I don't want to build a new gaming system just yet. I am planning to go for it in about 1-1,5y. Till then, I wouldn't say "No" to some overpriced extra CPU horsepower, as long as I am not totally wasting money, 'cause the games I am playing seem like they could benefit from some extra CPU power. I am using this PC for gaming at 1440p (2560x1600) and I am thinking about a decently priced upgrade for the CPU.
My current system consists of the following:
PSU - Corsair 1200W
Mobo - EVGA X58 Classified 3 (141-GT-E770) - LGA 1366
CPU - i7 950 @ 3.9 Ghz (23 x 167, 23 x 171 is fine too) - conservative o/c on air using a Prolimatech's Megahalems with 2 fans setup.
RAM - Corsair 1600 6 x 2gb = 12gb RAM (clocked at 1338 Mhz)
GPU - 2x GTX 780 Ti SLI
Storage - 2 SSDs, 2 HDDs, games run from EVO 960 on Sata2
Monitor - Dell u3014 (2560x1600)
I only have basic experience with o/c and I believe I could get more out of my 950, but back then when I had bought it, after experimenting with it for some time, I decided that I was happy with a conservative 3.9 ghz o/c that I could reach with stock voltage.
So, according to EVGA, the following CPUs are supported by my mobo: Westmere Xeon x5690, x5680, x5670, x5667, some more.
So, I was wondering:
1) Since I can get a Xeon rather cheap, could I get any meaningful upgrade by o/cing it on air, compared to my o/ced 950?
2) If I decide to go for it, which Xeon would you recommend?
Most of the games I am playing can't really utilize effectively more than 2 cores, definitely not more than 4. So, I am going by the assumption that I would see a real benefit only if I could get a considerably higher stable o/c frequency. Am I wrong to assume that, are there any substantial real life gains to be expected by the newer architecture of the x5690 in gaming? (newer compared to my i7 950).
Finally, I am wondering if the lower TDP of the x5670 and 5667 (95W opposed to 130 for the x5690) would make for a better o/c on air. Additionally, considering that the x5667 has 4 cores and I don't think I need 6 for gaming, maybe between x5667 and x5670, the x5667 would be better for o/c due to having less cores or should I go for the safer choice of the 6 cores? Thoughts?
Thanks in advance for any help.
My current system consists of the following:
PSU - Corsair 1200W
Mobo - EVGA X58 Classified 3 (141-GT-E770) - LGA 1366
CPU - i7 950 @ 3.9 Ghz (23 x 167, 23 x 171 is fine too) - conservative o/c on air using a Prolimatech's Megahalems with 2 fans setup.
RAM - Corsair 1600 6 x 2gb = 12gb RAM (clocked at 1338 Mhz)
GPU - 2x GTX 780 Ti SLI
Storage - 2 SSDs, 2 HDDs, games run from EVO 960 on Sata2
Monitor - Dell u3014 (2560x1600)
I only have basic experience with o/c and I believe I could get more out of my 950, but back then when I had bought it, after experimenting with it for some time, I decided that I was happy with a conservative 3.9 ghz o/c that I could reach with stock voltage.
So, according to EVGA, the following CPUs are supported by my mobo: Westmere Xeon x5690, x5680, x5670, x5667, some more.
So, I was wondering:
1) Since I can get a Xeon rather cheap, could I get any meaningful upgrade by o/cing it on air, compared to my o/ced 950?
2) If I decide to go for it, which Xeon would you recommend?
Most of the games I am playing can't really utilize effectively more than 2 cores, definitely not more than 4. So, I am going by the assumption that I would see a real benefit only if I could get a considerably higher stable o/c frequency. Am I wrong to assume that, are there any substantial real life gains to be expected by the newer architecture of the x5690 in gaming? (newer compared to my i7 950).
Finally, I am wondering if the lower TDP of the x5670 and 5667 (95W opposed to 130 for the x5690) would make for a better o/c on air. Additionally, considering that the x5667 has 4 cores and I don't think I need 6 for gaming, maybe between x5667 and x5670, the x5667 would be better for o/c due to having less cores or should I go for the safer choice of the 6 cores? Thoughts?
Thanks in advance for any help.