Nearly Half of PCs Will Utilize Multi-GPU Tech in 2012 ? JPR

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Janooo

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2005
1,067
13
81
Your first post:

Did Xbitlabs misunderstood and JPR meant multi-core GPU technology instead of multi-GPU technology...

and now:

Originally posted by: MODEL3
...
I didn't implied they meant multi-core GPUs ...

How you can say that with a straight face?

Edit: Somebody explained to me that your statement could be understood as: "Did Xbitlabs misunderstood and they thought that JPR meant multi-core GPU...".
Even though English is a second language to me it's no excuse. I would like to apologize for all the headaches.
 

MODEL3

Senior member
Jul 22, 2009
528
0
0
Originally posted by: Janooo
Your first post:

Did Xbitlabs misunderstood and JPR meant multi-core GPU technology instead of multi-GPU technology...

and now:

Originally posted by: MODEL3
...
I didn't implied they meant multi-core GPUs ...

How you can say that with a straight face?


O.K. this is my last reply!

This part you cut was on my first post,

did you miss my posts after that, where I clarified what I meant?

Originally posted by: MODEL3
I disagree with him regarding the LucidLogix Technologies chip solution mainly because I think NV & ATI have the technological capability to make "SGXMP16 multi core type" GPUs so they will not need the Lucid tech for scaling,
and I think the internal cost for that is way lower than ATI & NV to pay Lucid from now (every freakin year for every chip) money.

It is clear enough from this reply & from your previous replies that you don't even know what JPR report is.

So in my point of view, JPR should have said multi core technologies (like the one is implemented in a model like the SGXMP16) instead of multi AIB systems (JPR meant multi GPU solutions with Lucid tech. solution)

Why you keep going since I disproved your points so many times?


 

MODEL3

Senior member
Jul 22, 2009
528
0
0
Originally posted by: Janooo
^^
Please, see my edit in the above post.

Look my friend, the main reason I didn't find right, to say something to tease you about this (like: with they, you meant John Peddie?)

is because I thought that maybe English is not your first language (I am from Greece so also for me English is not my first language)

So I think it is not right someone to do that (and also anybody can make a mistake, there are no exceptions from that rule)

Can we leave behind us all the previous replys and focus on newer topics? (Some guys here (like IDC) create very good topics and I didn't have the chance yet to post in some of them)

You should check them!