Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Wouldn't Nader do more good trying to gain support for his causes rather than trying to jump up and down every election cycle for no good reason? Plus, we've already got Ron Paul...how many alternative candidates do we need who's only claim to fame is being an alternative?
Some of his core positions are best expressed in the difficulty he faces trying to get on the ballot and get a fair shake in what he believes is a two-party dictatorship. He advocates minor party rights, so it makes perfect sense for him to be the alternative candidate.
Not really. I don't like our two party system either, but changing that starts at the lower levels, where it's entirely possible that we WILL see someone other than someone with a D or R next to their name hold office. If Nader really wanted to make an impact, he'd organize a grass-roots independent movement at the state level across the country. Instead, he's just trying to make as much noise as possible every 4 years, then just go away until the next election.