Clinton lied under oath to a grand jury, he suborned perjury, he lied to his cabinet, he lied to the american people, he lied to his family, and he alone could have stopped the death of 3000 people on 9/11 if he had made the Gore Commission recommendations on Airport Safety law, and apprehended Bin Laden.Bush has only lied to Congress, the American people and the world
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Clinton lied under oath to a grand jury, he suborned perjury, he lied to his cabinet, he lied to the american people, he lied to his family, and he alone could have stopped the death of 3000 people on 9/11 if he had made the Gore Commission recommendations on Airport Safety law, and apprehended Bin Laden.Bush has only lied to Congress, the American people and the world
The 9/11 terrorists were already in th U.S when Bush took office, Clarke has already under oath stated that 9/11 could not have been prevented by Bush even if every single recommendation Clarke made to him had been implemented on Jan 26th, 2001.
liberals lie, ignore facts, distort and rewrite history, and generally accept no responsibility for their role in allowing terrorists to repeatedly attack the U.S. and U.S. interests.
I'll wager Karl Rove and Cheney are contributing money to Nader as well!!I was wondering how the hell nader was getting all his money
What are you new here? People like Dave and conjur among other liberals here are chock full of hate. They dole it out all day on these boards. This ticks off those of us who don't subscribe to their hardcore liberal fear mongering. It's just fuel for our fire.Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Clinton lied under oath to a grand jury, he suborned perjury, he lied to his cabinet, he lied to the american people, he lied to his family, and he alone could have stopped the death of 3000 people on 9/11 if he had made the Gore Commission recommendations on Airport Safety law, and apprehended Bin Laden.Bush has only lied to Congress, the American people and the world
The 9/11 terrorists were already in th U.S when Bush took office, Clarke has already under oath stated that 9/11 could not have been prevented by Bush even if every single recommendation Clarke made to him had been implemented on Jan 26th, 2001.
liberals lie, ignore facts, distort and rewrite history, and generally accept no responsibility for their role in allowing terrorists to repeatedly attack the U.S. and U.S. interests.
Where does all your hate come from?
Originally posted by: XZeroII
What are you new here? People like Dave and conjur among other liberals here are chock full of hate. They dole it out all day on these boards. This ticks off those of us who don't subscribe to their hardcore liberal fear mongering. It's just fuel for our fire.Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Clinton lied under oath to a grand jury, he suborned perjury, he lied to his cabinet, he lied to the american people, he lied to his family, and he alone could have stopped the death of 3000 people on 9/11 if he had made the Gore Commission recommendations on Airport Safety law, and apprehended Bin Laden.Bush has only lied to Congress, the American people and the world
The 9/11 terrorists were already in th U.S when Bush took office, Clarke has already under oath stated that 9/11 could not have been prevented by Bush even if every single recommendation Clarke made to him had been implemented on Jan 26th, 2001.
liberals lie, ignore facts, distort and rewrite history, and generally accept no responsibility for their role in allowing terrorists to repeatedly attack the U.S. and U.S. interests.
Where does all your hate come from?
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Gee, kind of ironic that Nader is calling for Bush's impeachment, while at the same time he's going to help George Bush get re-elected by taking away votes for Kerry!
I can't explain why he is, but some of the posts here just tick me off. I try to keep cool, but sometimes I lose it when I see so much crap being posted that I can't stand it anymore. 80% of the time, it's liberals who are ticking me off. 50% of that 80% is Dave. Conjur is simply turning into a fear monger like Dave. He posts only bad news and anti-bush stuff. Granted, people only post things that conform to what they believe in, but sometimes it all goes too far.Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: XZeroII
What are you new here? People like Dave and conjur among other liberals here are chock full of hate. They dole it out all day on these boards. This ticks off those of us who don't subscribe to their hardcore liberal fear mongering. It's just fuel for our fire.Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Clinton lied under oath to a grand jury, he suborned perjury, he lied to his cabinet, he lied to the american people, he lied to his family, and he alone could have stopped the death of 3000 people on 9/11 if he had made the Gore Commission recommendations on Airport Safety law, and apprehended Bin Laden.Bush has only lied to Congress, the American people and the world
The 9/11 terrorists were already in th U.S when Bush took office, Clarke has already under oath stated that 9/11 could not have been prevented by Bush even if every single recommendation Clarke made to him had been implemented on Jan 26th, 2001.
liberals lie, ignore facts, distort and rewrite history, and generally accept no responsibility for their role in allowing terrorists to repeatedly attack the U.S. and U.S. interests.
Where does all your hate come from?
Huh? Dave is just a loser who thinks the world is out to get him. I don't see any hate from conjur's posts at all. While the board's best conservative - Cad - is quite reasonable and debates with civility.
That still doesn't answer my question as to why heartsurgeon is so spiteful towards liberals in general.
Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
While the board's best conservative - Cad - is quite reasonable and debates with civility.
Originally posted by: XZeroII
I can't explain why he is, but some of the posts here just tick me off. I try to keep cool, but sometimes I lose it when I see so much crap being posted that I can't stand it anymore. 80% of the time, it's liberals who are ticking me off. 50% of that 80% is Dave. Conjur is simply turning into a fear monger like Dave. He posts only bad news and anti-bush stuff. Granted, people only post things that conform to what they believe in, but sometimes it all goes too far.Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: XZeroII
What are you new here? People like Dave and conjur among other liberals here are chock full of hate. They dole it out all day on these boards. This ticks off those of us who don't subscribe to their hardcore liberal fear mongering. It's just fuel for our fire.Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Clinton lied under oath to a grand jury, he suborned perjury, he lied to his cabinet, he lied to the american people, he lied to his family, and he alone could have stopped the death of 3000 people on 9/11 if he had made the Gore Commission recommendations on Airport Safety law, and apprehended Bin Laden.Bush has only lied to Congress, the American people and the world
The 9/11 terrorists were already in th U.S when Bush took office, Clarke has already under oath stated that 9/11 could not have been prevented by Bush even if every single recommendation Clarke made to him had been implemented on Jan 26th, 2001.
liberals lie, ignore facts, distort and rewrite history, and generally accept no responsibility for their role in allowing terrorists to repeatedly attack the U.S. and U.S. interests.
Where does all your hate come from?
Huh? Dave is just a loser who thinks the world is out to get him. I don't see any hate from conjur's posts at all. While the board's best conservative - Cad - is quite reasonable and debates with civility.
That still doesn't answer my question as to why heartsurgeon is so spiteful towards liberals in general.
I think Heart is full of hate so much because people personally attack him so much. They dance around the point he is trying to make and use logical fallacies to discredit what he says. I know this is frustrating because it's happened to me many times. Trust me, it's tough being on the right side of zero on this board. You feel pretty lonely lots of times.
I think John Dean made an interesting case that he could quite rightly be impeached. That's a legal discussion, and if Bush commited an impeachable offense, I don't think calling for his impeachment is uncivil. I think letting it slide and NOT calling for his impeachment would be abandoning our civil rights and responsibilities.Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
I believe that calling for President Bush to be impeached is utterly uncivil.
I agree. The good news about our Constitution and our laws is, you have the right to express your opinion. It helps your case if you can justify it with a few facts.I believe that saying I have no right to my opinions or should be banned because you don't agree with the facts I present is uncivil.
I think Clinton disgraced the dignity of the Presidency with his sexual behavior, and I know he broke the law when he committed purjury. Considering that Bush's lies to congress and the citizens of this country has resulted in hundreds of American deaths and thousands of American casualties with deceitful excuses about why we went into Iraq, while simultaneously reducing our ability to go after the real enemy, Bin Laden, in Afghanistan, and running up a half trillion dollar deficit along the way, I think a good case can be made that he was at least as uncivil as ClintonI believe the actions of William Jefferson Clinton were about as uncivil as you could get in the White House.
Then, if you're one of those who bashes "tax and spend liberals," I have to ask you how conservative it is to spend so much without providing some means, through taxation or otherwise, to pay for it? In case you haven't checked lately, that has a lot of congressional conservatives scratching their heads, too. :QI hold conservative viewpoints.
Oops... Better watch that bleeding heart. Somebody may mistake you for a closet liberal.I pay gobs of taxes, i give lots to charity, i support my community.
I provide care to indigents and those that have no insurance or money routinely.
I have real friends that are white, black, christians, jews and muslims, democrats, republicans, and socialists.
I make the world a better place every day.
I have personally helped thousands of people to live a better life.
I won't toot my own horn, but I'm a liberal, and I really hope I don't come close to that cliched stereotype. If it helps, I could introduce you to some of my very liberal, very successful, very tax paying, intelligent and compassionate friends.I suspect the loudest liberal voices on this forum have done litterally nothing to actually help anyone other than themselves.
Prove me wrong. I really hope you can.
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
While the board's best conservative - Cad - is quite reasonable and debates with civility.
:lips:
I love you too
CkG
Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
While the board's best conservative - Cad - is quite reasonable and debates with civility.
:lips:
I love you too
CkG
Actually, I consider the title of "board's best conservative" to be quite an insult.![]()
Don't stroke yourself.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
I don't. I like to think of it as a badge of honor![]()
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
While the board's best conservative - Cad - is quite reasonable and debates with civility.
:lips:
I love you too
CkG
