• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

My problem with Shakespeare

qIat

Senior member
Now, I'm a literary hobbyist, and I have the utmost respect for his linguistic abilities, but I have a problem with his texts: In so many of them, the catalyst for the drama is some silly, stupid mistake. Granted, that is not the focus nor the gist of his plays, and is in fact a mechanism he often uses, but it rubs me the wrong way, and it's a small peeve in otherwise impressive works.
 
Originally posted by: qIat
Now, I'm a literary hobbyist, and I have the utmost respect for his linguistic abilities, but I have a problem with his texts: In so many of them, the catalyst for the drama is some silly, stupid mistake. Granted, that is not the focus nor the gist of his plays, and is in fact a mechanism he often uses, but it rubs me the wrong way, and it's a small peeve in otherwise impressive works.

I find them rather parallel with everyday life on some levels.
 
Originally posted by: qIat
Now, I'm a literary hobbyist, and I have the utmost respect for his linguistic abilities, but I have a problem with his texts: In so many of them, the catalyst for the drama is some silly, stupid mistake. Granted, that is not the focus nor the gist of his plays, and is in fact a mechanism he often uses, but it rubs me the wrong way, and it's a small peeve in otherwise impressive works.

It's irrelevant.

I'm guessing you're looking for something to dislike, if you know what I mean.

Sure there are mistakes and inadequacies in Shakespeare, that makes them palatable and more impressive in a way, I think.
 
Back
Top