Rant NC GOP just stole a supermajority??

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Nov 29, 2006
15,880
4,435
136
Well I guess that's the idea behind recall elections, although I categorically oppose recalls.

The whole purpose of term lengths is supposed to be that people are free to make unpopular decisions. I don't like this decision but it's absolutely hers to make.

Maybe the Dems should plant a bunch of "conservatives" into government positions. As soon as they are elected they switch to Dems. Dems ram everything and anything thru. Nothing to stop them?
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,343
4,973
136
Yeah fucking right. The Republican party has shown to be such a bastion for freethinkers, and never bullies those who disagree with them.

Take it up with her. Those were her words.

I think she is correct however.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
"Bullying" is just the latest Republican buzzword for their desire to silence any speech that dares disagree with them. Just a few years ago, they were claiming that dissenting speech somehow violated their right to free speech (which of course it doesn't). Now (with their own attacks on the 1a escalating) they calling it "bullying" when someone disagrees with them.

Someone needs to be checking her bank accounts, cause there's no doubt a payoff was made.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,733
6,758
126
Maybe someday voters will decide to seek within their community people engaged in efforts to better those communities and ask them to run and never vote for anybody seeking political office.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,633
15,820
146
I’ll say this. Both of the following can true.

The person is elected, not the party, and they can vote or caucus how they see fit.

Her “explanation” are vapid rightwing talking points straight from a Fox News comments section. Couple that with her sudden flip and previous documented liberal policy support and the whole thing stinks to high heaven.

It’s likely there’s a publicly unknown inciting incident that caused her sudden flip. That incident would almost likely NOT prevent her from caucusing or voting how she wants.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,733
6,758
126
"Bullying" is just the latest Republican buzzword for their desire to silence any speech that dares disagree with them. Just a few years ago, they were claiming that dissenting speech somehow violated their right to free speech (which of course it doesn't). Now (with their own attacks on the 1a escalating) they calling it "bullying" when someone disagrees with them.

Someone needs to be checking her bank accounts, cause there's no doubt a payoff was made.
Maybe blackmail or threats to loved ones that are credible?
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,566
10,243
136
As expected, the legislature wasted no time ramming through abortion restrictions now that they can override the expected governor veto.

Rep. Tricia Cotham’s transformation into a right wing troll is complete—apparently she no longer believes the things she believed all of 2 months ago. “Abortion for me, and not for thee!”
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,255
136
As expected, the legislature wasted no time ramming through abortion restrictions now that they can override the expected governor veto.

Rep. Tricia Cotham’s transformation into a right wing troll is complete—apparently she no longer believes the things she believed all of 2 months ago. “Abortion for me, and not for thee!”
Yeah, either she had recent trauma or was paid off.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,293
32,793
136
This woman betrayed her voters. She said she would caucus as pro choice.

Press need to deep dive as to why the flip flop.

What do you think would happen if the people of the entire state decided to keep the tenets of Roe?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Regardless of partisanship or issues, it seems pretty silly for a member of Congress to unfairly attack the majority of their constituents as "radicals," etc.
Unless of course she's planning on that supermajority to make it so the legislature gets to decide on its membership on its own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
Makes it bad for the people who voted for her when she promised to push Democratic priorities. Those people should be pissed.

Get use to it.
This appears to be a big part of the new "how low can we go" republican strategy. This, and their many other bags of tricky Dick tricks.
But you know... there was a time when democrats held supermajorities in nearly all segments of government. A time when a majority of the judges were democrats. And when the US Supreme Court justices held a liberal majority of democrats, SO WHY did not democrats do back then exactly what republicans are doing now???

Democrats "could have" rigged the system in their favor, set the stage to maintain democrat rule for eternity. But they didn't, and they never do. Democrats never try pulling the dirty tricks that republicans pull with knee-jerk reaction, when and if given the chance. And now, in case we haven't noticed, republicans have gotten that chance. Do notice that republicans are not allowing anything stand in their way. Nothing. From national to local, from mayors to school boards, nothing is standing in their way.
Yeah, I'd just get use to it.
And I suspect we haven't seen anything yet.
Just wait till Biden wins in 0224, but doesn't. And democrats win state after state, but don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,505
16,996
136
This woman betrayed her voters. She said she would caucus as pro choice.

Press need to deep dive as to why the flip flop.

What do you think would happen if the people of the entire state decided to keep the tenets of Roe?

Yeah, something is definitely fishy. Let’s assume a worse case scenario, either they were bought out or this was the plan all along, what’s the fix and how do you prevent this?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,255
136
Yeah, something is definitely fishy. Let’s assume a worse case scenario, either they were bought out this was the plan all along, what’s the fix and how do you prevent this?
If it was fixed from the beginning I think all you can do is end gerrymandering and go to rank choice voting and/or jungle primaries. Not that those would completely fix the problem, but it would make it less likely that someone wins with little really scrutiny. If she was bought out, then she should be charged with taking bribes.

Really proportional representation would be the best fix.
 

thilanliyan

Lifer
Jun 21, 2005
12,057
2,272
126
The more I read into this it doesn’t seem like a Trojan Horse—she and her mom were solid blue and known quantities. I’m genuinely concerned if there was someone making threats to her children—but if so she needs to get the authorities involved.
If anything it was GOP voters making threats against her to switch lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,293
32,793
136
It was what most of us expected. GOP plot to trick voters. As stated in the latest Trump indictment, lying isn't illegal.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,159
15,578
136
It was what most of us expected. GOP plot to trick voters. As stated in the latest Trump indictment, lying isn't illegal.
If it wasnt within the same borders it’d be treason.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,028
12,266
136
It was what most of us expected. GOP plot to trick voters. As stated in the latest Trump indictment, lying isn't illegal.
Duh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,343
4,973
136
If lying was illegal the prison system would be full of politicians of both parties.
 
Nov 29, 2006
15,880
4,435
136
It was what most of us expected. GOP plot to trick voters. As stated in the latest Trump indictment, lying isn't illegal.
Everyone involved should be firing squaded.