- Jan 29, 2005
- 5,202
- 216
- 106
I'm planning on buying a GTX270 either next month or in January '09, but so far the only thing I've read that is official in terms of what's different between that refresh and the current GTX260 is that it'll be 55nm, that it will consume about 50% less power and will over-clock like mad.
Now, the thing is I don't care much about over-clocking GPU's (I do it but I could certainly live without it, I prefer OC'ing the Memory and CPU instead), and the power consumption is alright as it is currently especially if no OC'ing is implied. And I wouldn't want to spend maybe $60 or $70 extra just because of the refresh when compared to the current GTX260 just because it consumes less power.
So is there anything else in terms of hardware changes that justifies upgrading to a GTX270 instead of a GTX260? And what about the price? If the GTX260's price goes down due to the 270's release by say... even just 10%, but more likely to be something along the lines of 20%, then that's one more reason not to buy a 270 and instead get a 260.
Now, the thing is I don't care much about over-clocking GPU's (I do it but I could certainly live without it, I prefer OC'ing the Memory and CPU instead), and the power consumption is alright as it is currently especially if no OC'ing is implied. And I wouldn't want to spend maybe $60 or $70 extra just because of the refresh when compared to the current GTX260 just because it consumes less power.
So is there anything else in terms of hardware changes that justifies upgrading to a GTX270 instead of a GTX260? And what about the price? If the GTX260's price goes down due to the 270's release by say... even just 10%, but more likely to be something along the lines of 20%, then that's one more reason not to buy a 270 and instead get a 260.