otispunkmeyer
Lifer
- Jun 14, 2003
- 10,442
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Czar
does the formula1 use leaded or unleaded?
Originally posted by: biostud
The only proof needed to show that lead can create severe brain damage, is to take a good long look at the spectators.![]()
http://www.f1technical.net/article19.htmlOriginally posted by: Czar
does the formula1 use leaded or unleaded?
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
http://www.f1technical.net/article19.htmlOriginally posted by: Czar
does the formula1 use leaded or unleaded?
At the end of the 1980s the RON 102 restraint continued, and restrictions were now applied to oxygen and nitrogen content (2% in both cases). As time went by, new restraints were established and others, such as steam pressure, density, benzene and lead content, were added. In 1992, the FIA decided that it could be illegal for a substance found in Formula 1 fuel to be missing from commercial gasoline.
Today for Formula 1, FIA adopts the same guidelines adopted by the European Parliament for commercial gasoline in Europe.
For their current engine design they do need leaded gas. To use unleaded would require a change in the valves, piston linings, and head compositions. It could be done.Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
http://www.f1technical.net/article19.htmlOriginally posted by: Czar
does the formula1 use leaded or unleaded?
thanks
At the end of the 1980s the RON 102 restraint continued, and restrictions were now applied to oxygen and nitrogen content (2% in both cases). As time went by, new restraints were established and others, such as steam pressure, density, benzene and lead content, were added. In 1992, the FIA decided that it could be illegal for a substance found in Formula 1 fuel to be missing from commercial gasoline.
Today for Formula 1, FIA adopts the same guidelines adopted by the European Parliament for commercial gasoline in Europe.
I can only assume that f1 uses unleaded gas, then how does the nascar argument that they need the leaded gas for power hold up?
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
I was glancing through ESPN.com and found this article. It shocks, and horrifies me, that the government hasn't forced them to switch. Leaded gas is terrible for the environment and for all the people that watch NASCAR events.
The worst thing is NASCAR doesn't get it.
"Without being able to keep the values lubed, the engines don't work as well and there would be continual problems," Posten said. "We just have not been able to find a solution."
This shouldn't be optional. It shouldn't matter that they would have problems, it's such an unnecessary health risk.
Ugh. I"m disgusted with NASCAR.
Originally posted by: Czar
does the formula1 use leaded or unleaded?
Originally posted by: sandorski
I think a better arguement against Nascar using Leaded Gas is that it(Nascar) should be used as a way to push technolgy developement, rather than cars driving in circles ad nauseum really fast.
Originally posted by: rudder
See all those little airplanes flying around? Most of them use leaded gas also and they burn a lot more than nascar does. Why do they still use leaded gasoline? It has to do with World War II and the engineers at the time. They started using lead and engineers have not found a chemical alternative yet. Although some planes can run on auto gas, 70% of the GA fleet requires leaded gasoline.
Originally posted by: Fausto
This is just an utterly stupid thread. The crap spewed into the air by these cars is the tiniest drop in the largest of buckets. Your lawn mowers collectively emit more crap than these cars ever will.
I'm all for the environment, but let's start with the biggest polluters and work our way down, shall we?
I'm just saying this notion is basically pointless. I'd wager the cars commuting in/out of Atlanta in one day collectively emit more crap into the air than the race cars do over a single weekend of qualifying and racing. Going after them is like slapping a mosquito on your arm and saying you're trying to stamp out Malaria.Originally posted by: JimKiler
Originally posted by: Fausto
This is just an utterly stupid thread. The crap spewed into the air by these cars is the tiniest drop in the largest of buckets. Your lawn mowers collectively emit more crap than these cars ever will.
I'm all for the environment, but let's start with the biggest polluters and work our way down, shall we?
Lets not diss the thread, the guy's heart is in the right direction. I am not sure what the enviromental difference is between leaded and unleaded but I know commercial vehicles like construction trucks, and also boats are now where we should clean up the exhuast as they are not nearly as regulated as cars and will soon become the number 1 polluter soon or may have already.
Originally posted by: Fausto
I'm just saying this notion is basically pointless. I'd wager the cars commuting in/out of Atlanta in one day collectively emit more crap into the air than the race cars do over a single weekend of qualifying and racing. Going after them is like slapping a mosquito on your arm and saying you're trying to stamp out Malaria.Originally posted by: JimKiler
Originally posted by: Fausto
This is just an utterly stupid thread. The crap spewed into the air by these cars is the tiniest drop in the largest of buckets. Your lawn mowers collectively emit more crap than these cars ever will.
I'm all for the environment, but let's start with the biggest polluters and work our way down, shall we?
Lets not diss the thread, the guy's heart is in the right direction. I am not sure what the enviromental difference is between leaded and unleaded but I know commercial vehicles like construction trucks, and also boats are now where we should clean up the exhuast as they are not nearly as regulated as cars and will soon become the number 1 polluter soon or may have already.
Originally posted by: Medicine Bear
Find something more important to be outraged about. Leaded gas is not that big a deal. Just like leaded paint, leaded pencils, etc. Sure lead exposure can cause harm in huge amounts but the amount being put out by a race is minimal. Think about this. If leaded gas is so very bad then why aren't race car drivers dropping dead left and right from cancer?
Originally posted by: Fausto
This is just an utterly stupid thread. The crap spewed into the air by these cars is the tiniest drop in the largest of buckets. Your lawn mowers collectively emit more crap than these cars ever will.
I'm all for the environment, but let's start with the biggest polluters and work our way down, shall we?
Largest non-point source in Atlanta are the cars. Largest point source is GA Power and the coal-fired plants.Originally posted by: Rhin0
Originally posted by: Fausto
This is just an utterly stupid thread. The crap spewed into the air by these cars is the tiniest drop in the largest of buckets. Your lawn mowers collectively emit more crap than these cars ever will.
I'm all for the environment, but let's start with the biggest polluters and work our way down, shall we?
Biggest polluter is automobiles. Try to take a drive in Atlanta, LA, Columbus, Cleveland during rush hour and you'll know why right away. The # of cars is absurd! But you are right this is a limited sporting event, like once a week. Truly is a drop in the bucket!
BTW- my John Deere and Kawi lawnmowers both run very clean. They both meet EPA emissions standards for either 06 or 07
Originally posted by: Fausto
Largest non-point source in Atlanta are the cars. Largest point source is GA Power and the coal-fired plants.Originally posted by: Rhin0
Originally posted by: Fausto
This is just an utterly stupid thread. The crap spewed into the air by these cars is the tiniest drop in the largest of buckets. Your lawn mowers collectively emit more crap than these cars ever will.
I'm all for the environment, but let's start with the biggest polluters and work our way down, shall we?
Biggest polluter is automobiles. Try to take a drive in Atlanta, LA, Columbus, Cleveland during rush hour and you'll know why right away. The # of cars is absurd! But you are right this is a limited sporting event, like once a week. Truly is a drop in the bucket!
BTW- my John Deere and Kawi lawnmowers both run very clean. They both meet EPA emissions standards for either 06 or 07
Originally posted by: Fausto
Largest non-point source in Atlanta are the cars. Largest point source is GA Power and the coal-fired plants.Originally posted by: Rhin0
Originally posted by: Fausto
This is just an utterly stupid thread. The crap spewed into the air by these cars is the tiniest drop in the largest of buckets. Your lawn mowers collectively emit more crap than these cars ever will.
I'm all for the environment, but let's start with the biggest polluters and work our way down, shall we?
Biggest polluter is automobiles. Try to take a drive in Atlanta, LA, Columbus, Cleveland during rush hour and you'll know why right away. The # of cars is absurd! But you are right this is a limited sporting event, like once a week. Truly is a drop in the bucket!
BTW- my John Deere and Kawi lawnmowers both run very clean. They both meet EPA emissions standards for either 06 or 07
Originally posted by: Fausto
Largest non-point source in Atlanta are the cars. Largest point source is GA Power and the coal-fired plants.Originally posted by: Rhin0
Originally posted by: Fausto
This is just an utterly stupid thread. The crap spewed into the air by these cars is the tiniest drop in the largest of buckets. Your lawn mowers collectively emit more crap than these cars ever will.
I'm all for the environment, but let's start with the biggest polluters and work our way down, shall we?
Biggest polluter is automobiles. Try to take a drive in Atlanta, LA, Columbus, Cleveland during rush hour and you'll know why right away. The # of cars is absurd! But you are right this is a limited sporting event, like once a week. Truly is a drop in the bucket!
BTW- my John Deere and Kawi lawnmowers both run very clean. They both meet EPA emissions standards for either 06 or 07