• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Need help with a simple algebra problem

tboo

Diamond Member
I havent done anything with math in over 14 years & my son asked me to help him with a few of his problems. One really stumped me(im sure its really easy).

Here is the problem: simplify the equation

x+y/x+y-4 - y/y-4

Any help with a walkthough on how you solved it is appreciated

Thanks
 
Originally posted by: tboo
x+y/x+y-4 - y/y-4

Woohoo, easy stuff. Okay, the rule is that you solve multiplication/division first, then add/subtract, from left to right. Treat anything inside parenthesis as separate and solve those initially.

But the way you formatted the equation is really weird. I can't tell how stuff is grouped. Can you try and format that a little better, so it looks exactly like it does on his homework?
 
Originally posted by: gorcorps
Man I really need some parenthesis in there:
is it [(x+y)/(x+y-4)] - [y/y-4]?

i'm assuming so based on how he put a space around the subtraction sign in the middle, but omitted it in the other places.
 
Originally posted by: gorcorps
Man I really need some parenthesis in there:
is it [(x+y)/(x+y-4)] - [y/y-4]?

Thats the thing - if they aren't there to begin with, you can't assume the addition/subtraction is supposed to have them, or it completely changes the answer. :shocked:
 
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: tboo
x+y/x+y-4 - y/y-4

Woohoo, easy stuff. Okay, the rule is that you solve multiplication/division first, then add/subtract, from left to right. Treat anything inside parenthesis as separate and solve those initially.

But the way you formatted the equation is really weird. I can't tell how stuff is grouped. Can you try and format that a little better, so it looks exactly like it does on his homework?

Ok lets see if I can do this on the forum:

x+y
------
x+y-4

minus

y
----
y-4



is that better?

Thanks for your help
 
Well if it's grouped like I said then what slackwarelinux posted is right. How I did it:

You have to start by getting a common denominator of (x+y-4)(y-4), on the left of the minus sign you'll multiply by (y-4)/(y-4) and on the right you'll multiply by (x+y-4)/(x+y-4). Now properly FOIL and carry through all the numerator operations, then cancel out where you can, and you'll end up with:

-4x/(x+y-4)(y-4)
 
Done out long hand...

(x+y)(y-4) - y(x+y-4)
________________

(x+y-4)(y-4)



Goes to (multiply out the brackets)-

xy - 4x + y^2 - 4y -xy -y^2 + 4y
____________________________

(x+y-4)(y-4)



Cancel out terms -

-4x
______________
(x+y-4)(y-4)


Then do the same for the bottom.
 
Originally posted by: tboo
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: tboo
x+y/x+y-4 - y/y-4

Woohoo, easy stuff. Okay, the rule is that you solve multiplication/division first, then add/subtract, from left to right. Treat anything inside parenthesis as separate and solve those initially.

But the way you formatted the equation is really weird. I can't tell how stuff is grouped. Can you try and format that a little better, so it looks exactly like it does on his homework?

Ok lets see if I can do this on the forum:

x+y
------
x+y-4

minus

y
----
y-4



is that better?

Thanks for your help

yeah that's not going to work on Fusetalk 🙁 But I can see what you mean.

(x+y)/(x+y-4) - y/(y-4)

It's still not an equation, but try this.

I probably made a mistake there, I rushed through it.

Also note this isn't an equation, it's an expression.

Edit - ok, yeah I made a hash of that judging by other people's answers. Oops.
 
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer

yeah that's not going to work on Fusetalk 🙁 But I can see what you mean.

(x+y)/(x+y-4) - y/(y-4)

It's still not an equation, but try this.

I probably made a mistake there, I rushed through it.

Also note this isn't an equation, it's an expression.

Edit - ok, yeah I made a hash of that judging by other people's answers. Oops.

Looks good 🙂
 
You need to divide the entire expression by x. Happily this expression has only one term in the numerator and that term is a multiple of x, so just can just get rid of the x, making the numerator -4.

When you're helping your son with this, make sure he knows for sure why he is doing these things. Don't just tell him to drop the x in front of the -4, ask him why that's what he should do. If he doesn't know, go back through this stuff in his text book.
 
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
You need to divide the entire expression by x. Happily this expression has only one term in the numerator and that term is a multiple of x, so just can just get rid of the x, making the numerator -4.

When you're helping your son with this, make sure he knows for sure why he is doing these things. Don't just tell him to drop the x in front of the -4, ask him why that's what he should do. If he doesn't know, go back through this stuff in his text book.

You lost me on the answer to the last part
 
Multiplying by 1/x is identical to dividing by x (they are inverse operations). You can think of the answer to the first part of the problem as being "negative four, multiplied by x, divided by (the denominator)". You can divide that whole thing by x by removing the "multiply by x" part (remember, division is the inverse of multiplication). Or you could think of it as multiplying x by 1/x. If you draw that on paper it should be immediately obvious that this is x/x, which is equal to 1. So that expression from earlier multiplied by 1/x becomes "-4, multiplied by 1, divided by (the denominator)".
 
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Multiplying by 1/x is identical to dividing by x (they are inverse operations). You can think of the answer to the first part of the problem as being "negative four, multiplied by x, divided by (the denominator)". You can divide that whole thing by x by removing the "multiply by x" part (remember, division is the inverse of multiplication). Or you could think of it as multiplying x by 1/x. If you draw that on paper it should be immediately obvious that this is x/x, which is equal to 1. So that expression from earlier multiplied by 1/x becomes "-4, multiplied by 1, divided by (the denominator)".

Doesnt the denominator get multiplied by x as well?
 
Originally posted by: tboo
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Multiplying by 1/x is identical to dividing by x (they are inverse operations). You can think of the answer to the first part of the problem as being "negative four, multiplied by x, divided by (the denominator)". You can divide that whole thing by x by removing the "multiply by x" part (remember, division is the inverse of multiplication). Or you could think of it as multiplying x by 1/x. If you draw that on paper it should be immediately obvious that this is x/x, which is equal to 1. So that expression from earlier multiplied by 1/x becomes "-4, multiplied by 1, divided by (the denominator)".

Doesnt the denominator get multiplied by x as well?

Multiplying the denominator by x is identical to dividing the numerator by x.
 
Back
Top