MagicConch
Golden Member
- Apr 7, 2005
- 1,239
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: Howard
Philosophers
Doctors
Not sure
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
doctors
research scientists
vets- animal doctors don't make much money and do so much good![]()
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Originally posted by: ed21x
1. Soldiers
2. Missionaries
#2 would be on my list of jobs I least respect.
QFTMFT.
Originally posted by: Special K
1. Soldier
2. Firefighter
3. Police Officer
EDIT: I didn't even see Chaotic42's post![]()
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
doctors
research scientists
vets- animal doctors don't make much money and do so much good![]()
If they wanted to just help people, they wouldn't need to be preaching religion along with their good work. The fact that they are bible thumping indicates that they aren't doing it solely with good intentions, which is a shame because they otherwise go through a lot of suffering in doing their good deeds.Originally posted by: Crono
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Originally posted by: ed21x
1. Soldiers
2. Missionaries
#2 would be on my list of jobs I least respect.
QFTMFT.
I think people who say that only know about missionaries in theory in their own minds and haven't met real missionaries out in "the field". Missionaries get paid little (if anything) for their own basic needs (let alone luxuries), they do a lot of good works in many communities around the world. Many are killed for their beliefs, even though they don't force their beliefs on people, but just quietly help and teach anyone willing to listen. Obviously there are some who wear the guise of missionaries, and are really in it for some ulterior motive, and a result of that is they are bad. But that could be said of any profession, and by and large most missionaries are helping people and not hurting.
Originally posted by: Locut0s
No I would not consider those humanitarians to be less respectful. Like I was saying before I think all religion is harmful to some degree. again let me reiterate I don't disrespect the work the missionaries do but the reasons they do it. Given the option of no humanitarian work or missionary work I would chose to have the missionaries doing their work I would much rather see secularist organizations though. Your argument about Indian casts is a red herring though. It sounds nice to say 'see even some religious organizations practice anti humanitarian activities' and try to turn the argument on its head however like I was saying it's not the humanitarian activities that I'm against but having them tied to religion. Which in the case of your argument about Indian casts is the very problem in the first place.
Originally posted by: ViRGE
If they wanted to just help people, they wouldn't need to be preaching religion along with their good work. The fact that they are bible thumping indicates that they aren't doing it solely with good intentions, which is a shame because they otherwise go through a lot of suffering in doing their good deeds.
Originally posted by: ViRGE
If they wanted to just help people, they wouldn't need to be preaching religion along with their good work. The fact that they are bible thumping indicates that they aren't doing it solely with good intentions, which is a shame because they otherwise go through a lot of suffering in doing their good deeds.Originally posted by: Crono
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Originally posted by: ed21x
1. Soldiers
2. Missionaries
#2 would be on my list of jobs I least respect.
QFTMFT.
I think people who say that only know about missionaries in theory in their own minds and haven't met real missionaries out in "the field". Missionaries get paid little (if anything) for their own basic needs (let alone luxuries), they do a lot of good works in many communities around the world. Many are killed for their beliefs, even though they don't force their beliefs on people, but just quietly help and teach anyone willing to listen. Obviously there are some who wear the guise of missionaries, and are really in it for some ulterior motive, and a result of that is they are bad. But that could be said of any profession, and by and large most missionaries are helping people and not hurting.
Originally posted by: Praxis1452
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Ok we aren't going to be able to see eye to eye on this one I can see that. I in fact do respect the work that missionaries do I just don't respect the reason they do it. I am an atheist personally and don't like the idea of others trying to convert people to their religion. It is not the same thing as saying you don't need to be American to help those in need because Americans who help out those in need are no different than anyone else who helps out those in need. Conversion is one of the prime objectives of missionaries on the other hand.
So? They aren't trying to convert others because it earns them a gold star in heaven. They are trying to convert others because they honestly believe that it is the best thing for them. ALL humanitarians operate on this exact premise. Now, some are overzealous in their work--denying medical care for non-converts is despicable in my mind--but secular humanitarians have fallen into similar traps when it comes to thinking that they know what's "best" for others.
Back in the day, some Indians actually resented humanitarian efforts for the lower castes, because it was their "place" to suffer, and relieving that suffering only meant that they'd have to spend more cycles of reincarnation in lower castes, thus doing them a disservice. Do you find those humanitarians to be on the list of people you "least respect" as well?
lol... Good intentions are all mistaken. Every last one. Every action is for the self. I often helping people whether it be with work or something else but I don't misguide myself believing that I'm just SUCH A WONDERFUL PERSON for doing these things. When I do them I feel good and they benefit as well. It's good for both people. I have no problem with missionaries who view it as an exchange. They do goodwill towards the people and hope that they become X religion or share their views. We all try to convert people towards our views.: any time an argument occurs it happens. It's part of life. Whether it be subtler or not it makes no difference to me.
I do not say however that the people don't honestly believe in their selflessness. They do and that's why they are wrong.
In response to the Indians you used religion as a counter to religion? huh? Sure makes sense. Why doesn't everyone believe in heaven etc if it makes them feel better?
So what do I actually disagree with? I disagree with the idea that the missionaries are pure in their actions and that they misguide themselves when doing so, which happens to include almost all of them.
edit: I commented so much that I totally forgot the topic haha. I don't think a general profession is a good way to judge at all. What professions do I think would be awesome though?
1) Philosophy - Academia
2) Comedian
3) Artists - all types I think. If your incredibly good at something your and have dedicated yourself to that aspect I think it's awesome.
Originally posted by: RadiclDreamer
Originally posted by: Farang
Doctors
Architects
Novelists
Most doctors are spoiled assholes, I work in a hospital so I have first hand experience with that
Originally posted by: Locut0s
Doctors working for Médecins Sans Frontières and other such organizations.
Journalists who risk their lives in war torn countries or other danger zones.