Need help buying a new AMD processor...

1200monkey

Senior member
Mar 13, 2000
324
0
0
This will be my second computer that I'm building. I wanted to know the difference between all of the AMD processors (Barton, Thoroughbred, Thunderbird, etc.). Can anyone brief me on this, or link me to an article? Thanks.
 

Shimmishim

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2001
7,504
0
76
okay

thunderbird - 256k's L2 .18 um process
duron aka applebreds - 64k's L2 .13 um process
tbred - 256k's L2 .13 um process
tbred (thortons) - 256k's L2 .13 um process <---- basically a barton with 1/2 the L2 cache disabled
barton - 512k's L2 .13 um process
A64 newcastle - 512k's L2 .13 um process <-- 64-bit enabled processor (backwards compatible with 32-bit)
A64 clawhammer - 1024k's L2 .13 um process <-- 64-bit enabled processor (backwards compatible with 32-bit)

I believe the L1 cache is all 64k's on all these processors but i could be wrong


bartons have a larger die due to the larger cache than the tbreds
HOWEVER, the thortons have the same die size but have 1/2 the cache disabled

anyone can add to this
 

Jeff7181

Lifer
Aug 21, 2002
18,368
11
81
Lets simplify this a bit... if money is a concern, you want a Barton... if you have money to spend, you want an Athlon-64. :D
 

alphonsus

Member
Mar 25, 2003
92
0
0
I just bough a barton off newegg for $86.20 with free shipping.
AMD 2500+ 333Mhz FSB with 512k Cache

I wish I had the money for the 400mhz FSB but I'm not sure how big of a diff that would make since I rarely play games. Retail was only a few bucks more than the OEM so I got it instead for the warranty.


It says from newegg easter sale; so I dont know how much longer the price will stay.
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Originally posted by: Shimmishim
okay

thunderbird - 256k's L2 .18 um process
duron aka applebreds - 64k's L2 .13 um process
tbred - 256k's L2 .13 um process
tbred (thortons) - 256k's L2 .13 um process <---- basically a barton with 1/2 the L2 cache disabled
barton - 512k's L2 .13 um process
A64 newcastle - 512k's L2 .13 um process <-- 64-bit enabled processor (backwards compatible with 32-bit)
A64 clawhammer - 1024k's L2 .13 um process <-- 64-bit enabled processor (backwards compatible with 32-bit)

I believe the L1 cache is all 64k's on all these processors but i could be wrong


bartons have a larger die due to the larger cache than the tbreds
HOWEVER, the thortons have the same die size but have 1/2 the cache disabled

anyone can add to this
Actually, Shim, the L1 cache on all of the processors except the Durons is 128KB. It's just split up into 64KB of L1 Data and 64KB of L1 Code, for whatever reason.
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
No problem, Shim, I would forget all about what kind of cache the XP processors had myself, if I had a 2.6ghz Athlon64!:D
 

bdjohnson

Senior member
Oct 29, 2003
748
0
0
Originally posted by: alphonsus
I just bough a barton off newegg for $86.20 with free shipping.
AMD 2500+ 333Mhz FSB with 512k Cache

I wish I had the money for the 400mhz FSB but I'm not sure how big of a diff that would make since I rarely play games. Retail was only a few bucks more than the OEM so I got it instead for the warranty.


It says from newegg easter sale; so I dont know how much longer the price will stay.

If you bump the FSB up to 400 like i did on mine it performs like a 3200+. I was able to do this with no voltage gain.
 

Hyperfocal

Senior member
Oct 8, 2003
801
0
0
Actually, Shim, the L1 cache on all of the processors except the Durons is 128KB. It's just split up into 64KB of L1 Data and 64KB of L1 Code, for whatever reason.

Durons have the full L1 cache. They only have 64k of L2 cache.
 

Corsairpro

Platinum Member
Feb 12, 2001
2,543
0
0
Originally posted by: Hyperfocal
Actually, Shim, the L1 cache on all of the processors except the Durons is 128KB. It's just split up into 64KB of L1 Data and 64KB of L1 Code, for whatever reason.

Durons have the full L1 cache. They only have 64k of L2 cache.

Hyperfocal is correct.
 

Fricardo

Senior member
Apr 4, 2004
251
0
0
Originally posted by: bdjohnson
Originally posted by: alphonsus
I just bough a barton off newegg for $86.20 with free shipping.
AMD 2500+ 333Mhz FSB with 512k Cache

I wish I had the money for the 400mhz FSB but I'm not sure how big of a diff that would make since I rarely play games. Retail was only a few bucks more than the OEM so I got it instead for the warranty.


It says from newegg easter sale; so I dont know how much longer the price will stay.

If you bump the FSB up to 400 like i did on mine it performs like a 3200+. I was able to do this with no voltage gain.

Exactly. You can get a 400 fsb AMD processor right now for 78.00 right now at New Egg. Buy an XP-M 2400+ if you want performance on a budget. It should easily OC to 400 fsb and beyond.