well after some more testing and changing the BIOS from the moded TCCD version of the 1B BIOS to the official 1B BIOS, and running a divider of 166, i was able to get the chip stable at 2.7Ghz, at 1.52 volts, this i had stable for 8 hours, the problem is i just havent had the time recently to run a full 12 hours on small FFT's and 12 hours on large FFT's which is what i personally consider fully prime stable, along with quite a few passes ~25 ish of memtest with no errors, and a couple of tests with S&M.
I did notice that with the case panels back on and the case back in the desk, and with the CPU running at 2.7Ghz i was getting a max load temp of 56c and case temp of 28c.
I think the CPU required more voltage for the memory controllers to be able to hold tight timings and high speeds for the RAM, so using the 166 divider i am looking at 245Mhz for the memory clock which I am using now, this is ideal as i will be looking to get the new OCZ 2x1GB 4000EB, which should be able to hold timings of 2.5-3-2-x whilst running at ~245Mhz, and i might see if i can push for 2.75Ghz who knows .. all i can say is this chip rocks .. and dont forget i came from 1.8GHz ..

Question to the people with the X2's, what is the reason why you dont use high voltage as on the single cores? Is it because of high temperature, high current draw, or has it
been documented that voltage excessive of 1.5v can have detrimental effects on the CPU?s life expectancy.
I think it is mainly the temps as I have realised a massive difference between the dual core and the single core I previously had, obviously due to the extra core.
Like people have said on XS though the x9 multi can be a killer , but lucky my board was able to support high HTT .. good old MSI and their K8N Neo 2 platty.
EDIT: Shortly i will add some benchmark pics in for everything i can think of, just so people can have an idea of what this is capable of
