Name world class cities with no water around it

[Pandamonium]

Originally posted by: Xylitol
chicago?

lake michigan?

 

[darkxshade]

The Vatican City?

 

[AccruedExpenditure]

Atlanta isn't word class

 

[ZetaEpyon]

Originally posted by: ViviTheMage
Minneapolis

Nevermind the Mississippi River.

 

[Newbian]

Originally posted by: ViviTheMage
Minneapolis

Near many lakes, I should know since I lived there for a awhile.

 

[DomS]

Paris?

 

[Newbian]

Originally posted by: DomS
Paris?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seine

 

[sdifox]

Originally posted by: shafeen
Hyderabad,Bangalore don't have water around them>>they can be considered as major.....at least in Asia <<

also tokyo/vegas don't have water around them.....what about berlin and moscow

You mean a river and a lake is not enough for Hyderabad?

Bangalore built lakes

Tokyo is on the Tokyo Bay, and a few rivers runs through it.

Vegas is a manufactured city, plus they pipe in from Hoover Dam.

 

[Demo24]

Originally posted by: Beattie
Atlanta

This was one of my suggestions, closest thing to it is Lake lanier...if you can call it a lake these days.


I don't believe Munich is on a river.

 

[PepePeru]

Sao Paulo
New Delhi
Mexico City

 

[Newbian]

Originally posted by: Beattie
Atlanta

Go watch the episode of Futurama that deals with that place.

 

[MrPickins]

Originally posted by: G Wizard
Sao Paulo
New Delhi
Mexico City

Mexico City was originally in the middle of Lake Texcoco.

 

[EagleKeeper]

Las Vegas

 

[DomS]

Originally posted by: Newbian

Originally posted by: DomS
Paris?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seine

i thought he menat like ocean or sea....

 

[MrChad]

Moscow

 

[MrPickins]

Originally posted by: DomS

Originally posted by: Newbian

Originally posted by: DomS
Paris?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seine

i thought he menat like ocean or sea....

Originally posted by: DaWhim
I have lived in HK and NY, now in london. all these cities are either has a river run through it or right next to the sea.

Reading comprehension is your friend.

 

[sdifox]

Originally posted by: G Wizard
Sao Paulo
New Delhi
Mexico City

São Paulo has Pinheiros River and Tietê River

New Delhi has Yamuna nearby.

Old Mexico was on water

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi...1/1c/Oldmexicocity.jpg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Texcoco

 

[sdifox]

Originally posted by: MrPickins

Originally posted by: DomS

Originally posted by: Newbian

Originally posted by: DomS
Paris?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seine

i thought he menat like ocean or sea....

Originally posted by: DaWhim
I have lived in HK and NY, now in london. all these cities are either has a river run through it or right next to the sea.

Reading comprehension is your friend.

Or the title of the thread "Name world class cities with no water around it"

 

[Newbian]

Originally posted by: MrChad
Moscow

Has been talked about already.

 

[imported_apocalypse]

Everyone needs water, it would probably be infeasible to have a major city and have to pipe in enough water from a long distance..

 

[MrChad]

Originally posted by: Newbian

Originally posted by: MrChad
Moscow

Has been talked about already.

Whoops, missed that.

 

[BW86]

Madrid?

 

[imported_Imp]

... Edmonton, Alberta? It's not that great, and I don't know what it's beside, but it's in the prairies.

Makes sense for it to be so hard to find one. They couldn't and still can't exactly supply a 'great' city without shipping lanes.

 

[sdifox]

Originally posted by: BW86
Madrid?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lozoya_River

 

[AstroManLuca]

Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
Las Vegas

This.

And Phoenix. EDIT: Nevermind, I guess even Phoenix has a river next to it.