6A @ 2.4 in a beat-up 4-year-old case with two fans (one intake/one exhaust), one of which was on it's last leg (barely moved!) and a stock hsf. My idle temp never went over 39c, no matter how hot is was in my room. I've upgraded my case since (only because I wanted a really nice case), and have four fans that came with the case (two intake/two exhaust) and the stock hsf. My temp is 38c. You're doing some good research for an AMD system, which is good cause it needs it. An Intel doesn't. I definitely could get my cpu temp down with an Alpha or whatever, but why? I'm using the money for other goodies 🙂.
So here's another thing to look at: buy an AMD, upgrade all your cooling and a good pair of earplugs, and get your good gaming scores. Or buy Intel for roughly the same price as all that, and get roughly the same scores (I know they might be a little different, but do you REALLY care about that small difference?). Again, I wish you good luck!!!
😉