Originally posted by: Insane3D
Actually, if the system is overclocked with good components, and done correctly, it can be just as stable as a non-overclocked machine. If you are going to overclock, a good choice would be the ultra cheap $50 Athlon XP 1600+. If you have decent PC2700 DDR, you can simply make it run on a 166mhz (333mhzDDR) Front Side Bus speed intead of the normal 133mhz (266mhzDDR) FSB speed. This makes the CPU run faster, 1.74ghz vs. 1.4ghz....somewhere between a 2100+ and a 2200+. This way all you are overclocking is the CPU, and everything else in your system will be running normally. Overclocking can be quite confusing if you are new to it, but I or other people on here will be glad to help you out.
My near future gaming system:
EP-8K5A2+
512MB 333Mhz DDR SDRAM PC 2700
128MB TI4200 (MSI or Gainward)
Athlon XP 1600+ w/AX-7 & Orix fan, overclocked
OR 2100+ w/AX-7 & Papst fan, non-overclocked
Antec performance plus 1080 server case w/USB on front (is there an equivalent Chieftec?)
I?ve learned a lot from this thread, and I think I?m just about ready to purchase my new system. I really like the idea of overclocking the memory and the FSB up to 333. Thanks for pointing that out, Insane 3D. I have a CPU question. A few posts ago, Insane 3D mentioned that a 1600+ could be overclocked to the performance of a 2100+ or 2200+. That sounds good (and inexpensive!). However, I was planning (and had budgeted for) a 2100+ T-bred all along. My question is, as a first time OCer (if I could afford it) should I just get the 2100+? Because I?m concerned about stretching my system too far as a first-timer. Also, Insane3D, may I e-mail you privately when I get all this in check out your mobo BIOS settings vs. mine?