Actually coming from someone like me who runs CAD apps I can say the HT is really nice IN AutoCad 2004 as well as ADT2004 where multi-threaded is an option in rendering. On my system with multi-threaded checked I completed a rendering of a walk through 22% faster. Hopefully by this weekend I can tell you how comparable that is to a A64 sckt 939 (dual channel) at 2.4 to 2.6ghz. Generally this is in an area where Intel leads still. If you can get a 2.8c and a good board I bet you can get this up to 3.2-3.5ghz for added punch. Then save the money towards a good vid card.
I have a 5800u soft modded to a quadro fx2500 levels. It would crunch that system you have at work and it cost me 180 bucks for the card. How do I know cause my spec score 7.1 and 8.0 are some of the highest listed over at guru3d.com and are highr then listed at specs own page for FX3000 systems....
Spec 8 results
can't find the link anymore on the spec website for 7.1.1 but only FX4000 machines beat the one I have
Spec 8.0 ran at 3.4ghz default vcore:
Run All Summary
---------- SUM_RESULTS\3DSMAX\SUMMARY.TXT
3dsmax-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 21.19
---------- SUM_RESULTS\CATIA\SUMMARY.TXT
catia-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 17.15
---------- SUM_RESULTS\ENSIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
ensight-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 9.553
---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
light-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 7.543
---------- SUM_RESULTS\MAYA\SUMMARY.TXT
maya-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 29.06
---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROE\SUMMARY.TXT
proe-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 28.05
---------- SUM_RESULTS\SW\SUMMARY.TXT
sw-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 12.20
---------- SUM_RESULTS\UGS\SUMMARY.TXT
ugs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 20.20
Check this vesus your work FX1300 card at a fraction of the cost.
here is my spec 7.1 scores at 3.5ghz
Run All Summary
---------- SUM_RESULTS\3DSMAX\SUMMARY.TXT
3dsmax-02 Weighted Geometric Mean = 31.12
---------- SUM_RESULTS\DRV\SUMMARY.TXT
drv-09 Weighted Geometric Mean = 176.1
---------- SUM_RESULTS\DX\SUMMARY.TXT
dx-08 Weighted Geometric Mean = 158.3
---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
light-06 Weighted Geometric Mean = 36.27
---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROE\SUMMARY.TXT
proe-02 Weighted Geometric Mean = 48.78
---------- SUM_RESULTS\UGS\SUMMARY.TXT
ugs-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 52.04
Here they are agin with 5800U drivers and no quadrofx mod
Run All Summary
---------- SUM_RESULTS\3DSMAX\SUMMARY.TXT
3dsmax-02 Weighted Geometric Mean = 17.06
---------- SUM_RESULTS\DRV\SUMMARY.TXT
drv-09 Weighted Geometric Mean = 69.06
---------- SUM_RESULTS\DX\SUMMARY.TXT
dx-08 Weighted Geometric Mean = 50.42
---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
light-06 Weighted Geometric Mean = 14.55
---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROE\SUMMARY.TXT
proe-02 Weighted Geometric Mean = 18.47
---------- SUM_RESULTS\UGS\SUMMARY.TXT
ugs-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 9.967
It may be a screamin cheap option. Only problem is you would sacrifice 3d options as the last driver set able to be quadro hacked is the 45.32 drivers. I have no issues playing games but it still worth mentioning.
Through in 1gb of 3200..use 5:4 ration and run at 250fsb a 200for memory x2 for 400ddr....