- Jan 5, 2005
- 52
- 0
- 0
Hello,
I've been using some rather generic memory for the last couple of years. What I have is an MSI K7N2-L motherboard with one of the earlier interpretations of "dual channel" DDR memory. it has the fairly common 3-slot setup with one slot offset from the other two to identify the seperate channels. For a couple of years I've been running generic memory in this config:
Slot 0 - 256Mb "Transcend technologies" (single sided) DDR333/PC2700
Slot 1 - 256Mb "Transcend technologies" (single sided) DDR333/PC2700
Slot 2 - 512Mb "Avant Technologies" (double sided) DDR333/PC2700
I just got a set of mushkin 1Gb (2x512mb) double sided DDR400/PC3200 and replaced my memory with these new modules (entirely). When I booted up I found that my timings were actually the exact same as my generic memory, and when I booted Windows it actually took a little longer than before.
My system is running as such-
AMD AthlonXP 1700+ @ 1708MHz
FSB overclocked from 133 to 155
DRAM ratio 1:1 for a DDR rate of 310MHz
My timings are coming out as 2.5-3-3-6, but only because I modified the stock settings of 2.5-4-4-7 - exactly the same as my generic memory. So right now I'm sitting here wondering - why did I just spend $145 to replace my memory with the exact same thing? The only difference is that this memory is rated for higher speeds than my old stuff, but for this computer as it is, what was the point?
Would it benefit me to boost the DRAM ratio so the memory operates at higher speeds? Personally, I ran with my memory/fsb async, and I found that running it at 1:1, though technically "slower", provided a very noticable performance increase.
The part that really disappointed me was when I opened up CPU-Z, and saw this....
Module 0     DDR-SDRAM PC3200 - 512 MBytes
Module 1     DDR-SDRAM PC3200 - 512 MBytes
Even my generic transcend memory is branded with a brand-name in CPU-Z, but this mushkin stuff seems even more generic than my generic memory!
What should I do? Did I waste my money?
Also, what are the benefits & downsides of single- and double- sided memory? As far as I could tell, double-sided memories meant more memory chips which meant less memory per chip, which mean less depand per chip and thus higher performance. However, that idea was simply pieced together from partial knowledge and partial "hypothesis".
I appreciate your feedback/feelings/etc...
I've been using some rather generic memory for the last couple of years. What I have is an MSI K7N2-L motherboard with one of the earlier interpretations of "dual channel" DDR memory. it has the fairly common 3-slot setup with one slot offset from the other two to identify the seperate channels. For a couple of years I've been running generic memory in this config:
Slot 0 - 256Mb "Transcend technologies" (single sided) DDR333/PC2700
Slot 1 - 256Mb "Transcend technologies" (single sided) DDR333/PC2700
Slot 2 - 512Mb "Avant Technologies" (double sided) DDR333/PC2700
I just got a set of mushkin 1Gb (2x512mb) double sided DDR400/PC3200 and replaced my memory with these new modules (entirely). When I booted up I found that my timings were actually the exact same as my generic memory, and when I booted Windows it actually took a little longer than before.
My system is running as such-
AMD AthlonXP 1700+ @ 1708MHz
FSB overclocked from 133 to 155
DRAM ratio 1:1 for a DDR rate of 310MHz
My timings are coming out as 2.5-3-3-6, but only because I modified the stock settings of 2.5-4-4-7 - exactly the same as my generic memory. So right now I'm sitting here wondering - why did I just spend $145 to replace my memory with the exact same thing? The only difference is that this memory is rated for higher speeds than my old stuff, but for this computer as it is, what was the point?
Would it benefit me to boost the DRAM ratio so the memory operates at higher speeds? Personally, I ran with my memory/fsb async, and I found that running it at 1:1, though technically "slower", provided a very noticable performance increase.
The part that really disappointed me was when I opened up CPU-Z, and saw this....
Module 0     DDR-SDRAM PC3200 - 512 MBytes
Module 1     DDR-SDRAM PC3200 - 512 MBytes
Even my generic transcend memory is branded with a brand-name in CPU-Z, but this mushkin stuff seems even more generic than my generic memory!
What should I do? Did I waste my money?
Also, what are the benefits & downsides of single- and double- sided memory? As far as I could tell, double-sided memories meant more memory chips which meant less memory per chip, which mean less depand per chip and thus higher performance. However, that idea was simply pieced together from partial knowledge and partial "hypothesis".
I appreciate your feedback/feelings/etc...