My PC Is now fully underwater

FiLeZz

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2000
4,778
47
91
Went water cooling about 16 years ago. I came back to it about 1 year ago.

I just put my GPU's underwater 3 7970's to feed my 3x30" dell monitors.. This crap cost more then it should. I have well over 1k in water parts alone.

More pics to come once I get my mess cleaned up from the GPU block install.

IMG_1143.JPG



IMG_1144.JPG
 
Last edited:

FiLeZz

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2000
4,778
47
91
y is this in ot

Would you rather I say I pissed my pants and eat ants, then can it go in off topic..
Off topic is off topic, should I change my subject to OMFG this is an OT thread with water.

Or better yet I will draw a picture for you underwater of my PC.
 

Kyle

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 1999
4,145
11
91
Would you rather I say I pissed my pants and eat ants, then can it go in off topic..
Off topic is off topic, should I change my subject to OMFG this is an OT thread with water.

Or better yet I will draw a picture for you underwater of my PC.

OR..or...you could post it in one of the many hardware/CPU/overclocking forums in this very forum....
 

phucheneh

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2012
7,306
5
0
Water cooling is dumb. You're transferring heat through insulated tubing to a small radiator...that you're then air cooling.

It's especially silly when you consider than most GPU/CPU setups share a loop with parts that have vastly different thermal limits.

I would not shit on your setup in the overclocking forum. But this is OT. So here, have some of my poo.
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
Water cooling is dumb. You're transferring heat through insulated tubing to a small radiator...that you're then air cooling.

It's especially silly when you consider than most GPU/CPU setups share a loop with parts that have vastly different thermal limits.

I would not shit on your setup in the overclocking forum. But this is OT. So here, have some of my poo.

Came to say this. You've got pretty-much the same radiating surface area and CFM as you would without water cooling. The fans are closer to the outside of the case and the sound is louder. Lose.

Water cooling only makes sense if you have some MONSTER external radiator and you can use less active cooling.
 

masteryoda34

Golden Member
Dec 17, 2007
1,399
3
81
Water cooling is dumb. You're transferring heat through insulated tubing to a small radiator...that you're then air cooling.

It's especially silly when you consider than most GPU/CPU setups share a loop with parts that have vastly different thermal limits.

I would not shit on your setup in the overclocking forum. But this is OT. So here, have some of my poo.

Why don't you try running your car without coolant or a radiator?

Oh yeah, there is that whole surface area thing...
 

phucheneh

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2012
7,306
5
0
Why don't you try running your car without coolant or a radiator?

Oh yeah, there is that whole surface area thing...

404 analogy not found.

You need to learn how water cooling in a car works. Combustion chamber temps are a lot hotter than a CPU core, and you've got coolant both flowing through the cylinder head and surrounding the cylinders themselves, constantly circulating coolant to remove heat from large chunks of iron and aluminum and transfer them to a relatively massive radiator with lots of airflow.

...as opposed to taking a flat plate pressed against the surface of a CPU (same as would be used in air cooling) and throwing some coolant against it, and expecting that to net you massive gains.

It's like trying to take an aircooled VW and add on water cooling after-the-fact, in the least effective way possible.
 

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
857
126
Why don't you try running your car without coolant or a radiator?

Oh yeah, there is that whole surface area thing...

Unlike watercooling versus a tower cooler, the radiator has a lot more surface area and CFM through it than the engine block. Also, the engine works better when warm and the radiator is mostly to keep it from getting too warm by controlling flow and the fan. A CPU can't typically get too cool and doesn't need to be managed like that.
 
Last edited:

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,616
13,817
126
www.anyf.ca
That's not submerged in water. *throws PC in bath tub* THAT is submerged in water. :p

Seriously though, if you were to use 100% distilled water it could probably work. At least till minerals start to show up in the water from general breakdown of components.
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
11
81
That's not submerged in water. *throws PC in bath tub* THAT is submerged in water. :p

Seriously though, if you were to use 100% distilled water it could probably work. At least till minerals start to show up in the water from general breakdown of components.
Put the PC in a recirculating bath in a loop with a continuous deionizer (or a mixed resin bed)
 

BlitzPuppet

Platinum Member
Feb 4, 2012
2,460
7
81
I used to do the whole WC thing, but the draining/bleeding was too much of a PITA when you had to switch out/install/upgrade your PC.

More power to ya though!
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,647
6,528
126
what is the point of spending $1k in water cooling? what benefits does this give you over using the normal cooling fans? is it just the sound?
 

Saint Nick

Lifer
Jan 21, 2005
17,722
6
81
Unlike watercooling versus a tower cooler, the radiator has a lot more surface area and CFM through it than the engine block. Also, the engine works better when warm and the radiator is mostly to keep it from getting too warm by controlling flow and the fan. A CPU can't typically get too cool and doesn't need to be managed like that.
Are you an Ichi pretty much the Fraiser and Niles of AnandTech? So who's who?
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
One day, you'll discover girls, and your whole outlook on life will change...
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,904
34,023
136
One day, you'll discover girls, and your whole outlook on life will change...
It's just different. For one thing they cost more and for another they get really pissed if you try to water cool them.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
It's just different. For one thing they cost more and for another they get really pissed if you try to water cool them.

On the other hand, you can do things with them that would get you electrocuted if you tried it with a PC.