Mythbusters to take on "the plane and the treadmill" conundrum?

Page 18 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Tommouse
I haven't read the whole thread, so forgive me, but its a bit big now and I have things to do :p

My understanding is that the treadmill matches the speed of the thrust of the plane, resulting in it being stationary, relative to the floor(not treadmill) or air. This would mean it's airspeed is 0, and with no airspeed there is no lift and no flight. For example think about a plane that is stationary and with a huge fan in front of it. It would eventually take off as there is enough airspeed but no actual speed, it all comes down to airspeed.

how is it going to match the thrust of the engines? its not. its impossible.

what it can try to do is match the wheel speed. wbut how thrust works it is not going to be possible.

the question is bad.
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
If there is any doubt the education system in the US is broken this thread should erase the doubt.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: felony27
hmmm heres an idea lets close this thread and let mythbusters solve...what an idea.

Can't happen. They don't have this imaginary treadmill that breaks the laws of physics.

In any real world scenario it's obvious the plane can take off. I don't think anybody really believe this is not the case.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: sao123
Originally posted by: ElFenix
the whole thing depends on how much force the treadmill can put through the wheels.
if you've got 10,000 lbs of thrust from the turbines, you're going to need 10,000 pounds of force coming through the wheels to keep the plane from moving.


free spinning wheels will allow on a transfer of force up to a maximum of the friction generated between the wheels, the lubricant, and the center axle. Which in this case is not significant.

which is why this whole problem is stupid. for the plane to take off, the wheels are going to be spinning much faster than the conveyor belt. but the question has assumed that the wheels and conveyor belt are spinning at exactly the same rate. no normal wheel will do that. the only way it'd happen is if there is lots of friction in the wheel. so the problem has already assumed that the necessary friction is there. so the plane won't take off, but only because the problem is stupid and has nothing to do with reality.

The wheel doesn't need friction.

If the wheel was on the treadmill with out the plane it would not spin. Nothing is connected to the axle so not torque is applied.

The wheels on the plane spin so a force must be applied to the torque must be applied to the wheels otherwise they would not spin. Friction itself can not make the wheels spin. The kinetic energy of the spinning wheel increased the kinetic energy of the plane must decrease.


Have you ever pushed a car with the engine off or dead? The wheels rotate even though there is no power applied to the wheels right? The wheels rotate because the rolling friction of the bearings is less than the sliding friction of the rubber and asphalt... the wheel has no choice but to rotate.

Take a heavy box of books placed on thick carpet, and another equally heavy box on top of the first box. Push the top box only. Because the friction between the bottom box and the carpet is greater than the friction between the two boxes, the boxes will slide against each other before they both move together. This is exactly the same transfer of motion that rotates the wheels in your car when you push on the car body in neutral, and is the reason the wheels rotate on a plane when the engines push against the body of the plane. There is no power applied to the wheels. Friction is the only force causing the wheels to rotate.

Are we clear on that part at least?
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: sao123
Originally posted by: ElFenix
the whole thing depends on how much force the treadmill can put through the wheels.
if you've got 10,000 lbs of thrust from the turbines, you're going to need 10,000 pounds of force coming through the wheels to keep the plane from moving.


free spinning wheels will allow on a transfer of force up to a maximum of the friction generated between the wheels, the lubricant, and the center axle. Which in this case is not significant.

which is why this whole problem is stupid. for the plane to take off, the wheels are going to be spinning much faster than the conveyor belt. but the question has assumed that the wheels and conveyor belt are spinning at exactly the same rate. no normal wheel will do that. the only way it'd happen is if there is lots of friction in the wheel. so the problem has already assumed that the necessary friction is there. so the plane won't take off, but only because the problem is stupid and has nothing to do with reality.

The wheel doesn't need friction.

If the wheel was on the treadmill with out the plane it would not spin. Nothing is connected to the axle so not torque is applied.

The wheels on the plane spin so a force must be applied to the torque must be applied to the wheels otherwise they would not spin. Friction itself can not make the wheels spin. The kinetic energy of the spinning wheel increased the kinetic energy of the plane must decrease.


Have you ever pushed a car with the engine off or dead? The wheels rotate even though there is no power applied to the wheels right? The wheels rotate because the rolling friction of the bearings is less than the sliding friction of the rubber and asphalt... the wheel has no choice but to rotate.

Take a heavy box of books placed on thick carpet, and another equally heavy box on top of the first box. Push the top box only. Because the friction between the bottom box and the carpet is greater than the friction between the two boxes, the boxes will slide against each other before they both move together. This is exactly the same transfer of motion that rotates the wheels in your car when you push on the car body in neutral, and is the reason the wheels rotate on a plane when the engines push against the body of the plane. There is no power applied to the wheels. Friction is the only force causing the wheels to rotate.

Are we clear on that part at least?

Which part of a wheel with no axle on a treadmill don't you understand. For reference that is not that same as a car.

I didn't posted it because this whole thread has assumed it but we are talking about the case with infinite static friction so the wheel can not slide.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: sao123
Originally posted by: ElFenix
the whole thing depends on how much force the treadmill can put through the wheels.
if you've got 10,000 lbs of thrust from the turbines, you're going to need 10,000 pounds of force coming through the wheels to keep the plane from moving.


free spinning wheels will allow on a transfer of force up to a maximum of the friction generated between the wheels, the lubricant, and the center axle. Which in this case is not significant.

which is why this whole problem is stupid. for the plane to take off, the wheels are going to be spinning much faster than the conveyor belt. but the question has assumed that the wheels and conveyor belt are spinning at exactly the same rate. no normal wheel will do that. the only way it'd happen is if there is lots of friction in the wheel. so the problem has already assumed that the necessary friction is there. so the plane won't take off, but only because the problem is stupid and has nothing to do with reality.

The wheel doesn't need friction.

If the wheel was on the treadmill with out the plane it would not spin. Nothing is connected to the axle so not torque is applied.

The wheels on the plane spin so a force must be applied to the torque must be applied to the wheels otherwise they would not spin. Friction itself can not make the wheels spin. The kinetic energy of the spinning wheel increased the kinetic energy of the plane must decrease.


Have you ever pushed a car with the engine off or dead? The wheels rotate even though there is no power applied to the wheels right? The wheels rotate because the rolling friction of the bearings is less than the sliding friction of the rubber and asphalt... the wheel has no choice but to rotate.

Take a heavy box of books placed on thick carpet, and another equally heavy box on top of the first box. Push the top box only. Because the friction between the bottom box and the carpet is greater than the friction between the two boxes, the boxes will slide against each other before they both move together. This is exactly the same transfer of motion that rotates the wheels in your car when you push on the car body in neutral, and is the reason the wheels rotate on a plane when the engines push against the body of the plane. There is no power applied to the wheels. Friction is the only force causing the wheels to rotate.

Are we clear on that part at least?


but if you have hardwood floors then they move. well clean polished hardwood floors. so you are wrong! WRONGB! HAHAHHHAHA WRONG!

ahem..yeah.


 

randay

Lifer
May 30, 2006
11,018
216
106
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: felony27
hmmm heres an idea lets close this thread and let mythbusters solve...what an idea.

Can't happen. They don't have this imaginary treadmill that breaks the laws of physics.

In any real world scenario it's obvious the plane can take off. I don't think anybody really believe this is not the case.

The question does not specifically state anything that requires a treadmill that breaks the laws of physics.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Originally posted by: Tommouse
I haven't read the whole thread, so forgive me, but its a bit big now and I have things to do :p

My understanding is that the treadmill matches the speed of the thrust of the plane, resulting in it being stationary, relative to the floor(not treadmill) or air. This would mean it's airspeed is 0, and with no airspeed there is no lift and no flight. For example think about a plane that is stationary and with a huge fan in front of it. It would eventually take off as there is enough airspeed but no actual speed, it all comes down to airspeed.

It can't match the thrust of the plane. The engines are rigidly attached to the body of the plane and act directly on it. All the treadmill can do is pull on the wheels, which will simply rotate in place and cause little additional drag on the plane beyond the rolling friction of the landing gear that it was designed to compensate for. The treadmill is unable to act directly on the plane in any way.
 

LukeMan

Platinum Member
Jun 7, 2005
2,380
0
0
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting for/against you. It doesn't matter what your wheels are doing, it only matters what your engines are doing. On take off the wheels/treadmill will be rolling/traveling @ an infinite Hz/velocity.
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Originally posted by: LukeMan
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting against you, which is easily overcome.

Even with zero friction between the wheel and axle the treadmill will still act on the plane.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: LukeMan
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting against you, which is easily overcome.

Even with zero friction between the wheel and axle the treadmill will still act on the plane.

yeap. but not enough to overcome the thrust of the engines. you need something to effect the body of the plane not the wheels.

such as tiedowns, a building etc. putting more drag on the wheels is not going to do it.
 

randay

Lifer
May 30, 2006
11,018
216
106
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: LukeMan
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting against you, which is easily overcome.

Even with zero friction between the wheel and axle the treadmill will still act on the plane.

yeap. but not enough to overcome the thrust of the engines. you need something to effect the body of the plane not the wheels.

such as tiedowns, a building etc. putting more drag on the wheels is not going to do it.

actually with 0 friction the treadmill cant even turn the wheels.
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: LukeMan
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting against you, which is easily overcome.

Even with zero friction between the wheel and axle the treadmill will still act on the plane.

yeap. but not enough to overcome the thrust of the engines. you need something to effect the body of the plane not the wheels.

such as tiedowns, a building etc. putting more drag on the wheels is not going to do it.

The wheels are attached to the body of the plane. If they where not attached they would not rotate. So if the plane acts on the wheels the wheels must therefor act on the plane. It is called newtons third law of motion.
 

LukeMan

Platinum Member
Jun 7, 2005
2,380
0
0
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: LukeMan
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting against you, which is easily overcome.

Even with zero friction between the wheel and axle the treadmill will still act on the plane.

how would the treadmill have any affect on the plane if the frictionless wheels/axles have no affect on the plane? You understand what grease and lube are used for right? -to decrease the amount of friction on the axle. With 0 Friction there is nothing pulling the plane in the same direction as the treadmill. Air would hold the plane in place, since it's the only force present.
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Originally posted by: randay
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: LukeMan
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting against you, which is easily overcome.

Even with zero friction between the wheel and axle the treadmill will still act on the plane.

yeap. but not enough to overcome the thrust of the engines. you need something to effect the body of the plane not the wheels.

such as tiedowns, a building etc. putting more drag on the wheels is not going to do it.

actually with 0 friction the treadmill cant even turn the wheels.

We are talking about the friction in the wheels being zero not the friction between treadmill and wheel but I'm sure you already knew that and are just trolling.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: LukeMan
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting against you, which is easily overcome.

Even with zero friction between the wheel and axle the treadmill will still act on the plane.

yeap. but not enough to overcome the thrust of the engines. you need something to effect the body of the plane not the wheels.

such as tiedowns, a building etc. putting more drag on the wheels is not going to do it.

The wheels are attached to the body of the plane. If they where not attached they would not rotate. So if the plane acts on the wheels the wheels must therefor act on the plane. It is called newtons third law of motion.

Jesus you have just enough knowledge to be stupid.

 

LukeMan

Platinum Member
Jun 7, 2005
2,380
0
0
Originally posted by: randay
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: LukeMan
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting against you, which is easily overcome.

Even with zero friction between the wheel and axle the treadmill will still act on the plane.

yeap. but not enough to overcome the thrust of the engines. you need something to effect the body of the plane not the wheels.

such as tiedowns, a building etc. putting more drag on the wheels is not going to do it.

actually with 0 friction the treadmill cant even turn the wheels.

Traction is still there, even though it's a form of friction.
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Originally posted by: LukeMan
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: LukeMan
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting against you, which is easily overcome.

Even with zero friction between the wheel and axle the treadmill will still act on the plane.

how would the treadmill have any affect on the plane if the frictionless wheels/axles have no affect on the plane? You understand what grease and lube are used for right? -to decrease the amount of friction on the axle. With 0 Friction there is nothing pulling the plane in the same direction as the treadmill. Air would hold the plane in place, since it's the only force present.

To rotate a wheel one must apply energy. This energy does not come from friction but from torque.
 

randay

Lifer
May 30, 2006
11,018
216
106
Originally posted by: LukeMan
Originally posted by: randay
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: LukeMan
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting against you, which is easily overcome.

Even with zero friction between the wheel and axle the treadmill will still act on the plane.

yeap. but not enough to overcome the thrust of the engines. you need something to effect the body of the plane not the wheels.

such as tiedowns, a building etc. putting more drag on the wheels is not going to do it.

actually with 0 friction the treadmill cant even turn the wheels.

Traction is still there, even though it's a form of friction.

It might still be there, but it is 0. We can't ignore friction when and where we please? can we?
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: LukeMan
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting against you, which is easily overcome.

Even with zero friction between the wheel and axle the treadmill will still act on the plane.

yeap. but not enough to overcome the thrust of the engines. you need something to effect the body of the plane not the wheels.

such as tiedowns, a building etc. putting more drag on the wheels is not going to do it.

The wheels are attached to the body of the plane. If they where not attached they would not rotate. So if the plane acts on the wheels the wheels must therefor act on the plane. It is called newtons third law of motion.

Jesus you have just enough knowledge to be stupid.

Nice personal attack it is a shame you lack the knowledge to judge stupidity.
Explain how the plane can make the wheel rotate with out decreasing its own speed.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: sao123
Originally posted by: ElFenix
the whole thing depends on how much force the treadmill can put through the wheels.
if you've got 10,000 lbs of thrust from the turbines, you're going to need 10,000 pounds of force coming through the wheels to keep the plane from moving.


free spinning wheels will allow on a transfer of force up to a maximum of the friction generated between the wheels, the lubricant, and the center axle. Which in this case is not significant.

which is why this whole problem is stupid. for the plane to take off, the wheels are going to be spinning much faster than the conveyor belt. but the question has assumed that the wheels and conveyor belt are spinning at exactly the same rate. no normal wheel will do that. the only way it'd happen is if there is lots of friction in the wheel. so the problem has already assumed that the necessary friction is there. so the plane won't take off, but only because the problem is stupid and has nothing to do with reality.

The wheel doesn't need friction.

If the wheel was on the treadmill with out the plane it would not spin. Nothing is connected to the axle so not torque is applied.

The wheels on the plane spin so a force must be applied to the torque must be applied to the wheels otherwise they would not spin. Friction itself can not make the wheels spin. The kinetic energy of the spinning wheel increased the kinetic energy of the plane must decrease.


Have you ever pushed a car with the engine off or dead? The wheels rotate even though there is no power applied to the wheels right? The wheels rotate because the rolling friction of the bearings is less than the sliding friction of the rubber and asphalt... the wheel has no choice but to rotate.

Take a heavy box of books placed on thick carpet, and another equally heavy box on top of the first box. Push the top box only. Because the friction between the bottom box and the carpet is greater than the friction between the two boxes, the boxes will slide against each other before they both move together. This is exactly the same transfer of motion that rotates the wheels in your car when you push on the car body in neutral, and is the reason the wheels rotate on a plane when the engines push against the body of the plane. There is no power applied to the wheels. Friction is the only force causing the wheels to rotate.

Are we clear on that part at least?

Which part of a wheel with no axle on a treadmill don't you understand. For reference that is not that same as a car.

I didn't posted it because this whole thread has assumed it but we are talking about the case with infinite static friction so the wheel can not slide.

We are talking about a plane on a treadmill. A wheel simply sitting on a treadmill will sit stationary with the treadmill, yes. You understand that at least. Now attempt to expand your understanding if you are willing.

On a plane however, you have axles suspended on bearings that connect the wheel to the plane.

In order to get torque, a rotational force, from a linear force, that linear force must be directed at some point other than the rotational axis.

In the plane you have two forces on the wheel.

The first force is the force of the engine pushing the axle forward, edge on, though the bearings like this: (axle) <---- force of engines on plane. This force pushes the axle assembly forward without causing torque because it is directed directly into the center of rotation of the wheel. If there were no other forces involved, or if the plane was sitting on a frictionless surface, the wheels would stay still and be carried by the axle and the plane, and there would only be linear movement. The wheels would not spin.

But we have another force, static friction on the bottom of the wheel. As the plane pushes the wheel horizontally through its axis of rotation, the wheel, in contact with some surface on only one side, experiences friction in the opposite direction that the plane is trying to push it. This is on the outside edge of the tire, and this friction force is not directed towards the axis of rotation but is tangent to the perimeter of the tire. Thus a net torque results causing the wheel to rotate, even though there is no power directly applied to the axle.

Don't bother coming back to this thread until you understand the physics behind a simple wheel first.
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: LukeMan
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting against you, which is easily overcome.

Even with zero friction between the wheel and axle the treadmill will still act on the plane.

yeap. but not enough to overcome the thrust of the engines. you need something to effect the body of the plane not the wheels.

such as tiedowns, a building etc. putting more drag on the wheels is not going to do it.

The wheels are attached to the body of the plane. If they where not attached they would not rotate. So if the plane acts on the wheels the wheels must therefor act on the plane. It is called newtons third law of motion.

Jesus you have just enough knowledge to be stupid.

Nice personal attack it is a shame you lack the knowledge to judge stupidity.
Explain how the plane can make the wheel rotate with out decreasing its own speed.

Those big things under the wing? They're called "engines."

- M4H
 

LukeMan

Platinum Member
Jun 7, 2005
2,380
0
0
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: LukeMan
aren't we suppose to neglect friction? If there is 0 Friction, then it doesn't matter what speed the treadmill is moving. Hell, with 0 Friction you could turn the plane engines off and set the treadmill to 100mph and the plane would move as fast as the treadmill. You need Friction for the wheels to have any affect on the plane. With 0 Friction, the Air is the only Force acting against you, which is easily overcome.

Even with zero friction between the wheel and axle the treadmill will still act on the plane.

yeap. but not enough to overcome the thrust of the engines. you need something to effect the body of the plane not the wheels.

such as tiedowns, a building etc. putting more drag on the wheels is not going to do it.

The wheels are attached to the body of the plane. If they where not attached they would not rotate. So if the plane acts on the wheels the wheels must therefor act on the plane. It is called newtons third law of motion.

The plane is not acting on the wheels, the treadmill is acting upon the wheels since the treadmill has traction, and there is 0 Friction between the plane and the wheels. Therefore the wheels are of no consequence to the plane.
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: sao123
Originally posted by: ElFenix
the whole thing depends on how much force the treadmill can put through the wheels.
if you've got 10,000 lbs of thrust from the turbines, you're going to need 10,000 pounds of force coming through the wheels to keep the plane from moving.


free spinning wheels will allow on a transfer of force up to a maximum of the friction generated between the wheels, the lubricant, and the center axle. Which in this case is not significant.

which is why this whole problem is stupid. for the plane to take off, the wheels are going to be spinning much faster than the conveyor belt. but the question has assumed that the wheels and conveyor belt are spinning at exactly the same rate. no normal wheel will do that. the only way it'd happen is if there is lots of friction in the wheel. so the problem has already assumed that the necessary friction is there. so the plane won't take off, but only because the problem is stupid and has nothing to do with reality.

The wheel doesn't need friction.

If the wheel was on the treadmill with out the plane it would not spin. Nothing is connected to the axle so not torque is applied.

The wheels on the plane spin so a force must be applied to the torque must be applied to the wheels otherwise they would not spin. Friction itself can not make the wheels spin. The kinetic energy of the spinning wheel increased the kinetic energy of the plane must decrease.


Have you ever pushed a car with the engine off or dead? The wheels rotate even though there is no power applied to the wheels right? The wheels rotate because the rolling friction of the bearings is less than the sliding friction of the rubber and asphalt... the wheel has no choice but to rotate.

Take a heavy box of books placed on thick carpet, and another equally heavy box on top of the first box. Push the top box only. Because the friction between the bottom box and the carpet is greater than the friction between the two boxes, the boxes will slide against each other before they both move together. This is exactly the same transfer of motion that rotates the wheels in your car when you push on the car body in neutral, and is the reason the wheels rotate on a plane when the engines push against the body of the plane. There is no power applied to the wheels. Friction is the only force causing the wheels to rotate.

Are we clear on that part at least?

Which part of a wheel with no axle on a treadmill don't you understand. For reference that is not that same as a car.

I didn't posted it because this whole thread has assumed it but we are talking about the case with infinite static friction so the wheel can not slide.

We are talking about a plane on a treadmill. A wheel simply sitting on a treadmill will sit stationary with the treadmill, yes. You understand that at least. Now attempt to expand your understanding if you are willing.

On a plane however, you have axles suspended on bearings that connect the wheel to the plane.

In order to get torque, a rotational force, from a linear force, that linear force must be directed at some point other than the rotational axis.

In the plane you have two forces on the wheel.

The first force is the force of the engine pushing the axle forward, edge on, though the bearings like this: (axle) <---- force of engines on plane. This force pushes the axle assembly forward without causing torque because it is directed directly into the center of rotation of the wheel. If there were no other forces involved, or if the plane was sitting on a frictionless surface, the wheels would stay still and be carried by the axle and the plane, and there would only be linear movement. The wheels would not spin.

But we have another force, static friction on the bottom of the wheel. As the plane pushes the wheel horizontally through its axis of rotation, the wheel, in contact with some surface on only one side, experiences friction in the opposite direction that the plane is trying to push it. This is on the outside edge of the tire, and this friction force is not directed towards the axis of rotation but is tangent to the perimeter of the tire. Thus a net torque results causing the wheel to rotate, even though there is no power directly applied to the axle.

Don't bother coming back to this thread until you understand the physics behind a simple wheel first.

clap, clap, clap.

Now do all that in reverse and you can see the treadmill acts on the plane.