NBA: Spurs vs Mavericks -Western Conference Finals

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

LeeTJ

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2003
4,899
0
0
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
Oh, and something else...Dirk Nowitski has now lost all of my respect. I never really liked him because he's such a pansy and flails his arms around a stuff, but driving the side where an injured player is and stepping on his foot? That's just dirty

HEY, before you go off on nowitzki, why not let the spurs have it for NOT calling the TIME OUT when they had the ball.

also, Spurs never made ANY attempt to foul BEFORE he could drive the basket.

Burden is on Spurs for NOT looking out for their own player. I guarantee you that would NEVER have happened with the Nets.

Yes, they could have called a timeout, but the truth of the matter is that Dirk did a classless thing but going right at an injured player.

I can tell you that if it had been most teams it NEVER would have come to that. what did you think dallas was going to do?? just wait around? Nah, say what you want about Nowitzki no way you can say what he did is worse than what the spurs did.
 

Stojakapimp

Platinum Member
Jun 28, 2002
2,184
0
0
Originally posted by: 1YellowPeril
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
Oh, and something else...Dirk Nowitski has now lost all of my respect. I never really liked him because he's such a pansy and flails his arms around a stuff, but driving the side where an injured player is and stepping on his foot? That's just dirty
That's right. And remember--Nowitzki caused Webber's injury too! He used his telekinetic powers to trip Webberpimp.

You should also direct your frustrations at the Rose's teammates and coaches: They would rather save a timeout than go to the aid of a fallen comrade. Tsk tsk.

I have NEVER blamed nowitski for injuring Webber.

And I already agreed that the Spurs COULD HAVE called a timeout...but that's beyond the point. How can you not agree that it's classless to drive right at an injured player...only to then step on his foot. For all Dirk might have known, Rose could have sprained that ankle.
 

sohdahere

Senior member
Dec 30, 2002
626
0
0
Cant believe they won..
the power of the free throw line! 49 out of 50!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
wow and they played defense in the 4th!

I would love to see NETS vs MAVS in the finals!
 

Boogak

Diamond Member
Feb 2, 2000
3,302
0
0
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
Oh, and something else...Dirk Nowitski has now lost all of my respect. I never really liked him because he's such a pansy and flails his arms around a stuff, but driving the side where an injured player is and stepping on his foot? That's just dirty

HEY, before you go off on nowitzki, why not let the spurs have it for NOT calling the TIME OUT when they had the ball.

also, Spurs never made ANY attempt to foul BEFORE he could drive the basket.

Burden is on Spurs for NOT looking out for their own player. I guarantee you that would NEVER have happened with the Nets.

Agreed. What were the Mavs supposed to do? Just stand around and let the shot clock run out until the Spurs decided to move the guy??? If anything, I thought there should have been a 3 second defensive violation, he was clearly in the paint for over 3 seconds. And he didn't step on the guy's foot on purpose, geez.
 

sohdahere

Senior member
Dec 30, 2002
626
0
0
Originally posted by: sohdahere
Originally posted by: Angrymarshmello
I'm guessing Mavs in 6 games.

your're guessing spurs in 6 games...

I take that back..
had no idea theyd be able to pull it off tonight the way they were shooting..
 

LeeTJ

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2003
4,899
0
0
Originally posted by: 1YellowPeril
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
Oh, and something else...Dirk Nowitski has now lost all of my respect. I never really liked him because he's such a pansy and flails his arms around a stuff, but driving the side where an injured player is and stepping on his foot? That's just dirty
That's right. And remember--Nowitzki caused Webber's injury too! He used his telekinetic powers to trip Webberpimp.

You should also direct your frustrations at the Rose's teammates and coaches: They would rather save a timeout than go to the aid of a fallen comrade. Tsk tsk.

Also, that was a FLOP on the part of Rose. he wouldn't have gotten hurt if he hadn't flopped.

also, he it Najara's knee, if the angle had been slightly different it would be najara out for a long time with a dislocated knee.

flops shouldn't be allowed.
 

Banana

Diamond Member
Jun 3, 2001
3,132
23
81
Originally posted by: BoogakBTW, do any other Mav fans here cringe whenever Bradley goes into a shooting motion? And for that matter La Frentz. I swear, our point guards rebound better than those two stiffs. That's a total of almost $100 million of suckiness. Naw... I'm not bitter :disgust:
Bradley is odd. He looks like he moves in slow motion. I know he is very "long," but that can't be all of it.

BTW, no, I don't mind Bradley taking a jumper. He doesn't have much of an inside game :(
 

LeeTJ

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2003
4,899
0
0
Originally posted by: Boogak
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
Oh, and something else...Dirk Nowitski has now lost all of my respect. I never really liked him because he's such a pansy and flails his arms around a stuff, but driving the side where an injured player is and stepping on his foot? That's just dirty

HEY, before you go off on nowitzki, why not let the spurs have it for NOT calling the TIME OUT when they had the ball.

also, Spurs never made ANY attempt to foul BEFORE he could drive the basket.

Burden is on Spurs for NOT looking out for their own player. I guarantee you that would NEVER have happened with the Nets.

Agreed. What were the Mavs supposed to do? Just stand around and let the shot clock run out until the Spurs decided to move the guy??? If anything, I thought there should have been a 3 second defensive violation, he was clearly in the paint for over 3 seconds. And he didn't step on the guy's foot on purpose, geez.

Actually that's an interesting point. the officials could have bailed everyone out by calling a 3 second call on rose. and yes he was there for more than 3 seconds. :)
 

Stojakapimp

Platinum Member
Jun 28, 2002
2,184
0
0
I think you're all missing the point here. It doesn't matter if he flopped and then got hurt. It doesn't matter if Najera almost got hurt. It doesn't matter that they didn't call a timeout or foul Nowitski. All those things aside, and NBA player SHOULD NOT DRIVE AT AN INJURED MAN AND THEN STEP ON HIM! Please tell me how that is classy
 

LeeTJ

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2003
4,899
0
0
Also, for you Spurs Fans, I SERIOUSLY doubt they'll have this good a shooting night again.

also, look at all the games, the SPURS are clearly a first half team. if you can stay close in the first half, you have a good chance of beating them.
 

LeeTJ

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2003
4,899
0
0
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
I think you're all missing the point here. It doesn't matter if he flopped and then got hurt. It doesn't matter if Najera almost got hurt. It doesn't matter that they didn't call a timeout or foul Nowitski. All those things aside, and NBA player SHOULD NOT DRIVE AT AN INJURED MAN AND THEN STEP ON HIM! Please tell me how that is classy

BECAUSE, it was the QUICKEST way to get a stop clock. the Spurs made NO EFFORT TO STOP THE CLOCK.
 

LeeTJ

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2003
4,899
0
0
What do you want them to do, use one of their timeouts?? why should they?? Should they take a bad outside shot??

NO, dirk FORCED them to foul them at the basket.
 

Stojakapimp

Platinum Member
Jun 28, 2002
2,184
0
0
You know LeeTJ, on a side note, I think it's kinda funny who we're rooting for. Me, a King's fan, is now going for the team who beat the Lakers. You, a Laker's fan, is now going for the team who beat the Kings.
 

LeeTJ

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2003
4,899
0
0
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
You know LeeTJ, on a side note, I think it's kinda funny who we're rooting for. Me, a King's fan, is now going for the team who beat the Lakers. You, a Laker's fan, is now going for the team who beat the Kings.

:)

actually, i'm a NETS fan. :)

i only root for the lakers when the nets aren't playing. also, no one really likes to talk eastern conference ball.

Nets ALL THE WAY baby.
 

TheShiz

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
3,846
0
0
does nick van exel always shoot free throws like 3 or 4 feet behind the line like he did today?
 

Stojakapimp

Platinum Member
Jun 28, 2002
2,184
0
0
Maybe the Mav's could have actually ran an offensive set. Instead, Dirk just does the probably the most dangerous play. I just don't see how you guys not think that it was classless. Yes, there were other options, but that doesn't negate the fact that Dirk drove right at the man. I mean, it was blatant
 

Boogak

Diamond Member
Feb 2, 2000
3,302
0
0
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
I think you're all missing the point here. It doesn't matter if he flopped and then got hurt. It doesn't matter if Najera almost got hurt. It doesn't matter that they didn't call a timeout or foul Nowitski. All those things aside, and NBA player SHOULD NOT DRIVE AT AN INJURED MAN AND THEN STEP ON HIM! Please tell me how that is classy

The guy was under the hoop. You're saying the Mavs should've been the ones to suffer because the Spurs refused to tend to their fallen? I'm not saying it's a classy thing, but this is a championship game. If your own team isn't going to take care of you, why should the other team do it? At the least the trainer next to him should have dragged him further out of bounds and away from the hoop.
 

Stojakapimp

Platinum Member
Jun 28, 2002
2,184
0
0
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
You know LeeTJ, on a side note, I think it's kinda funny who we're rooting for. Me, a King's fan, is now going for the team who beat the Lakers. You, a Laker's fan, is now going for the team who beat the Kings.

:)

actually, i'm a NETS fan. :)

i only root for the lakers when the nets aren't playing. also, no one really likes to talk eastern conference ball.

Nets ALL THE WAY baby.

I feel bad saying this, but I'll have to actuall agree with you. I like the Nets in the East. I don't really have any beef with the Pistons, but I just really like the Net's style of ball moreso than Detroit's.
 

LeeTJ

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2003
4,899
0
0
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
Maybe the Mav's could have actually ran an offensive set. Instead, Dirk just does the probably the most dangerous play. I just don't see how you guys not think that it was classless. Yes, there were other options, but that doesn't negate the fact that Dirk drove right at the man. I mean, it was blatant

i can see where you'd say that, but NO ONE else, no anouncer, no one on TNT, no one is mentioning that.

if it was soo blatant someone would say something about it. matter of fact the announcers at the time expressed minor disbelief that the spurs weren't fouling. actually their comment was, the spurs can't foul because it would put dallas on the line.

that's a pretty telling line.
 

Rickten

Golden Member
Apr 17, 2001
1,607
0
0
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
I think you're all missing the point here. It doesn't matter if he flopped and then got hurt. It doesn't matter if Najera almost got hurt. It doesn't matter that they didn't call a timeout or foul Nowitski. All those things aside, and NBA player SHOULD NOT DRIVE AT AN INJURED MAN AND THEN STEP ON HIM! Please tell me how that is classy

nope I disagree with you. Nowitski is not expected to simply stand around and let the shot clock run out. If the spurs are willing to let their own teamate stay on the floor injured thats a sign to Nowitski "game on".
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
I think you're all missing the point here. It doesn't matter if he flopped and then got hurt. It doesn't matter if Najera almost got hurt. It doesn't matter that they didn't call a timeout or foul Nowitski. All those things aside, and NBA player SHOULD NOT DRIVE AT AN INJURED MAN AND THEN STEP ON HIM! Please tell me how that is classy
No one said its classy or not classy, but its playoff basketball. If SA was concerned about it they should have called a timeout or fouled. They're lucky someone didn't land on him and break a rib or something, then they'd really look foolish for not stopping the play. Taking a cheap shot at the person would be out of line, but continuing play and taking advantage of the situation is what should be done, especially in a conference finals series.
 

LeeTJ

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2003
4,899
0
0
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
You know LeeTJ, on a side note, I think it's kinda funny who we're rooting for. Me, a King's fan, is now going for the team who beat the Lakers. You, a Laker's fan, is now going for the team who beat the Kings.

:)

actually, i'm a NETS fan. :)

i only root for the lakers when the nets aren't playing. also, no one really likes to talk eastern conference ball.

Nets ALL THE WAY baby.

I feel bad saying this, but I'll have to actuall agree with you. I like the Nets in the East. I don't really have any beef with the Pistons, but I just really like the Net's style of ball moreso than Detroit's.

game 1 winners have won 89% of conference championship series.

i'd say things look good for dallas and NJ.
 

Reliant

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2001
3,843
0
76
Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
Maybe the Mav's could have actually ran an offensive set. Instead, Dirk just does the probably the most dangerous play. I just don't see how you guys not think that it was classless. Yes, there were other options, but that doesn't negate the fact that Dirk drove right at the man. I mean, it was blatant

What does it take before others realize this was a stupid thing to do?
What if he hurt Rose even further? What if he hurt himself doing this? Too many bad things could have happened cause of a classless thing action by Dirk.
Well, let's not take class in to this....it was stupid on both parts because the risks were too high....what kind of team doesn't call a timeout when they have an injured player and the ball? But I'm sure Dirk would have regretted if he hurt himself.