Plus I pin all my apps to the taskbar which is what Windows is designed for.
That only makes sense for frequently used programs. It's a waste of space for anything that's not pretty much running all the time or used at least once a day.
The Start Menu provides quick access to less frequently, but still regularly used programs and files. The start screen does replicate that functionality pretty decently for programs, but not for files. As a work around, I have a folder with shortcuts to frequently used files, and I've pinned THAT where my start menu would be. Not sure how having a start menu icon that actually just launches the start screen will change that though.
Oh, and I don't like that the little area on the right of the screen that minimizes all programs is no longer visibly clickable. Obviously it clearly highlighting as a button makes sense, and in 8 there's no indication that it is, nor that the right is a launcher for the start screen.
I don't see how anyone can argue that that's "progress".
Not to bash 8 though, mostly I like it just fine, and mostly it works just like 7, and I continue to prefer Windows to any other OS.
that is a pure example of wasted space! I mean you have VLC on the taskbar? seriously? why would anyone need that? usually your video player has the association to open all video files so if you double click on a video file it will open with VLC! see the point? you are just pinning programs like that randomly to have a colorful useless taskbar! and what happens when you open so many programs? you will have no more taskbar space that it will look all crumped and probably will show you a DOWN ARROW to access more
Yeah, IMO it's not appropriate to just pin anything down there. Ditto for OS X's dock.
pinned items take up a big chunk of the taskbar and look much the same as open program... making one unnecessarily focus to determine if it is an open and running program or just a hotlink to a closed program.
In OS X that's true. It's become virtually impossible to tell if a program is running without studying it.
In Windows though I think it's much more obvious which programs are running. There's also, thankfully, an easy work around to make it MUCH easier to tell-just set the taskbar buttons setting to never combine. They're just icons when they're not running, but appear like in Vista and earlier when they are , making them easier to click, and making it super easy to tell what's running and what's not. FAR superior to OS X's "hmm, is there...kind of a tiny dot on that? Or maybe it's glare? Hmm, I'm not sure" ridiculous method lol
the quick launch bar (which does exist in windows 7) is far superior in my opinion... I locate the 20 most used programs there... taking up a minimum of screen real estate.
It was a little learning curve for me, but I do prefer the Windows 7/8 method. It's basically just combining the quick launch and task bars together. Instead of super tiny icons that never go away, you have larger versions, also on the taskbar, that then blow up full size when you launch a program.
for programs that I want easy access to but which I use less frequently... notepad, calculator, excel, games, etc... then they are located out of sight on the 1st level of the start menu.
Yep, I do the same thing, start menu in 7 and earlier for less frequently used, start screen in 8 (plus my files folder trick since you inexplicably can't pin files to the start screen).
the abortion of the start screen on a desktop or laptop situation should never be forced on anyone... and the deletion of the start menu and quick launch features in order to push use of a shitty start screen interface is yet another idea that was stillborn before it was ever conceived...
I think to be fair Microsoft had a hard task at trying to combine interfaces to handle both touch/ultra mobile form factors and notebooks and desktops. I'm not sure there's any perfect way to do it, and the result is a bit weirdly disjointed, but no one else has even attempted it, and I like that they HAVE attempted it (it's what I wanted from the iPad 1, instead of just giving us a giant iPod).
On notebooks/desktops the start screen functions as a semi-decent start menu, and the metro stuff is even occasionally useful. Of course the whole locking metro stuff to the windows store and locking the windows store to metro is arguably quite lame, but...