- Mar 24, 2003
- 1,133
- 0
- 76
Unless he needs/wants HDMI.Originally posted by: montypythizzle
I have seen many people thinking about it. For 110 you can't lose.
Originally posted by: iRONic
Unless he needs/wants HDMI.Originally posted by: montypythizzle
I have seen many people thinking about it. For 110 you can't lose.
If he's hooking up a newer 42" HDTV it would be an issue. Not so if he's using a 27" CRT.Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
Originally posted by: iRONic
Unless he needs/wants HDMI.Originally posted by: montypythizzle
I have seen many people thinking about it. For 110 you can't lose.
Honestly I don't understand why people make such a big deal about budget receivers not having HDMI. Of course it doesn't have HDMI, it's $110
Even if it did have HDMI, it would probably only have 2 inputs and all it would be doing was video switching.
Originally posted by: iRONic
If he's hooking up a newer 42" HDTV it would be an issue. Not so if he's using a 27" CRT.Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
Originally posted by: iRONic
Unless he needs/wants HDMI.Originally posted by: montypythizzle
I have seen many people thinking about it. For 110 you can't lose.
Honestly I don't understand why people make such a big deal about budget receivers not having HDMI. Of course it doesn't have HDMI, it's $110
Even if it did have HDMI, it would probably only have 2 inputs and all it would be doing was video switching.
Your points are quite valid though. My point is we don't have enough info about his components.
Originally posted by: iRONic
If he's hooking up a newer 42" HDTV it would be an issue. Not so if he's using a 27" CRT.Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
Originally posted by: iRONic
Unless he needs/wants HDMI.Originally posted by: montypythizzle
I have seen many people thinking about it. For 110 you can't lose.
Honestly I don't understand why people make such a big deal about budget receivers not having HDMI. Of course it doesn't have HDMI, it's $110
Even if it did have HDMI, it would probably only have 2 inputs and all it would be doing was video switching.
Your points are quite valid though. My point is we don't have enough info about his components.
Originally posted by: iRONic
If he's hooking up a newer 42" HDTV it would be an issue. Not so if he's using a 27" CRT.Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
Originally posted by: iRONic
Unless he needs/wants HDMI.Originally posted by: montypythizzle
I have seen many people thinking about it. For 110 you can't lose.
Honestly I don't understand why people make such a big deal about budget receivers not having HDMI. Of course it doesn't have HDMI, it's $110
Even if it did have HDMI, it would probably only have 2 inputs and all it would be doing was video switching.
Your points are quite valid though. My point is we don't have enough info about his components.
Originally posted by: Lothar1974
Thanks for the input everyone. I have a Samsung - 32" 720p Flat-Panel LCD HDTV. I have a Poineer 5 Disc DVD player. No receiver, this would be a new setup , not worried about HDMI. I just want to be able to have a little souround sound for movies and play some CD's via the DVD player.
Originally posted by: AMDBOY
Lothar1974, I think your going to like your new surround system. It makes watching a lot more fun. I bought one of these receivers after a little hesitation at first. I noticed they were almost out of stock at my two closest stores. I figured I'd be a fool not to for $110. The wife on the other hand is extremely conscious about all the cables (all of the time). No HDMI on this one. I asked BB if I bought this Sony STRDG510 before BF could I pricematch during the sale. Mgr. laughed and politely declined and said that BF was kind of sacred. One of the competitors said they would though.We'll see.
