OrByte
Diamond Member
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Gaard
Damn, first he admits to condoning torture, then he tucks tail and runs when confronted with evidence that he's wrong. Is this kid a typical Bush supporter?
I think we can break down the blind Bush supporters into several categories. I'm not going to name names so I can't give examples but this is a classification of the various kind of responses when you get to the breaking point of a P&N discussion. What is a breaking point? It's the point when a poster realizes they are full of it and that the other person knows it too.
The cut-and-runner: When faced with overwhelming facts, this poster just gives up and goes home. Simple as that, you won't hear from them again until the next time you own them on an absurd statement of theirs and they once again cut-and-run.
The rinse-and-repeater: this poster just repeates his original premise (or usually just wildly wrong statement). The poster isn't really listening, but just presents his belief as truth and just presents his belief as truth and just presents his belief as truth and just presents his belief as truth and just presents his belief as truth.
The questioner: when you ask this person a legitimate question they just return a question with a question. How do you support the 3 strikes law might lead to a question like, "So are you saying you think people that fornicate with donkeys should simply be let offf the hook?!" Often these questions have an indignant tone.
The personalizer: this poster attempts to drown out difficult situations in personal attacks. The poster will broaden the debate to include your overall personality and humanity until the discussion is so off topic that the original parties have forgotten the real issue he got owned on.
you should make your own thread with this as a topic, and sticky it.
imho
😀