• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
The market speaks and says San Francisco is a more desirable place to live than most places in America. People with money tend not to like strip malls.
Give it 5-10 years, then it will be just like St. Louis in the late 60's. The local politicians there need to come visit the Missouri State History Museum to see the exhibit on St. Louis in the 60's - exactly what San Fran is trying now. Then, they should take a nice drive through north St. Louis in the middle of the afternoon (in their bulletproof limos, of course) to see what it's like a little further down the road. The outcomes are so predictable that it's sad that anyone would really think their social experiments would work.
 
While the debate hotly rages over the shit hole index of San Fransisco, why no discussion of Boehner's district that is a definite hot bed of poverty and sinking fast?
 
You just have to love it when some bizarre, hideous, and perverse relic of religious insanity amounting to child sexual assault done without consent to babies is seen as a parental right by brain dead libertarians. Hideousness in the name of freedom is not freedom for the victim.

Give me one good reason why we shouldn't ritualistically mutilate the genitals of infants!

Ah, crap.
 
You just have to love it when some bizarre, hideous, and perverse relic of religious insanity amounting to child sexual assault done without consent to babies is seen as a parental right by brain dead libertarians. Hideousness in the name of freedom is not freedom for the victim.
So, you would oppose female genital mutilation by Muslims too I take it?
 
Give me one good reason why we shouldn't ritualistically mutilate the genitals of infants!

Ah, crap.

Hotly debated topic:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_analysis_of_circumcision



The World Health Organization (WHO; 2007), the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS; 2007), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; 2008) state that evidence indicates male circumcision significantly reduces the risk of HIV acquisition by men during penile-vaginal sex, but also state that circumcision only provides partial protection and should not replace other interventions to prevent transmission of HIV.

CDC study of the above: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/circumcision.htm


A Pro~Circumcision site: http://www.circinfo.net/benefits_outweigh_the_risks.html


A more neutral analysis:
http://www.bing.com/health/article/mayo-127342/Circumcision-male?q=benefits+of+circumcision&FORM=FFF

http://www.urologychannel.com/circumcision/benefits.shtml


http://familydoctor.org/online/famdocen/home/men/reproductive/042.html

...not to mention all the newly unemployed Mohels!! 😵



****


Risks:

http://children.webmd.com/tc/circumcision-risks

A directory of potential complications from badly done circumcisions NSFW: http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/
 
Last edited:
Found him:

SFCraig.jpg
 
You just have to love it when some bizarre, hideous, and perverse relic of religious insanity amounting to child sexual assault done without consent to babies is seen as a parental right by brain dead libertarians. Hideousness in the name of freedom is not freedom for the victim.

I guess if it were up to you, my parents would be in prison? Would that make you feel safer?
 
I guess if it were up to you, my parents would be in prison? Would that make you feel safer?

Your parents can't be held accountable for things that weren't a crime at the time they were committed, nor can they be held accountable for morality they didn't have. Those who sleep aren't guilty of anything. They are just robotic machines. The only place we can act is in the now. We can make child mutilation illegal and we can try to show folk what it really is.
 
I think that's already illegal in all or most of the US. It's only male mutilation that still happens.

I would imagine it's pretty insulting to the actual victims of mutilation that you would equate circumcision with female genital mutilation. Sad.
 
Hate to break it to people, but I'd be willing to bet I could find similar pictures in many major liberal cities. I'd imagine a lot of it happens in conservative ones as well, just behind bathroom stall doors.
 
Your parents can't be held accountable for things that weren't a crime at the time they were committed, nor can they be held accountable for morality they didn't have. Those who sleep aren't guilty of anything. They are just robotic machines. The only place we can act is in the now. We can make child mutilation illegal and we can try to show folk what it really is.

Circumcision is not mutilation. I have a list of women that can confirm this. 😎
 
Have you been top the Bay Area? Those weren't even the "extremist". That place is a fucking shithole.

Yeah I lived there and while it's over crowded it definately isn't the way it was portrayed in that article and yes you knuckle dragging moron, those are extremists. I'm guessing those pics were taken in the Castro where you probably stayed when you were in the Bay Area.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top